Recent debates in international relations increasingly focus on bureaucratic apparatuses of international organizations and highlight their role, influence, and autonomy in global public policy. In this contribution we follow the recent call made by Moloney and Rosenbloom in this journal to make use of “public administrative theory and empirically based knowledge in analyzing the behavior of international and regional organizations” and offer a systematic analysis of the inner structures of these administrative bodies. Changes in these structures can reflect both the (re-)assignment of responsibilities, competencies, and expertise, but also the (re)allocation of resources, staff, and corresponding signalling of priorities. Based on organizational charts, we study structural changes within 46 international bureaucracies in the UN system. Tracing formal changes to all internal units over two decades, this contribution provides the first longitudinal assessment of structural change at the international level. We demonstrate that the inner structures of international bureaucracies in the UN system became more fragmented over time but also experienced considerable volatility with periods of structural growth and retrenchment. The analysis also suggests that IO's political features yield stronger explanatory power for explaining these structural changes than bureaucratic determinants. We conclude that the politics of structural change in international bureaucracies is a missing piece in the current debate on international public administrations that complements existing research perspectives by reiterating the importance of the political context of international bureaucracies as actors in global governance.
AcharyaA. (2016). The future of global governance: Fragmentation may be inevitable and creative. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 22(4), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02204001
2.
AndewegR. B. (2000). Ministers as double agents? The delegation process between cabinet and ministers. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00518
3.
BadacheF. (2020). A representative bureaucracy perspective on workforce composition in international organizations: The case of the United Nations Secretariat. Public Administration, 98(2), 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12629
4.
BalintT. (2016). Administrativer Wandel in internationalen Organisationen: Reformdynamiken in der EU-Kommission und den Sekretariaten von FAO, OECD und WTO. Springer.
5.
BarnettM. N.FinnemoreM. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Cornell University Press.
6.
BauerM. W.KnillC. (eds.) (2007). Management reforms in international organizations (1st ed.). Nomos-Verlagsgesellschaft.
7.
BauerS. (2006). Does bureaucracy really matter? The authority of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2006.6.1.23
8.
BauerS.WeinlichS. (2011). International bureaucracies: Organizing world politics. In ReinaldaB. (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to non-state actors (pp. 251–262). Ashgate.
9.
BayerleinL.KnillC.SteinebachY. (2020). A matter of style?: Organizational agency in global public policy. Cambridge University Press.
10.
BellA.JonesK. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7
11.
BennerT.EckhardS.RotmannP. (2013). Learning in international organizations. In ReinaldaB. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of international organization (pp. 361–373). Routledge.
12.
BiermannF.PattbergP.van AsseltH.ZelliF. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14
13.
BiermannF.SiebenhünerB. (2009). Managers of global change the influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. MIT Press.
14.
BodeI. (2014). Francis deng and the concern for internally displaced persons: Intellectual leadership in the United Nations. Global Governance, 20(2), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02002007
15.
BodeI. (2015). Individual agency and policy change at the United Nations: The people of the United Nations. Routledge.
16.
CarrollB. J.BertelsJ.FroioC.KuipersS.Schulze-GabrechtenL.Viallet-ThéveninS. (2020). Between life and death: Organizational change in central state bureaucracies in cross-national comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, forthcoming (early view). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320964558
17.
ChristensenJ.YesilkagitK. (2019). International public administrations: A critique. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(6), 946–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1508245
18.
CoxR. W. (1969). The executive head: An essay on leadership in international organization. International Organization, 23(2), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830003157X
19.
CoxR. W.JacobsonH. K. (1973). The anatomy of influence: Decision making in international organization. Yale University Press.
20.
CroissantY.MilloG. (2008). Panel data econometrics in R: The plm package. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i02
21.
DijkzeulD.BeigbederY. (2003). Rethinking international organizations: Pathologies and promise. Berghahn Books.
22.
DingwerthK.KerwerD.NölkeA. (eds.). (2009). Die organisierte Welt: Internationale Beziehungen und Organisationsforschung. Nomos-Verlagsgesellschaft.
23.
EckhardS.EgeJ. (2016). International bureaucracies and their influence on policy-making: A review of empirical evidence. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 960–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162837
24.
FederoR.Saz-CarranzaA. (2020). A typology of board design for highly effective monitoring in intergovernmental organizations under the United Nations system. Regulation & Governance, 14(2), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12216
25.
FleischerJ.BezesP.JamesO.YesilkagitK. (2022). The politics of government reorganization in Western Europe. Governance, early view. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12670
26.
FleischerJuliaReinersNina (2021). Connecting International Relations and Public Administration: Toward A Joint Research Agenda for the Study of International Bureaucracy. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1230–1247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa097
27.
GiauqueD.Anderfuhren-BigetS.VaroneF. (2019). Stress and turnover intents in international organizations: Social support and work–life balance as resources. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(5), 879–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1254105
28.
GiauqueD.VaroneF. (2019). Work opportunities and organizational commitment in international organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12951
29.
GilardiF. (2002). Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory agencies: A comparative empirical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176022000046409
30.
GoetzK. H.PatzR. (2017). Resourcing international organizations: Resource diversification, organizational differentiation, and administrative governance. Global Policy, 8(S5), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12468
31.
GrahamE. R. (2014). International organizations as collective agents: Fragmentation and the limits of principal control at the world health organization. European Journal of International Relations, 20(2), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113476116
32.
GrigorescuA. (2007). Transparency of intergovernmental organizations: The roles of member states, international bureaucracies and nongovernmental organizations. International Studies Quarterly, 51(3), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00467.x
33.
HaackK. (2014). Breaking barriers? Women’s representation and leadership at the United Nations. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 20(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02001004
34.
HallN. (2016). Displacement, development, and climate change: International organizations moving beyond their mandates. Routledge.
35.
HallN.WoodsN. (2018). Theorizing the role of executive heads in international organizations. European Journal of International Relations, 24(4), 865–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117741676
36.
HanriederT. (2015). International organization in time: Fragmentation and reform (1st. ed.). Oxford University Press.
HardtH. (2018). Who matters for memory: Sources of institutional memory in international organization crisis management. The Review of International Organizations, 13(3), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-017-9281-4
39.
HawkinsD. G.LakeD. A.NielsonD. L.TierneyM. J. (2006). Delegation under anarchy: States, international organizations, and principal-agent theory. In HawkinsD. G. (Ed.), Delegation and agency in international organizations (pp. 3–21). Cambridge University Press.
40.
HirschmannG. (2012). Organizational learning in United Nations’ peacekeeping exit strategies. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(3), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836712445342
41.
HoogheL.MarksG.LenzT. (2019). A theory of international organization (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
42.
JohnsonT. (2013). Institutional design and bureaucrats’ impact on political control. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000953
43.
JohnsonT. (2014). Organizational progeny: Why governments are losing control over the proliferating structures of global governance (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
44.
JönssonC. (1986). Interorganization theory and international organization. International Studies Quarterly, 30(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600436
45.
JuncosA. E.PomorskaK. (2014). Manufacturing esprit de corps: The case of the European external action service. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12107
46.
KahlerM. (2001). Leadership selection in the major multilaterals. Institute for International Economics.
47.
KeohaneR. O. (1969). Institutionalization in the United Nations General Assembly. International Organization, 23(4), 859–896. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300025698
48.
KiewietD. R.McCubbinsM. D. (1991). The logic of delegation: Congressional parties and the appropriations process. University of Chicago Press.
49.
KilleK. J.ScullyR. M. (2003). Executive heads and the role of intergovernmental organizations: Expansionist leadership in the United Nations and the European Union. Political Psychology, 24(1), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00321
50.
KleineM. (2013). Informal governance in the European Union: How governments make international organizations work. Cornell University Press.
51.
KnillC.BauerM. W. (2018). Governance by international public administrations: Bureaucratic influence and global public policies. Routledge.
52.
KnillC.BayerleinL.EnklerJ.GrohsS. (2019). Bureaucratic influence and administrative styles in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 14(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9303-x
53.
KuipersS.YesilkagitK.CarrollB. (2018). Coming to terms with termination of public organizations. Public Organization Review, 18(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0376-4
54.
LenzT.BezuijenJ.HoogheL.MarksG. (2014). Patterns of international organization: Task specific vs. general purpose. In da Conceição-HeldtE.KochM.LieseA. (Eds.), Politische Vierteljahreschrift Sonderheft 49/2014: Internationale Organisationen: Autonomie, Politisierung, interorganisationale Beziehungen und Wandel (pp. 136–161). Nomos-Verlagsgesellschaft.
55.
LenzT.BurilkovA.ViolaL. A. (2019). Legitimacy and the cognitive sources of international institutional change: The case of regional parliamentarization. International Studies Quarterly, 63(4), 1094–1107. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz051
Littoz-MonnetA. (2017). The politics of expertise in international organizations: How international bureaucracies produce and mobilize knowledge. Routledge.
58.
MacCarthaighM.RonessP. G. (2012). Analyzing longitudinal continuity and change in public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(12), 773–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.715567
59.
ManulakM. W. (2017). Leading by design: Informal influence and international secretariats. The Review of International Organizations, 12(4), 497–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-016-9245-0
60.
Martinez-DiazL. (2009). Boards of directors in international organizations: A framework for understanding the dilemmas of institutional design. The Review of International Organizations, 4(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-009-9061-x
61.
MoloneyK.RosenbloomD. H. (2020). Creating space for public administration in international organization studies. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(3), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019888498
62.
MouritzenH. (1990). The international civil service: A study of bureaucracy: International organizations. Dartmouth.
63.
NayO. (2011). What drives reforms in international organizations? External pressure and bureaucratic entrepreneurs in the UN response to aids. Governance, 24(4), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01545.x
64.
NovosadP.WerkerE. (2019). Who runs the international system? Nationality and leadership in the United Nations Secretariat. The Review of International Organizations, 14(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-017-9294-z
65.
ParízekM. (2017). Control, soft information, and the politics of international organizations staffing. The Review of International Organizations, 12(4), 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-016-9252-1
66.
PatzR.GoetzK. H. (2019). Managing money and discord in the UN: Budgeting and bureaucracy. Oxford University Press.
67.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
68.
PollittC. (1984). Manipulating the machine: Changing the pattern of ministerial departments, 1960-83. G. Allen & Unwin.
69.
PrzeworskiA. (1999). On the design of the state: A principal-agent perspective. In Bresser PereiraL. C.SpinkP. (Eds.), Reforming the state: Managerial public administration in Latin America (pp. 15–40). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
70.
ReinaldaB. (2019). Transregional dynamics and cultures of international organizations. In MiddellM. (Ed.), The routledge handbook of transregional studies (pp. 350–357). Routledge.
71.
ReinaldaB.KilleK. J. (2017). The evolvement of international secretariats, executive heads and leadership in inter-organizational relations. In KoopsJ. A.BiermannR. (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics (pp. 217–242). Palgrave.
72.
ReinaldaB.VerbeekB. (1998). Autonomous policy making by international organizations: Purpose, outline and results. In ReinaldaB.VerbeekB. (Eds.), Autonomous policy making by international organizations (pp. 1–8). Routledge.
73.
RocabertJ.SchimmelfennigF.CrasnicL.WinzenT. (2019). The rise of international parliamentary institutions: Purpose and legitimation. The Review of International Organizations, 14(4), 607–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9326-3
74.
RollandV. W.RonessP. G. (2011). Mapping organizational change in the state: Challenges and classifications. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(6), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.572693
75.
SchönfeldM.EckhardS.PatzR.van MeegdenburgH. (2019). The UN Security Council debates 1995–2017.
76.
SchroederM. B. (2014). Executive leadership in the study of international organization: A framework for analysis. International Studies Review, 16(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12147
77.
StoneR. W. (2013). Informal governance in international organizations: Introduction to the special issue. The Review of International Organizations, 8(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-013-9168-y
78.
StrømK. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00513
79.
TallbergJ.SommererT.SquatritoT.JönssonC. (2013). The opening up of international organizations: Transnational access in global governance. Cambridge University Press.
80.
TrondalJ. (2010). Unpacking international organisations: The dynamics of compound bureaucracies. Manchester University Press.
81.
TrondalJ. (2011). Bureaucratic structure and administrative behaviour: Lessons from international bureaucracies. West European Politics, 34(4), 795–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.572392
82.
United Nations Department of Global Communications (UNDGC) (2019). The United Nations system. New York: UN.
83.
WeissT. G. (1982). International bureaucracy: The myth and reality of the international civil service. International Affairs, 58(2), 287–306. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i324632
84.
YesilkagitK.FleischerJ.BezesP. (2021). What’s in a name? The politics of name change inside bureaucracy. Public Administration, early view. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12827
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
