Despite the increasing research attention devoted to transformational leadership in public administration, there is still concern over whether it is appropriate and effective in the public context. To answer the important question of whether and when transformational leadership is effective, this study meta-analytically reviewed transformational leadership research based on 70 primary studies that include 151 independent effect sizes from 718,601 participants. It was found that transformational leadership was significantly related to outcomes at both individual (motivations, attitudes, and behaviors) and organizational (performance and innovation) levels, and positively related to transactional leadership and leader-member exchange. Moderation analyses revealed that national cultural values and public/semipublic affiliation of the studied samples, as well as measurement scales of transformational leadership explained some of the transformational leadership-outcome relationship variations. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AndersenJ. A. (2010). Public versus private managers: How public and private managers differ in leadership behavior. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02117.x
2.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/258189
3.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M.JungD. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789
4.
BackhausL.VogelR. (2022). Leadership in the public sector: A meta-analysis of styles, outcomes, contexts, and methods. Public Administration Review, 82(6), 986–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13516
5.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
6.
BaoY.GeL. (2019). Linking transformational leadership and value congruence among Chinese police force: The mediating role of goal clarity and the moderating role of public service motivation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12389
7.
BaoY.YangC. (2024). Help or harm? Understanding the nuanced influence mechanisms between paradoxical leadership behaviors and work–family conflicts in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2341854
8.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance: Beyond expectations. Free Press.
9.
BassB. M. (1997). Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries. American Psychologist, 52(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130
10.
BassB. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410
11.
BassB. M.RiggioR. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
BelléN. (2014). Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut033
13.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. J. Wiley.
14.
BlomR.KruyenP. M.Van der HeijdenB. I. J. M.Van ThielS. (2020). One HRM fits all? A meta-analysis of the effects of HRM practices in the public, semipublic, and private sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x18773492
15.
BonoJ. E.JudgeT. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.901
16.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12
17.
BorensteinM.HigginsJ. (2013). Meta-analysis and subgroups. Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0377-7
18.
BorstR. T.KruyenP. M.LakoC. J.de VriesM. S. (2020). The attitudinal, behavioral, and performance outcomes of work engagement: A comparative meta-analysis across the public, semipublic, and private sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 613–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x19840399
19.
BroL. L.JensenU. T. (2020). Does transformational leadership stimulate user orientation? Evidence from a field experiment. Public Administration, 98(1), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12612
20.
BundgaardL.JacobsenC. B.JensenU. T. (2021). Leadership in the public sector: Concepts, context and outlooks. In SteijnB.KniesE. (Eds.), Research handbook on HRM in the public sector (pp. 29–42). Edwards Elgar Publishing Limited.
21.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership (Vol. 24). Harper and Row.
22.
ChristieA.BarlingJ.TurnerN. (2011). Pseudo-transformational leadership: Model specification and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(12), 2943–2984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00858.x
23.
CredeM.JongJ.HarmsP. (2019). The generalizability of transformational leadership across cultures: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(3), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0506
24.
CrosbyB. C.BrysonJ. M. (2018). Why leadership of public leadership research matters: And what to do about it. Public Management Review, 20(9), 1265–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1348731
25.
DeinertA.HomanA. C.BoerD.VoelpelS. C.GutermannD. (2015). Transformational leadership sub-dimensions and their link to leaders’ personality and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1095–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.001
26.
De VriesH.BekkersV.TummersL. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
27.
DumdumU. R.LoweK. B.AvolioB. J. (2013). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. In B. J. Avolio & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead(Vol. 5, pp. 39–70). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120130000005008
28.
DuvalS. (2005). The trim and fill method. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.),Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments(pp. 127–144). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch8
FieldA. P.GillettR. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X502733
31.
FrankenE.PlimmerG.MalinenS. (2020). Paradoxical leadership in public sector organisations: Its role in fostering employee resilience. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12396
32.
GatenbyM.ReesC.TrussC.AlfesK.SoaneE. (2015). Managing change, or changing managers? The role of middle managers in UK public service reform. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1124–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.895028
33.
GeorgeB.PandeyS. K.SteijnB.DecramerA.AudenaertM. (2021). Red tape, organizational performance, and employee outcomes: Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and research agenda. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13327
34.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (2014). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Elsevier Science.
35.
HochJ. E.BommerW. H.DulebohnJ. H.WuD. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461
36.
HofstedeG. H. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage Publications.
37.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J.FavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuaptaV. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. Sage.
38.
HouseR. J.WrightN. S.AdityaR. N. (1997). Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory.
39.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
40.
JacobsenC. B.AndersenL. B.BøllingtoftA.EriksenT. L. M. (2022). Can leadership training improve organizational effectiveness? Evidence from a randomized field experiment on transformational and transactional leadership. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13356
41.
JensenU. T. (2018). Does perceived societal impact moderate the effect of transformational leadership on value congruence? Evidence from a field experiment. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12852
42.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.BroL. L.BøllingtoftA.EriksenT. L. M.HoltenA.-L.JacobsenC. B.LadenburgJ.NielsenP. A.SalomonsenH. H.Westergård-NielsenN.WürtzA. (2019a). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration & Society, 51(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716667157
43.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.JacobsenC. B. (2019b). Only when we agree! How value congruence moderates the impact of goal-oriented leadership on public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13008
44.
JensenU. T.BroL. L. (2018). How transformational leadership supports intrinsic motivation and public service motivation: The mediating role of basic need satisfaction. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017699470
45.
JensenU. T.MoynihanD. P.SalomonsenH. H. (2018). Communicating the vision: How face-to-face dialogue facilitates transformational leadership. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12922
46.
JiangK.LiuD.McKayP. F.LeeT. W.MitchellT. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028610
47.
JinS.SeoM.-G.ShapiroD. L. (2016). Do happy leaders lead better? Affective and attitudinal antecedents of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.002
48.
KirkmanB. L.ChenG.FarhJ.-L.ChenZ. X.LoweK. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744–764. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43669971
49.
KohD.LeeK.JoshiK. (2019). Transformational leadership and creativity: A meta-analytic review and identification of an integrated model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(6), 625–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2355
50.
LeithwoodK.SunJ. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership:A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x11436268
51.
LimJ. Y.MoonK.-K. (2021). Transformational leadership and employees’ helping behavior in public organizations: Does organizational structure matter?Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020977565
52.
LinS.-H.ScottB. A.MattaF. K. (2019). The dark side of transformational leader behaviors for leaders themselves: A conservation of resources perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1556–1582. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1255
53.
LoweK. B.KroeckK. G.SivasubramaniamN. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformation and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(96)90027-2
54.
LyonsS. T.DuxburyL. E.HigginsC. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00620.x
55.
NgT. W. H. (2017). Transformational leadership and performance outcomes: Analyses of multiple mediation pathways. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.008
56.
NguyenT. T.BermanE. M.PlimmerG.SamartiniA.SabharwalM.TaylorJ. (2022). Enriching transactional leadership with public values. Public Administration Review, 82(6), 1058–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13495
57.
NielsenP. A.BoyeS.HoltenA.-L.JacobsenC. B.AndersenL. B. (2019). Are transformational and transactional types of leadership compatible? A two-wave study of employee motivation. Public Administration, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12574
58.
OraziD. C.TurriniA.ValottiG. (2013). Public sector leadership: New perspectives for research and practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313489945
59.
OwensB. P.WallaceA. S.WaldmanD. A. (2015). Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: The counterbalancing effect of leader humility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038698
60.
PaarlbergL. E.LavignaB. (2010). Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02199.x
61.
PandeyS. K.DavisR. S.PandeyS.PengS. (2016). Transformational leadership and the use of normative public values: Can employees be inspired to serve larger public purposes?Public Administration, 94(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12214
62.
ParkH.HooblerJ. M.WuJ.LidenR. C.HuJ.WilsonM. S. (2019). Abusive supervision and employee deviance: A multifoci justice perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 158, 1113–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3749-2
63.
ParkS. M.RaineyH. G. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in US federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887954
64.
PengJ.LiM.WangZ.LinY. (2021). Transformational leadership and Employees’ reactions to organizational change: Evidence from a meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(3), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320920366
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.MoormanR. H.FetterR. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
RaineyH. G. (2003). Understanding and managing public organizations. Jossey-Bass.
69.
RaineyH. G.BozemanB. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the A Priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024276
70.
RingquistE. (2013). Meta-analysis for public management and policy. John Wiley & Sons.
71.
SchmidtF. L.OhI.-S. (2013). Methods for second order meta-analysis and illustrative applications. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.002
ShamirB.HouseR. J.ArthurM. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.577
74.
SimsionG. (2007). Data modeling theory and practice. Technics Publications.
75.
StazykE. C.DavisR. S. (2019). Transformational leaders: Bridging the gap between goal ambiguity and public value involvement. Public Management Review, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1588357
76.
SunR.HendersonA. C. (2017). Transformational leadership and organizational processes: Influencing public performance. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 554–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12654
77.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.
78.
van KnippenbergD.SitkinS. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.759433
van WartM. (2011). Dynamics of leadership in public service: Theory and practice. M.E. Sharpe.
81.
van WartM. (2012). Dynamics of leadership in public service: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). M. E. Sharpe.
82.
van WartM. (2013a). Administrative leadership theory: A reassessment after 10 years. Public Administration, 91(3), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12017
83.
van WartM. (2013b). Lessons from leadership theory and the contemporary challenges of leaders. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12069
84.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
85.
Vigoda-GadotE.BeeriI. (2012). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in public administration: The power of leadership and the cost of organizational politics. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 22(3), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur036
86.
VogelR.MasalD. (2015). Public leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1165–1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.895031
87.
VoronovM.SingerJ. A. (2002). The myth of individualism-collectivism: A critical review. Journal of Social Psychology, 142(4), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603912
88.
WangG.OhI.-S.CourtrightS.ColbertA. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36, 223–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111401017
89.
WattsL. L.SteeleL. M.Den HartogD. N. (2020). Uncertainty avoidance moderates the relationship between transformational leadership and innovation: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(1), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00242-8
90.
WrightB. E.MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02496.x
91.
WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2010). Transformational leadership in the public sector: Does structure matter?Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 20(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup003
92.
YuklG. A. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
93.
ZhangJ.LiH.YangK. (2022). A meta-analysis of the government performance—trust link: Taking cultural and methodological factors into account. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13439
94.
ZhangY.WaldmanD. A.HanY.-L.LiX.-B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0995
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
