To date, there has been limited research conducted on disaster aid allocation across multiple regions and disasters within the United States. In addition, there is a paucity of research specifically connecting social indicators of vulnerability to public assistance grants aimed at restoring, rebuilding, and mitigating against future damages in disasters. Given these gaps, this article inquires as to whether the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA’s) public assistance program is characterized by procedural inequities, or disparate outcomes for counties with more socially vulnerable populations. Specifically, this article analyzes county-level FEMA’s Public Assistance distribution following major disaster declarations, while controlling for damages sustained, population, household counts, and FEMA Region. Results indicate that FEMA’s Public Assistance program operates well when accounting only for disaster losses across the years, however, findings also show that county social conditions influence funding receipt. Although socioeconomic characteristics were significant drivers of assistance spending, additional vulnerability indicators related to county demographic and built environment characteristics were also important drivers of receipt. Cases of both procedural inequity and equity are highlighted, and implications for equitable disaster recovery are discussed along with recommendations.
BolinB.KurtzL. (2018). Race, class, and ethnicity. In HavidánR.WilliamD.TrainorJ. E. (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research, 2nd Ed. (pp. 181-203). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
2.
BolinR.StanfordL. (2006). The Northridge earthquake: Vulnerability and disaster. New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BowenW. M.WellsM. V. (2002). The politics and reality of environmental justice: A history and considerations for public administrators and policy makers. Public Administration Review, 62, 688-698.
4.
BryantB.MohaiP. (1992). Race and the incidence of environmental hazards. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
BullardR. D. (2005). The quest for environmental justice: Human rights and the politics of pollution. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Book Clubs.
6.
BullardR. D. (2008). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
7.
BullardR. D.WrightB. (2012). The wrong complexion for protection: How the government response to disaster endangers African American communities. New York, NY: University Press.
8.
BurdaM.HardingM. (2014). Environmental justice: Evidence from Superfund cleanup durations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Part A, 107, 380-401.
9.
ColeL. W.FosterS. R. (2001). From the ground up: Environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. New York, NY: New York University Press.
10.
ComfortL. K.BirklandT. A.CiglerB. A.NanceE. (2010). Retrospectives and prospectives on Hurricane Katrina: Five years and counting. Public Administration Review, 70, 669-678.
11.
CraemerT. (2010). Evaluating racial disparities in Hurricane Katrina relief using direct trailer counts in New Orleans and FEMA Records. Public Administration Review, 70, 367-377.
12.
CutterS. L.BoruffB. J.ShirleyW. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 242-261.
13.
CutterS. L.EmrichC. T. (2006). Moral hazard, social catastrophe: The changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604, 102-112.
14.
DaleyD. M.LaytonD. F. (2004). Policy implementation and the Environmental Protection Agency: What factors influence remediation at Superfund sites?The Policy Studies Journal, 32, 375-392.
15.
DurantR. F.RosenbloomD. H. (2017). The hollowing of American public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 719-736.
16.
ElliotJ. R.PaisJ. (2010). When nature pushes back: Environmental impact and the spatial redistribution of socially vulnerable populations. Social Science Quarterly, 9, 1187-1202.
FinchC.EmrichC. T.CutterS. L. (2010). Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans. Population and Environment, 31, 179-202.
19.
FothergillA.MaestasE. G. M.DarlingtonJ. D. (1999). Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters, 23, 156-173.
20.
FothergillA.PeekL. A. (2004). Poverty and disasters in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings. Natural Hazards, 32, 89-110.
21.
FotovvatH. (2013). Investigation of social based cooperatives on social health of female headed households. Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 146-150.
22.
GallM.BordenK.A.CutterS. (2009). When do losses count?: Six fallacies of natural hazards loss data. American Meteorological Society, 90, 799-809.
23.
GanapatiE. N. (2012). In good company: Why social capital matters for women during disaster recovery. Public Administration Review, 72, 419-427.
24.
GoodenS. T. (2015). From equality to social equity. In GuyM. E.RubinM. M. (Eds.), Public administration evolving: From foundations to the future (pp. 211-231). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
GothamK. (2012). Disasters Inc., privatization and post-Katrina rebuilding in New Orleans. Perspectives on Politics, 10, 633-646.
26.
GothamK. F.CampanellaR. (2011). Coupled vulnerability and resilience: The dynamics of cross-scale interactions in post-Katrina New Orleans. Ecology and Society, 16(3), Article 12. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss3/art12/
27.
GuyM. E.McCandlessS. A. (2012). Social equity: Its legacy, its promise. Public Administration Review, 72, 5-13.
28.
HarrisonJ. L. (2011). Pesticide drift and the pursuit of environmental justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
HarrisonJ. L. (2014). Neoliberal environmental justice: Mainstream ideas of justice in political conflict over agricultural pesticides in the United States. Environmental Politics, 23, 650-669.
30.
HarrisonJ. L. (2016). Bureaucrats’ tacit understandings and social movement policy implementation: Unpacking the deviation of agency environmental justice programs from EJ movement priorities. Social Problems, 63, 534-553.
31.
Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (HVRI). (2016a). The Social Vulnerability Index, Version 15.2 [Online Database]. Columbia: University of South Carolina. Available from http://www.sovius.org
32.
Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (HVRI). (2016b). The Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database for the United States, Version 15.2 [Online Database]. Columbia: University of South Carolina. Available from http://www.sheldus.org
33.
HolifieldR. (2004). Neoliberalism and environmental justice in the United States Environmental Protection Agency: Translating policy into managerial practice in hazardous waste remediation. Geoforum, 35, 285-297.
34.
HooksJ. P.MillerT. B. (2006). Continuing storm: How disaster recovery excludes those most in need. California Western Law Review, 43, 21-74.
35.
JohnstonB. J.GoerdelH. T.LavichN. P.Jr.PierceJ. C. (2015). Social capital and emergency management planning: A test of community context and effects on formal and informal collaboration. American Review of Public Administration, 45, 476-493.
36.
KettlD. F. (2006). Is the worst yet to come?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604, 273-287.
37.
KlinenbergE. (2002). Heat wave: A social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
38.
KruegerS.JenningsE.KendraJ. (2009). Local emergency management funding: An evaluation of county budgets. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6(1). doi:10.2202/1547-7355.143
39.
LavelleM.CoyleM. (1992). Unequal protection: The racial divide in environmental law. National Law Journal, 15, S1-S12S.
40.
MartinL. L.LeveyM. R.CawleyJ. (2012). The “new normal” for local government. State and Local Government Review, 44(1_Suppl.), 17S-28S.
41.
MohaiP.PellowD.TimmonsR. J. (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 34, 405-430.
42.
MooreD. S.KirklandS. (2007). The basic practice of statistics. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
43.
Morello-FroschR. A. (2002). Discrimination and the political economy of environmental inequality. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 20, 477-496.
44.
MorrowB. H. (1999). Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters, 23, 1-18.
45.
MullerC.SampsonR. J.WinterA. S. (2018). Environmental inequality: The social causes and consequences of lead exposure. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 263-282.
46.
MuñozC. E.TateE. (2016). Unequal recovery? Federal resource distribution after a Midwest flood disaster. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13, 507-517. doi:10.3390/ijerph13050507
47.
Murphy-GreeneC.LeipL. A. (2002). Assessing the effectiveness of Executive Order 12898: Environmental justice for all?Public Administration Review, 62, 679-687.
48.
NorrisF. H.FriedmanM. J.WatsonP. J.ByrneC. M. (2002). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981-2001. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 65, 207-239.
49.
NowellB.SteelmanT.VelezA. L. K.YangZ. (2018). The structure of effective governance of disaster response networks: Insights from the field. The American Review of Public Administration, 4, 8699-8715.
50.
O’NeilS. G. (2007). Superfund: Evaluating the impact of Executive Order 12898. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115, 1087-1093.
51.
PeacockW. G.GladwinH.MorrowB. H. (2012). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters. New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
PeacockW. G.Van ZandtS.ZangY.HighfieldW. E. (2014). Inequities in long-term housing recovery after disasters. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80, 356-371.
53.
PearsallH.PierceJ. (2017). A spoiled well (of data): Addressing the procedural injustice of contemporary environmental justice research through collaborative qualitative data gathering. Local Environment, 22, 388-392.
54.
PeekL. (2013). Age. In ThomasD. S. K.PhillipsB. D.LovekampW. E.FothergillA. (Eds.), Social vulnerability to disasters, 2nd Ed. (pp.167-198). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
55.
PellowD. (2000). Environmental inequality formation: Toward a theory of environmental injustice. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 581-601.
56.
PellowD. (2017). What is critical environmental justice?Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
57.
PetrieM. (2006). Environmental justice in the South: An analysis of the determinants and consequences of community involvement in Superfund. Sociological Spectrum, 26, 471-489.
58.
PlattR. H. (1999). Disasters and democracy: The politics of extreme natural events. Washington, DC: Island Press.
59.
PulidoL. (2015). Geographies of race and ethnicity 1: White supremacy vs white privilege in environmental racism research. Progress in Human Geography, 39, 809-817.
60.
ReidM. (2010). Gender and race in the history of housing policy and research: From industrialization to Hurricane Katrina. Sociology Compass, 4, 180-192.
61.
ReidM. (2013). Disasters and social inequalities. Sociology Compass, 7, 984-997.
62.
RiveraJ. D. (2017). Accessing disaster recovery resource information: Reliance on social capital in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. In CompanionM.ChaikenM. (Eds.), Responses to disasters and climate change: Understanding vulnerability and fostering resilience (pp. 61-70). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
RumbachA.MakarewiczC.NémethJ. (2016). The Importance of place in early disaster recovery: A case study of the 2013 Colorado floods. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59, 2045-2063.
65.
SchlosbergD. (1999). Environmental justice and the new pluralism: The challenge of difference for environmentalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
66.
SchlosbergD. (2009). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
SmithG. (2012). Planning for post-disaster recovery: A review of the United States disaster assistance framework. Washington, DC: Island Press.
69.
ThomasD. S. K.PhillipsB. D.LovekampW. E.FothergillA. (2013). Social vulnerability to disasters (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
70.
TierneyK. (2006). Social inequality, hazards, and disasters. In KettlD. F.DanielsR. J.KunreutherH. (Eds.), On risk and disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina (pp. 129-152). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
71.
TierneyK.LindellM. K.PerryR. W. (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
72.
TomesW. (2011). Impact of the economic downturn on local governments in South Carolina. Georgia Journal of Public Policy, 1(3), 1-11.
73.
VerchickR. M. (2012). Disaster justice: The geography of human capability. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, 23, 23-71.
74.
WisnerB.BlaikieP.CannonT.DavisI. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. New York, NY: Routledge.
ZhangY.PeacockW. G. (2009). Planning for housing recovery? Lessons learned from Hurricane Andrew. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 5-24.
