Does Contracting Achieve Better Performance for Democratic-Constitutional,Procedural Tasks? Evidence From the EEO Discrimination Complaint Process

Abstract

Contracting out has been considered one of the main performance management strategies to reduce costs and bring more expertise to government agencies. However, there is a lack of research assessing the performance of contractors compared with that of in-house agency employees, when both contractors and public employees deliver complex services. This study examines whether or not contracting achieves better performance in democratic-constitutional, procedural (DCP) tasks compared with in-house delivery, by analyzing contracting use in the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) discrimination complaint process. Using agency-level panel data from the Federal EEO Statistical Report of Discrimination Complaints, combined with data from the Federal Procurement Data System and the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, the study offers evidence resolving the competing logics for a relationship between contracting use and performance in DCP tasks. The findings show that an increase in contracting is associated with a decrease in timely completion of case investigations, which is a key measure of DCP task performance.

Keywords

contracting performance democratic-constitutional procedural tasks mission-extrinsic public values

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alonso

J. M.

Andrews

(2016). How privatization affects public service quality: An empirical analysis of prisons in England and Wales, 1998–2012. International Public Management Journal, 19(2), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1048913

Amirkhanyan

A. A.

(2011). What is the effect of performance measurement on perceived accountability effectiveness in state and local government contracts? Public Performance & Management Review, 35(2), 303–339. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576350204

Baehler

Liu

A. C.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(2014). Mission-extrinsic public values as an extension of regime values: Examples from the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Administration & Society, 46(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713515873

Bennett

J. T.

Johnson

M. H.

(1981). Better government at half the price: Private production of public services. Caroline House.

Boitani

Nicolini

Scarpa

(2011). Do competition and ownership matter? Evidence from local public transport in Europe. Applied Economics, 45(11), 1419–1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.617702

Brown

T. L.

Potoski

(2003). Contract-management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 153–164. http://www.jstor.org/stable/977587

Brown

T. L.

Potoski

Van Slyke

D. M.

(2006). Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 323–331. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3843914

Brown

T. L.

Potoski

Van Slyke

D. M.

(2016). Managing complex contracts: A theoretical approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv004

Brown

T. L.

Potoski

Van Slyke

D. M.

(2018). Complex contracting: Management challenges and solutions. Public Administration Review, 78(5), 739–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12959

10.

Choi

(2017). Workforce diversity and job satisfaction of the majority and the minority: Analyzing the asymmetrical effects of relational demography on whites and racial/ethnic minorities. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15623617

11.

Davis

R. S.

Girth

A. M.

Stazyk

E. C.

(2016). Social and technical determinants of perceived contract performance: Rules, autonomy, and ethics. Public Performance and Management Review, 39(3), 728–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1137773

12.

DeHoog

R. H.

(1985). Human services contracting: Environmental, behavioral, and organizational conditions. Administration & Society, 16(4), 427–454.

13.

Fernandez

(2004). Explaining contracting effectiveness: An empirical analysis of contracting for services among local governments. The University of Georgia.

14.

Fernandez

Brudney

J. L.

(2008). Exploring variations in contracting for services among American local governments: Do politics still matter? The American Review of Public Administration, 38(4), 439–462.

15.

Fernandez

Smith

C. R.

(2005). Looking for evidence of public employee opposition to privatization: An empirical study with implications for practice. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26(4), 356–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X05281629

16.

Frederickson

H. G.

(1990). Public administration and social equity. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 228–237. http://www.jstor.org/stable/976870

17.

Frederickson

H. G.

(2016). Toward a new public administration. In Shafritz

J. M.

Hyde

A. C.

(Eds.), Classics of public administration (8th ed., pp. 282–294). Cengage Learning.

18.

Girth

A. M.

(2017). Incentives in third-party governance: Management practices and accountability implications. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12645

19.

Girth

A. M.

Lopez

L. E.

(2019). Contract design, complexity, and incentives: Evidence from U.S. federal agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(3), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018787558

20.

Globerman

Vining

A. R.

(1996). A framework for evaluating the government contracting-out decision with an application to information technology. Public Administration Review, 56(6), 577–586.

21.

Hart

Shleifer

Vishny

R. W.

(1997). The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1126–1161. https://doi.org/10.1628/0932456012974558

22.

Hatry

H. P.

(2007). Performance measurement. Rowman & Littlefield.

23.

Hefetz

Warner

(2004). Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh012

24.

Hirsch

W. Z.

Osborne

(2000). Privatization of government services: Pressure-group resistance and service transparency. Journal of Labor Research, 21(2), 315–326. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12122-000-1050-z.pdf

25.

Jang

Eger

R. J.

(2019). The effects of state delinquent tax collection outsourcing on administrative effectiveness, efficiency, and procedural fairness. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(2), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018759435

26.

Jung

Malatesta

LaLonde

R. J.

(2018). Should government go it alone or with a partner? A comparison of outcomes from a work release program using different policy tools. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12948

27.

Kavanagh

Parker

(2000). Managing the contract: A transaction cost analysis of externalisation. Local Government Studies, 26(4), 1–22.

28.

Kelman

S. J.

(2002). Contracting. In Salamon

L. M.

(Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 282–318). Oxford University Press.

29.

Lannier

A. L.

Porcher

(2014). Efficiency in the public and private French water utilities: Prospects for benchmarking. Applied Economics, 46(5), 556–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.857002

30.

Lee

G. R.

Lee

Malatesta

Fernandez

(2019). Outsourcing and organizational performance: The employee perspective. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(8), 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019855469

31.

Lipnic

V. A.

(2017). Testimony before Committee on House Administration “Preventing Sexual Harassment in the Congressional Workplace: Examining Reforms to the Congressional Accountability Act.” https://cha.house.gov/hearing/preventing-sexual-harassment-congressional-workplace-examining-reforms-congressional

32.

Malatesta

Smith

(2014). Designing contracts for complex services. Public Administration, 92(3), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12004

33.

Moynihan

D. P.

Fernandez

Kim

Leroux

K. M.

Piotrowski

S. J.

Wright

B. E.

Yang

(2011). Performance regimes amidst governance complexity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 1), i141–i155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq059

34.

O’Toole

L. J.

Meier

K. J.

(2004). Parkinson’s law and the new public management? Contracting determinants and service-quality consequences in public education. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 342–352. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3542599

35.

Papke

L. E.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 619–632.

36.

Petersen

O. H.

Baekkeskov

Potoski

Brown

T. L.

(2019). Measuring and managing ex ante transaction costs in public sector contracting. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13048

37.

Piotrowski

(2007). The impact of contracting. In Governmental transparency in the path of administration reform (pp. 75–88). State University of New York Press.

38.

Piotrowski

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(2002). Nonmission-based values in results-oriented public management: The case of freedom of information. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 643–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00247

39.

Piotrowski

Rosenbloom

D. H.

Kang

Ingrams

(2018). Levels of value integration in federal agencies’ mission and value statements: Is open government a performance target of U.S. Federal Agencies? Public Administration Review, 78(5), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12937

40.

Radin

B. A.

(2000). The Government Performance and Results Act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024260

41.

Radin

B. A.

(2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Georgetown University Press.

42.

Romzek

B. S.

Johnston

J. M.

(2002). Effective contract implementation and management: A preliminary model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(3), 423–453. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3525732

43.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(2007). Reinventing administrative prescriptions: The case for democratic-constitutional impact statements and scorecards. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 28–39.

44.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(2017). Beyond efficiency: Value frameworks for public administration. Chinese Public Administration Review, 8(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v8i1.143

45.

Rubin

E. V.

Park

Y. J.

Alteri

(2017). Understanding the link between retaliation claims and agency EEO resources in the federal government.

46.

Savas

E. S.

(1982). Privatizing the public sector: How to shrink governments. Chatham House.

47.

Smith

C. R.

Fernandez

(2010). Equity in federal contracting: Examining the link between minority representation and federal procurement decisions. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 87–96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40469113

48.

Stivers

(2008). The significance of the administrative state. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 53–56.

49.

Thompson

(2011). The estimated cost impact of privatizing student transportation in Minnesota school districts. Public Choice, 146(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9592-y

50.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2014). Annual report on the federal work force part I: EEO complaints processing.

51.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2017). Laws enforced by EEOC. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/

52.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2009). EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY: Pilot projects could help test solutions to long-standing concerns with the EEO complaint process. https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09712.pdf

53.

Van Slyke

D. M

. (2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 296–315. http://www.jstor.org/stable/977489

54.

Van Slyke

D. M.

Hammonds

C. A

. (2003). The privatization decision: Do public managers make a difference? American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074003251374

55.

Van Slyke

D. M.

Roch

C. H

. (2004). What do they know, and whom do they hold accountable? Citizens in the government-nonprofit contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh013

56.

Waldo

(1948). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration. Routledge.

57.

Wood

A. K.

Lewis

D. E.

(2017). Agency performance challenges and agency politicization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4), 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux014

58.

Yang

Hsieh

J. Y.

T. S.

(2009). Contracting capacity and perceived contracting performance: Nonlinear effects and the role of time. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 681–696. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27697914