The commentary addresses the government’s role in mitigating information asymmetry problems during pandemic crisis response. We use the outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China, as a case to show the use of social media as a key mechanism in shaping the actions of the central government in its coordination with the local governments during the pandemic response. The Chinese government effectively collaborated with a social media platform to not only create a dedicated channel to allow citizens to post information about the pandemic to accelerate the speed of relief but also mobilize citizens and nonprofit organizations to support government response and recovery efforts. This suggests that social media can provide a venue for the government to not only tackle the information overload but also mitigate the friction among levels of governments.
ChenJ.PanJ.XuY. (2016). Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: A field experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 383–400.
7.
ComfortL. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67(S1), 189–197.
8.
ComfortL. K.ZhangH. (2020). Operational networks: Adaptation to extreme events in China. Risk Analysis, 40(5), 981–1000.
9.
DruryA. C.OlsonR. S. (1998). Disasters and political unrest: An empirical investigation. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6(3), 153–161.
HuQ.KapucuN. (2016). Information communication technology utilization for effective emergency management networks. Public Management Review, 18(3), 323–348.
14.
JonesB. D. (1999). Bounded rationality. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 297–321.
15.
KapucuN. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207–225.
16.
KimK. (2017). How did South Korean governments respond during 2015 MERS outbreak? Application of the adaptive governance framework. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 16(1), 69–81.
17.
KingG.PanJ.RobertsM. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343.
18.
KingG.PanJ.RobertsM. E. (2014). Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation. Science, 345(6199), 1251722.
LiY. (2018). A long march for survival: The internet, social media and government accountability in China [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Hong Kong].
21.
LieberthalK. (1995). Governing China: From revolution through reform. W.W. Norton.
22.
LieberthalK.LamptonD. M. (1992). Bureaucracy, politics, and decision making in post-Mao China. University of California Press.
23.
LorentzenP. (2014). China’s strategic censorship. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 402–414.
24.
LuX.XueL. (2016). Managing the unexpected: Sense-making in the Chinese emergency management system. Public Administration, 94(2), 414–429.
25.
MergelI. (2012). Social media in the public sector: A guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in the networked world. Jossey-Bass.
PellingM.DillK. (2010). Disaster politics: Tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes. Progress in Human Geography, 34(1), 21–37.
SimonH. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason. MIT Press.
30.
SuZ.MengT. (2016). Selective responsiveness: Online public demands and government responsiveness in authoritarian China. Social Science Research, 59, 52–67.
31.
WalgraveS.DejaeghereY. (2017). Surviving information overload: How elite politicians select information. Governance, 30(2), 229–244.
32.
WillP.WongR. B.LeeJ. Z. (1991). Nourish the people: The state civilian granary system in China, 1650-1850. Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan.
33.
WongR. B.PerdueP. C. (1983). Famine’s foes in Ch’ing China. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 43(1), 291–332.
34.
WukichC.HuQ.SicilianoM. D. (2019). Cross-sector emergency information networks on social media: Online bridging and bonding communication patterns. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(7), 825–839.
