Since the creation of Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA) in 1964 and AmeriCorps in 1993, a stated goal of national service programs has been to strengthen the overall health of communities across the United States. But whether national service programs have such community effects remains an open question. Using longitudinal cross-lagged panel and change-score models from 2005 to 2013, this study explores whether communities with national service programs exhibit greater subjective well-being. We use novel measures of subjective well-being derived from tweeted expressions of emotions, engagement, and relationships in 1,347 U.S. counties. Results show that national service programs improve subjective well-being primarily by mitigating threats to well-being and communities that exhibit more engagement are better able to attract national service programs. Although limited in size, these persistent effects are robust to multiple threats to inference and provide important new evidence on how national service improves communities in the United States.
Aguirre International. (1996). Making a difference: Impact of AmeriCorps state and national direct on members and communities 1994-1995 and 1995-1996. San Mateo, CA: Author.
2.
AhujaA.WeiW.WeiL.KathleenM. C.ChandanK. R. (2017). A probabilistic geographical aspect-opinion model for geo-tagged microblogs. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (pp. 721-726). IEEE.
3.
AllisonP. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93-114.
4.
ArgyleM. (2013). The psychology of happiness. London, UK: Routledge.
5.
BailC. (2017). Taming big data: Using app technology to study organizational behavior on social media. Sociological Methods & Research, 46, 189-217.
6.
BailC.BrownT. W.MannM. (2017). Channeling hearts and minds: Advocacy organizations, cognitive-emotional currents, and public conversation. American Sociological Review, 82, 1188-1213.
7.
BassM. (2013). The politics and civics of national service: Lessons from the civilian conservation corps, VISTA, and AmeriCorps. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
8.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289-300.
9.
BhartiS. K.VachhaB.PradhanR. K.BabuK. S.JenaS. K. (2016). Sarcastic sentiment detection in tweets streamed in real time: A big data approach. Digital Communications and Networks, 2, 108-121.
10.
BjørnskovC. (2003). The happy few: Cross-country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kyklos, 56(1), 3-16.
11.
BollenJ.GonçalvesB.RuanG.MaoH. (2011). Happiness is assortative in online social networks. Artificial Life, 17, 237-251.
12.
BoydD.CrawfordK. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 662-679.
13.
BlanchflowerD. G.AndrewJ. O. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-8), 1359-1386.
14.
BrowerR. S.BerryF. S. (2006). On the success of AmeriCorps programs in strengthening communities: Evidence from Florida. International Journal of Public Administration, 29, 849-871.
15.
ChaskinR. J.BrownP.VenkateshS.VidalA. (2001). Community capacity and capacity building: A definitional framework. In ChaskinR. J. (Ed.), Building community capacity (pp. 7-26). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
16.
CheckowayB. (1997). Institutional impacts of AmeriCorp on the university of Michigan. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 2, 70-79.
DavidovDmitryTsurOrenRappoportAri. “Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in twitter and amazon.” Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on computational natural language learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.
24.
DavisK. D.WeaverJ. H. (1998). Lessons from the field: The Colorado healthy communities initiative: A report for the Colorado trust. Denver, CO: Colorado Trust.
25.
DienerE. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.
26.
DienerE.DienerC. (1995). The wealth of nations revised: Income and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 36, 275-286.
27.
DienerE.LucasR. E.OishiS.SuhE. M. (2002). Looking up and looking down: Weighting good and bad information in life satisfaction judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 437-445.
28.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302.
29.
DiGraziaJ.McKelveyK.BollenJ.RojasF. (2013). More Tweets, more votes: Social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PLoS ONE, 8, e79449.
30.
DimaggioP. (2002). Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector on society is probably impossible but possibly useful. In FlynnP.HodgkinsonV. A. (Eds.), Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector (pp. 249-272). Boston, MA: Springer.
31.
DolanP.PeasgoodT.WhiteM. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94-122.
32.
EasterlinR. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35-47.
33.
EichstaedtJ. C.SchwartzH. A.KernM. L.ParkG.LabartheD. R.MerchantR. M.. . . SeligmanM. E. (2015). Psychological language on Twitter predicts county-level heart disease mortality. Psychological Science, 26, 159-169.
34.
FinkelS. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
FinlayA. K.FlanaganC.Wray-LakeL. (2011). Civic engagement patterns and transitions over 8 years: The AmeriCorps national study. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1728-1743.
36.
FloresR. D. (2017). Do anti-immigrant laws shape public sentiment? A study of Arizona’s SB 1070 using Twitter data. American Journal of Sociology, 123(2), 333-384.
37.
FrumkinP.JastrzabJ.VaalerM.GreeneyA.GrimmR. T.JrCramerK.DietzN. (2009). Inside national service: AmeriCorps’ impact on participants. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 394-416.
38.
GalsonW. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217-234.
GuoB. (2012). Material assistance: Who is helped by nonprofits?Social Work Research, 36, 167-179.
42.
HelliwellF. A.PutnamR. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1435-1446.
43.
HelliwellJ. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modeling, 20, 331-360.
44.
HelliwellJ. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital, and public policy: What’s new?The Economic Journal, 116, C34-C45.
45.
HelliwellJ. F.AkninL. B.ShiplettH.HuangH.WangS. (2017). Social capital and prosocial behaviour as sources of well-being (No. w23761). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
46.
HollandP. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945-960.
47.
HudsonJ. (2006). Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU. KYKLOS, 59(1), 43-62.
48.
HughesD. J.RoweM.BateyM.LeeA. (2012). A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 561-569.
49.
HuntoonL. (2001). Government use of nonprofit organizations to build social capital. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(2), 157-160.
50.
JohnsonJ.HowleyC. B. (2015). Contemporary federal education policy and rural schools: A critical policy analysis. Peabody Journal of Education, 90, 224-241.
51.
JohnsonD. (2005). Two-wave panel analysis: Comparing statistical methods for studying the effects of transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 1061-1075.
52.
JordanB. (2009). Blurring boundaries: The “real” and the “virtual” in hybrid spaces. Human Organization, 181-193.
53.
KahnemanD.KruegerA. B.SchkadeD.SchwarzN.StoneA. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. The American Economic Review, 94, 429-434.
54.
KeyesC. L.ShmotkinD.RyffC. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007-1022.
55.
KimT.AtkinD. J.LinC. A. (2016). The influence of social networking sites on political behavior: Modeling Political involvement via online and offline activity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 23-39.
KleinC. (2013). Social capital or social cohesion: What matters for subjective well-being?Social Indicators Research, 110, 891-911.
58.
LandK. C. (2002). Social indicators for assessing the impact of the independent, not-for-profit sector of society. In FlynnP.HodgkinsonV. A. (Eds.), Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector (pp. 59-76). Springer.
59.
LeeR.WakamiyaS.SumiyaK. (2011). Discovery of unusual regional social activities using geo-tagged microblogs. World Wide Web, 14, 321-349.
60.
LenkowskyL. (2014). The politics and civics of national service: Lessons from the civilian conservation corps, VISTA, and AmeriCorps, by MelissaBass, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2013, 304 pp., $32.95, hardback. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 241-244.
61.
LiuB. F.WoodM. M.EgnotoM.BeanH.SuttonJ.MiletiD.MaddenS. (2017). Is a picture worth a thousand words? The effects of maps and warning messages on how publics respond to disaster information. Public Relations Review, 43, 493-506.
62.
MalikM. M.LambaH.NakosC.PfefferJ. (2015). Population bias in geotagged tweets. People, 1, 3-759.
63.
McBrideA. M.GonzalesE.Morrow-HowellN.McCraryS. (2011). Stipends in volunteer civic service: Inclusion, retention, and volunteer benefits. Public Administration Review, 71, 850-858.
64.
McBrideA. M.GreenfieldJ. C.Morrow-HowellN.LeeY. S.McCraryS. (2012). Engaging older adult volunteers in national service. Social Work Research, 36, 101-112.
65.
MisloveA.LehmannS.AhnY.-Y.OnnelaJ.-P.RosenquistN. J. (2011). Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 554-557).
66.
MitchellL.FrankM. R.HarrisK. D.DoddsP. S.DanforthC. M. (2013). The geography of happiness: Connecting Twitter sentiment and expression, demographics, and objective characteristics of place. PLoS ONE, 8, e64417.
67.
MohammadS. M. (2016). Sentiment analysis: Detecting valence, emotions, and other affectual states from text. Emotion Measurement, 201-237.
68.
MongeP. R.FulkJ.KalmanM. E.FlanaginA. J.ParnassaC.RumseyS. (1998). Production of collective action in alliance-based interorganizational communication and information systems. Organization Science, 9, 411-433.
69.
National and Community Service Trust Act. (NACSTA)1993 Pub. L. 103-82. 107 Stat 785
70.
NguyenQ. C.DapengL.Hsien-WenM.SurajK.ElaineN.FeifeiL.MingW. (2016). Building a national neighborhood dataset from geotagged Twitter data for indicators of happiness, diet, and physical activity. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 2(2).
71.
Nolen-HoeksemaS.RustingC. L. (2003). Gender differences in well being. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwartzN. (Eds.), Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation (pp. 330-352).
72.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being (The National Academies Collection: Reports Funded by National Institutes of Health). Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK189560/
73.
O’ConnorB.RamnathB.BryanR. R.NoahA. S. (2010). From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. Icwsm, 11(22-129), 1-2.
74.
OswaldA. J.WuS. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327, 576-579.
75.
ParkerB.SelskyJ. W. (2004). Interface dynamics in cause-based partnerships: An exploration of emergent culture. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 458-488.
76.
PaxtonP. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88-127.
77.
PennebakerJ. W.BoydR. L.JordanK.BlackburnK. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin: University of Texas at Austin. doi:10.15781/T29G6Z
78.
PennebakerJ. W.MarthaE. F.RogerJ. B. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 71.
79.
PerryJ. L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 181-197.
80.
PerryJ. L.ImperialM. T. (2001). A decade of service-related research: A map of the field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 462-479.
81.
PerryJ. L.KatulaM. C. (2001). Does service affect citizenship?Administration & Society, 33, 330-365.
82.
PerryJ. L.ThomsonA. M. (1997). Building communities through AmeriCorps. Bloomington: Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs.
83.
PerryJ. L.ThomsonA. M. (2004). Civic service: What difference does it make?New York, NY: Routledge.
84.
PerryJ. L.ThomsonA. M.TschirhartM.MeschD.LeeG. (1999). Inside a Swiss army knife: An assessment of AmeriCorps. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 225-250.
85.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
86.
QuerciaD.JonathanE.LiciaC.JonC.Tracking gross community happiness from tweets. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 965-968). ACM.
87.
SalamonL. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16(1-2), 29-49.
SchwartzH. A.UngarL. H. (2015). Data-driven content analysis of social media: A systematic overview of automated methods. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 78-94.
90.
SerowR. C.BitingP. F. (1995). National Service as Educational Reform: A Survey of Student Attitudes. Journal of Research and Development in Education28(2), 86-90.
91.
ShumerR. D.CadyJ. M. (1997). National service: Expectation versus reality (Service Learning, General. Paper 59). Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska-Omaha.
92.
SimonC. A.WangC. (2002). The impact of AmeriCorps service on volunteer participants: Results from a 2-year study in four western states. Administration & Society, 34, 522-540.
93.
SmithD. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 243-263.
94.
StefanidisA.CrooksA.RadzikowskiJ. (2013). Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds. Geojournal, 78, 319-338.
SubrahmanyamK.ReichS. M.WaechterN.EspinozaG. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420-433.
97.
SuttonJ. N.PalenL.ShklovskiI. (2008). Backchannels on the front lines: Emergency uses of social media in the 2007 Southern California wildfires. Denver, CO: University of Colorado.
98.
SuttonJ. NSpiroE. S.JohnsonB.FitzhughS.GibsonB.ButtsC. T. (2014). Warning Tweets: Serial transmission of messages during the warning phase of a disaster event. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 765-787.
99.
TausczikY. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24-54.
100.
ThomsonA. M.PerryJ. L. (1998). Can AmeriCorps build communities?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 399-420.
101.
TschirhartM. (1998). Understanding the older stipended volunteer: Age-related differences among AmeriCorps members. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22(1), 35-48.
102.
TumasjanA.SprengerT. O.SandnerP. G.WelpeI. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. ICWSM, 10(1), 178-185.
103.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.CarterN. T. (2014). Declines in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents, 1972-2012. Psychological Science, 25, 1914-1923.
104.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1997). National service programs: Role of state commissions in implementing the AmeriCorps program. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/HEHS-97-49
105.
Van TilJ.GallupG. H.Jr. (1997). AmeriCorps: Twenty questions and their answers from a national study. Paper presented at the Cantigny Conference Series, Wheaton, IL.
106.
VardaD. M. (2011). A network perspective on state-society synergy to increase community-level social capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 896-923.
WardK. D. (2014). Cultivating public service motivation through AmeriCorps service: A longitudinal study. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 114-125.
109.
WeiW.KennethJ.HuanL.KathleenM. C. (2015). The fragility of Twitter social networks against suspended users. In IEEE/ACM International conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (pp. 9-16).
110.
WeisbrodB. (1977). The voluntary nonprofit sector: An economic analysis. Lexington, KY: Health.
111.
WeissI.PaxtonP.VelascoK.ResslerR. W. (2018). Revisiting declines in social capital: Evidence from a new measure. Social Indicators Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11205-018-1956-6
WilsonJ. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215-240.
114.
WoffordH.WaldmanS. (1996). AmeriCorps the beautiful?Policy Review, 79, 28-36.
115.
WolpertJ. (1999). Communities, networks, and the future of philanthropy. In ClotfelterC. T.EhrlichT. (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 231-247). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
