and J. B. McKinney and L. C. Howard'sPublic Administration: Balancing Power and Accountability (Oak Park, Ill.: Moore Publishing, 1979).
2.
2 In order to determine the total number of New York agencies, the New York State Directory was consulted. The Directory, arranged by organizational members as well as by structural units, helped determine agencies which, by definition, are assumed to be information-intensive. A second, more detailed scan of internal organizational structure determined those units which are information-intensive yet lack visibility. The following agencies were selected for analysis: Department of Agriculture and Markets Atmospheric Sciences Research Center Division of the Budget Department of Commerce Office of Drug Abuse Services New York State Energy Office New York State Energy Research and Development Administration Department of Environmental Conservation Department of Health Higher Education Services Corporation Department of Mental Hygiene Department of Motor Vehicles Department of Public Service Research Foundation of the State University of New York Legislative Commission on Science and Technology New York State Science and Technology Foundation Department of Social Services Division of State Police Department of Transportation
3.
3 The selection of individuals for the survey population was accomplished by using three procedures. First, key administrators located in the various organizations were asked to provide a comprehensive listing of people within their organizations who could be regarded as "professional" (defined as one who engages in a non-routine, non-processing activity or series of activities which are often directed toward problem-solving). Second, these administrators were asked to provide names of individuals outside the formal organizational-unit structure with whom they frequently interacted, both formally and informally. Third, the researcher consulted available organizational directories which included specific titles and names.
4.
4 The statistical measure, Kendall's tau, is suitable for the analysis of primary ordinal level data used in this study. Rather than choose an alternative measure, such as Spearman's rho, Somer's d, Goodman and Kruskal's gamma, the assumption was made—based on the sample size—that the data may contain a large number of tied ranks. Use of Kendall's tau is, therefore, appropriate under these circumstances.
5.
5Source: Office of Intergovernmental Personnel Programs, Projects for Improved State and Local Management (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1980).
6.
Aldrich, H. E.Organizations and Environment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
7.
Alexander, E. R."Goal Setting and Growth in an Uncertain World: A Case Study of a Local Community Organization."Public Administration Review36 (1976): 182-191.
8.
Allen, T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the Research and Development Organization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1977.
9.
Bozeman, B.
and E. Slusher. "Scarcity and Environmental Stress in Public Organizations."Administration and Society11 (1979): 335-355.
10.
Herzberg, F.Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland: World Publishing Co., 1966.
11.
Katz, D.
and R. L. Kahn. The Social Psychology of Organizations, 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978.
12.
Keller, R. T.
and W. E. Holland. "Boundary-Spanning Roles in a Research and Development Organization: An Empirical Investigation."Academy of Management Journal (1975): 388-393.
13.
Kraemer, K. L.
and J. L. King. Computers and Local Government, Vol. 1. New York: Praeger, 1977.
14.
Kramer, F. A.Contemporary Approach to Public Budgeting. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop, 1979.
15.
Lawler, E. E.
and J. G. Rhode. Information and Control in Organizations. Pacific Palisades, Calif.: Goodyear, 1976.
16.
Lee, R. D. Jr.Public Personnel Systems. Baltimore, Md.: University Park Press, 1979.
17.
Leifer, R.
and E. McDonough. "Technology, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Structure and Structure and Boundary Spanning Behavior."Administrative Science Quarterly22 (1977): 235-247.
18.
Liefer, R.
and E. McDonough. "Technology, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Structure and Effectiveness."Academy of Management Proceedings (1979): 195-199.
19.
Levine, C. H."Organizational Decline and Cutback Management."Public Administration Review (1978): 316-325.
20.
Likert, R.The Human Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
21.
McGowan, R. P.
and S. Loveless. "Strategies for Information Management: The Administrator's Perspective."Public Administration Review41 (May/June 1981): 331-339.
22.
Merton, R. K.Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press, 1957.
23.
Morrisey, G. L.Management by Objectives and Results in the Public Sector. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1976.
24.
Perry, J. L.
and J. N. Danziger. "The Adoptability of Innovations: An' Empirical Assessment of Computer Applications in Local Governments,"Administration and Society11 (1980): 461-492.
25.
Perry, J. L.
and K. L. Kraemer. "Innovation Attributes, Policy Interventions, and the Diffusion of Computer Applications Among Local Governments,"Policy Sciences9 (1978): 179-205.
26.
Pfeffer, J.
and G. Salancik. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row, 1978.
27.
Radford, K. J.Information Systems for Strategic Decisions. Reston, Va.: Reston Publishing, 1978.
28.
Radford, K. J.Information Systems in Management. Reston, Va.: Reston Publishing, 1973.
29.
Sanders, D. H.Computers and Management in a Changing Society. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.
30.
Strassman, P. A."The Office of the Future: Information Management for the New Age."Technology Review (1980): 54-65.
31.
Taylor, R. L.
and J. M. Utterback. "A Longitudinal Study of Communication in Research: Technical and Managerial Influences."IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. EM-22 (1975): 80-87.
32.
Walton, E. J."The Comparison of Measures of Organization Structure."Academy of Management Review6 (1981): 155-160.
33.
Whetten, D. A."Sources, Responses, and Effects of Organizational Decline." In The Organizational LifeCycle, J.R. Kimberlyet al., eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980, pp. 342-374.
34.
White, M. J.
, R. Clayton, R. Myrtle, G. Siegel, and A. Rose. Managing Public Systems: Analytic Techniques for Public Administration. North Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury, 1980.
35.
Wildavsky, A.Politics and the Budgetary Process. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1974.