1 Eugene Bardach, The Implementation Game (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1977).
2.
and Herbert Simon, Administrative Behavior (New York: The Free Press, 1947).
3.
Ronald Randall
, "Presidential Power Versus Bureaucratic Intransigence: The Influence of the Nixon Administration on Welfare Policy,"American Political Science Review73 (September 1979): 795-810.
4.
Lawrence C. Dodd
and Richard L. Schott, Congress and the Administrative State (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1979).
5.
5 Kenneth R. Mladenka, "The Urban Bureaucracy and the Chicago Political Machine: Who Gets What and the Limits to Political Control,"American Political Science Review74 (December 1980): 991-998.
6.
6 Glenn Abney and Thomas P. Lauth, "A Comparative Analysis of Distributional and Enforcement Decisions in Cities,"Journal of Politics, 44 (February 1982): 193-200.
7.
7 Douglas Arnold, Congress and the Bureaucracy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979).
8.
8 For example, see Daniel J. Elazar, American Federalism: A View From the States (New York: Thomas Crowell, 1972).
9.
9 Joseph A. Schlesinger, "The Politics of the Executive" in Herbert Jacob and Kenneth N. Vines, Politics in the American States (Boston: Little Brown and Co., 1971), pp. 210-237.
10.
10 For confirmation of this view, see George E. Hale and Marian Lief Palley, "Federal Grants to the States,"Administration and Society11 (May 1979): 3-26.
11.
11 This interaction with supporters rather than opponents is quite similar to the reported behavior of lobbyists. See Harmon Zeigler and Michael Baer, Lobbying: Interaction and Influence in American State Legislatures (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1969), pp. 128-133.
