Judicializing Public Interests: Administrative Performance Under the Shadow of Judicial Review

Abstract

Do active judicial reviews bring about better administrative performance? Most scholars argue that active judicial review creates animosity between the judiciary and administration, leading to bad administrative performance. Others advocate that the relationship is not so much hostile as it is constructive. However, the actual impact of and mechanisms enabling such a constructive relationship remain unclear. Employing an analysis of Public Interest Litigation against the Administration (PILA) in environmental protection cases in China, we present a theory of “bargaining in the shadow of judicial review.” The threat of imminent judicial review forces the administration to negotiate with the prosecutor and enhance its performance in exchange for dropping charges. Additionally, the effect of PILA is stronger in regions with more public environmental concern and weaker in regions where the higher-level public administration pays greater attention to environmental protection. Furthermore, we identify the impact of PILA on local governments’ enforcement efforts and its legitimacy. The present study sheds new light on the long-standing debate on managerialism versus legalism.

Keywords

administrative performance judicial review constructive relationship

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

S. E.

Buntaine

M. T.

Liu

Zhang

(2019). Non-governmental monitoring of local governments increases compliance with central mandates: A national-scale field experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science, 63(3), 626–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12428

Bazelon

D. L.

(1976). The impact of the courts on public administration. Indiana Law Journal, 52, 101–110. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/indana52&i=119

Brinkerhoff

D. W.

Wetterberg

(2016). Gauging the effects of social accountability on services, governance, and citizen empowerment. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12399

Callaway

Sant’Anna

P. H.

(2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of econometrics, 225(2), 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001

Carrigan

Mills

R. W.

(2019). Organizational process, rulemaking pace, and the shadow of judicial review. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 721–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13068

Chan

H. S.

Gao

(2009). Putting the cart before the horse: Accountability or performance? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68, S51–S61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00621.x

Christensen

R. K.

Goerdel

H. T.

Nicholson-Crotty

(2011). Management, law, and the pursuit of the public good in public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Supplement 1), i125–i140. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq065

Cooper

P. J.

(1985). Conflict or constructive tension: The changing relationship of judges and administrators. Public Administration Review, 45, 643–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/3135016

Crafts

(2006). Regulation and productivity performance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj012

10.

Ding

(2020). The people according to the Chinese communist party: Reinterpreting the party’s political theory. Modern China, 46(2), 193–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700419842338

11.

Ding

Appolloni

Shahzad

(2022). Environmental administrative penalty, corporate environmental disclosures and the cost of debt. Journal of Cleaner Production, 332, 129919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129919

12.

Evans

W. N.

Murray

S. E.

Schwab

R. M.

(1997). Schoolhouses, courthouses, and statehouses after Serrano. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(1), 10–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6688(199724)16:1<10::aid-pam2>3.0.co;2-l

13.

Finder

(1989). Like throwing an egg against a stone: Administrative litigation in the people's republic of China. Journal of Chinese Law, 3(1), 1–28. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/colas3&i=15

14.

Fisher

Pascual

Wagner

(2014). Rethinking judicial review of expert agencies. Texas Law Review, 93, 1681–1722. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tlr93&i=1761

15.

Galanter

(1983). The radiating effects of courts. In Boyum

K. O.

Mather

(Eds.), Empirical theories of courts (pp. 117–142). Longman.

16.

Gallas

E. C.

(1971). The court as a social force. Public Administration Review, 31(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/974663

17.

Ginsburgs

Stahnke

(1964). The genesis of the people's procuratorate in communist China 1949–1951. The China Quarterly, 20, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000048323

18.

Graham

B. L.

(2003). Explaining supreme court policymaking in civil rights: The influence of the solicitor general, 1953–2002. Policy Studies Journal, 31(2), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0072.00014

19.

Guarnieri

(1997). The judiciary in the Italian political crisis. West European Politics, 20, 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389708425179

20.

Guo

(2020). The politics of local justice expenditure in China. Chinese Political Science Review, 5(3), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00152-3

21.

Harriman

Straussman

J. D.

(1983). Do judges determine budget decisions? Federal court decisions in prison reform and state spending for corrections. Public Administration Review, 43(4), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/975837

22.

Hawkins

Rosete

A. A.

(2019). Judicialization and health policy in Colombia: The implications for evidence-informed policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 953–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12230

23.

(2013). Judicial innovation and local politics: Judicialization of administrative governance in east China. The China Journal, 69(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1086/668805

24.

Hennigar

M. A.

(2008). Conceptualizing attorney general conduct in charter litigation: From independence to central agency. Canadian Public Administration, 51(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00015.x

25.

Herrmann

(1973). The rule of compulsory prosecution and the scope of prosecutorial discretion in Germany. University of Chicago Law Review, 41, 468–505. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/uclr41&i=478 https://doi.org/10.2307/1599176

26.

Hodgson

(2001). The police, the prosecutor and the juge d'instruction: Judicial supervision in France, theory and practice. British Journal of Criminology, 41(2), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.2.342

27.

Chi

(2017). Study on the procedure before the administrative public interest litigation—based on the cases of experimental unit. Journal of National Prosecutors College, 25(02), 30–48. (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9428.2017.02.003

28.

Intoccia

G. F.

(2002). Reassessing judicial capacity to resolve complex questions of social policy. Journal of Legal Studies, 11, 127–154. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/usafa11&i=131

29.

Jones

E. S.

Taylor

C. P.

(1995). Litigating agency change. The impact of the courts and administrative appeals process on the forest service. Policy Studies Journal, 23(2), 310–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1995.tb01745.x

30.

Kagan

R. A.

(1991). Adversarial legalism and American government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(3), 369–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/3325322

31.

Kahn

M. E.

Kotchen

M. J.

(2011). Business cycle effects on concern about climate change: The chilling effect of recession. Climate Change Economics, 2(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010007811000292

32.

Karkkainen

B. C.

(2002). Toward a smarter NEPA: Monitoring and managing government's environmental performance. Columbia Law Review, 102(4), 903–972. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123648

33.

Kramarz

Cosolo

Rossi

(2017). Judicialization of environmental policy and the crisis of democratic accountability. Review of Policy Research, 34(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12218

34.

Laliberté

Lanteigne

(2008). The Chinese party-state in the 21st century. Routledge.

35.

Lam

J. C. K.

Cheung

L. Y. L.

Wang

V. O. K.

(2019). Stakeholder concerns of air pollution in Hong Kong and policy implications: A big-data computational text analysis approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.007

36.

(2022). Public participation in China: The case for environmental enforcement. Journal of Chinese Governance, 7(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2021.1968192

37.

Wang

(2019). From institutional interaction to institutional integration: The national supervisory commission and China's new anti-corruption model. The China Quarterly, 240, 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741019000596

38.

Liebman

B. L.

(2007). China's courts: Restricted reform. China Quarterly, 191, 620–638. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741007001610

39.

Limbocker

Resh

W. G.

Selin

J. L.

(2022). Anticipated adjudication: An analysis of the judicialization of the US administrative state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(3), 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab040

40.

Lynn

L. E.

(2009). Restoring the rule of law to public administration: What frank goodnow got right and leonard white didn't. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02030.x

41.

(2012). The rise of social accountability in China. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00770.x

42.

McKee Jr

C. V.

(1972). Commentary on the Chinese people's procuratorates. Journal of International Law and Economics, 7, 71–88. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/gwilr7&i=77

43.

Melnick

R. S.

(1985). The politics of partnership. Public Administration Review, 45, 653–660. https://doi.org/10.2307/3135017

44.

Mnookin

R. H.

Kornhauser

(1979). Bargaining in the Shadow of the law: The case of divorce. The Yale Law Journal, 88(5), 950–997. https://doi.org/10.2307/795824

45.

Moe

R. C.

Gilmour

R. S.

(1995). Rediscovering principles of public administration: The neglected foundation of public law. Public Administration Review, 55(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/977179

46.

Nie

Wang

(2023). Government responsiveness and citizen satisfaction: Evidence from environmental governance. Governance, 36(4), 1125–1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12723

47.

O'Brien

K. J.

(2004). Suing the local state: Administrative litigation in rural China. The China Journal, 51, 75–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3182147

48.

O'Leary

Wise

C. R.

(1991). Public managers, judges, and legislators: Redefining the “new partnership”. Public Administration Review, 51(4), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/976747

49.

Osorio

O’Leary

(2017). The impact of courts on public management: New insights from the legal literature. Administration & Society, 49(5), 658–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716682329

50.

Pavone

Stiansen

(2022). The shadow effect of courts: Judicial review and the politics of preemptive reform. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000873

51.

Pei

(1997). Citizens v. Mandarins: Administrative litigation in China. The China Quarterly, 152, 832–862. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000047573

52.

Richman

B. D.

(2012). Norms and law: Putting the horse before the cart. Duke Law Journal, 62(3), 739–766. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23364958

53.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(1983). Public administrative theory and the separation of powers. Public Administration Review, 43(3), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/976330

54.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(1987). Public administrators and the judiciary: The “new partnership”. Public Administration Review, 47(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/975474

55.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(2000). Retrofitting the administrative state to the constitution: Congress and the judiciary's twentieth century progress. Public Administration Review, 60(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00060

56.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(2019). Public administration and the erosion of the rule of law in the United States. Journal of Chinese Governance, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2018.1564490

57.

Shi

Guo

(2019). Do people have a negative impression of government on polluted days? Evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(5), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1443801

58.

Smith

L. A.

(1985). Judicialization: The twilight of administrative law. Duke Law Journal, 1985(2), 427–466. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372360

59.

Stevens

Moray

Bruneel

Clarysse

(2015). Attention allocation to multiple goals: The case of for-profit social enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2265

60.

Stewart

R. B.

(1974). The reformation of American administrative law. Harvard Law Review, 88(8), 1667–1813. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340207

61.

Straussman

J. D.

(1986). Courts and public purse strings: Have portraits of budgeting missed something? Public Administration Review, 46(4), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/976308

62.

Tang

Liu

(2016). Mandatory targets and environmental performance: An analysis based on regression discontinuity design. Sustainability, 8(9), 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090931

63.

Tate

C. N.

Vallinder

(1995). The global expansion of judicial power: The judicialization of politics. In Tate

Vallinder

(Eds.), The global expansion of judicial power (pp. 1–10). New York University Press.

64.

Terrill

R. J.

(2009). World Criminal Justice Systems: A Survey (7 ed.). Elsevier. ISBN 978-1-59345-612-2.

65.

Waldo

(1984). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of public administration. Holmes and Meier.

66.

Wang

(2014). Tying the autocrat's hands: The rise of the rule of law in China. Cambridge University Press.

67.

Wang

Xia

(2023). Judicializing environmental politics? China's procurator-led public interest litigation against the government. The China Quarterly, 253, 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741022001709

68.

Wise

C. R.

O'Leary

(2003). Breaking up is hard to do: The dissolution of judicial supervision of public services. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00278

69.

(2011). The fundamental institutions of China's reforms and development. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(4), 1076–1151. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.4.1076

70.

Yackee

J. W.

Yackee

S. W.

(2010). Administrative procedures and bureaucratic performance: Is federal rule-making “ossified"? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup011

71.

Yarbrough

T. E.

(1982). The judge as manager: The case of judge frank johnson. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.2307/3324356

72.

(2014). Strategic obedience: How Chinese courts advance administrative litigation. Tsinghua University Law Journal, 8, 103–124. in Chinese. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-9280.2014.04.006

73.

(2021). The meandering path of judicial reform with Chinese characteristics.”. In Ahl

(Ed.), Chinese Courts and Criminal Procedure: Post-2013 Reform (pp. 29–58). Cambridge University Press.

74.

Zeemering

E. S.

(2010). Guiding regionalism and reform from the court: Judge john feikens. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 792–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02206.x

75.

Zhang

(2021). Target interactions and target aspiration level adaptation: How do government leaders tackle the “environment-economy” nexus? Public Administration Review, 81(2), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut004

76.

Zhang

(2020). Performance targets, path dependence, and policy adoption: Evidence from the adoption of pollutant emission control policies in Chinese provinces. International Public Management Journal, 23(3), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1688209

77.

Zhou

(2022). The Logic of Governance in China: An Organizational Approach. Cambridge Univeresity Press.

78.

Zouridis

Leijtens

(2021). Bringing the law back in: The law-government nexus in an era of network governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 4(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa022