The connection of theory to practice in public administration represents a critical transfer of information between scholarship and application. This important relationship establishes a basis of exchange among those engaged in the field, a bond that may be most magnified and accessible at the local levels of government. This study examines the perspectives of practitioners and scholars toward improving the theory–practice exchange in local government management through a series of focus group interviews held at the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) annual conference over 4 years. The findings suggest that the scholar and practitioner communities agree on several approaches and principles that may contribute to enhancing the theory–practice exchange within the themes of research transaction, collaboration, and professionalism. These themes offer mutual contexts for theory–practice interactions, which may help to inform institutional integration and best practice models, and facilitate a functional coexistence of interdependence and improved exchangeability in local government management.
AgranoffR. (2014). Local governments in multilevel systems: Emergent public administration challenges. American Review of Public Administration, 44, 47S-62S.
2.
AlterC.HageJ. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AmmonsD. N. (1994). The role of professional associations in establishing and promoting performance standards for local government. Public Productivity & Management Review, 17, 281-298.
4.
BabbieE. (2005). The basics of social research (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
5.
BergB. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
BowmanA. O’M.KearneyR. C. (1986). The resurgence of the states. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
BoxR. C. (1999). Running government like a business: Implications for public administration theory and practice. American Review of Public Administration, 29, 19-43.
8.
BreulJ. D.KamenskyJ. M. (2008). Federal government reform: Lessons from Clinton’s “reinventing government” and Bush’s “management agenda” initiatives. Public Administration Review, 68, 1009-1026.
9.
BuickF.BlackmanD.O’FlynnJ.O’DonnellM.WestD. (2016). Effective practitioner-scholar relationships: Lessons from a coproduction partnership. Public Administration Review, 76, 35-47.
10.
ChildsR. S. (1965). The first fifty years of the council-manager plan of municipal government. New York, NY: National Municipal League.
11.
DemirT.NyhanR. C. (2008). The politics-administration dichotomy: An empirical search for correspondence between theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 68, 81-96.
12.
DenhardtR. B. (2001). The big questions of public administration education. Public Administration Review, 61, 526-534.
13.
DonaldsonW. V. (1973). Continuing education for city managers. Public Administration Review, 33, 504-508.
14.
EdmundsH. (1999). The focus group research handbook. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill.
15.
FeiockR. C. (2009). Metropolitan governance and institutional collective action. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 356-377.
16.
FernE. F. (2001). Advanced focus group research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
FredericksonH. G.JohnsonG. A.WoodC. H. (2004). The adapted city: Institutional dynamics and structural change. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
18.
GoodenS. T.GrahamF. S.MartinK. J. (2014). Research partnerships at the state level: Bridging the academic-practitioner divide. State and Local Government Review, 46, 184-196.
19.
GraffyE. A. (2008). Meeting the challenges of policy-relevant science: Bridging theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 68, 1087-1100.
20.
GreenR. E. (1989). The profession of local government management: Management expertise and the American community. New York, NY: Praeger.
21.
HansellW. H. (2002). Professionalism in local government administration. In FredericksonH. G.NalbandianJ. (Eds.), The future of local government administration: The Hansell symposium (pp. 181-192). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
22.
HenryN. (1975). Paradigms of public administration. Public Administration Review, 35, 378-386.
KearneyR. C.FeldmanB. M.ScavoC. P. F. (2000). Reinventing government: City manager attitudes and actions. Public Administration Review, 60, 535-548.
26.
KitzingerJ.BarbourR. S. (1999). Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In BarbourR. S.KitzingerJ. (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 1-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
KlineR. L.BlanchardP. D. (1973). Professionalism and the city manager: An examination of unanswered questions. American Review of Public Administration, 7, 163-174.
28.
KnodelJ. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In MorganD. L. (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35-50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
KovenS. G.GoetzkeF.BrennanM. (2008). Profiling public affairs programs: The view from the top. Administration & Society, 40, 691-710.
30.
KrippendorfK. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
KruegerR. A. (1993). Quality control in focus group research. In MorganD. L. (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 65-85). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
LeeR. E.Hannah-SpurlockS. (2015). Bridging academic and practitioner interests on interlocal collaboration: Seasoned managers share their experiences in Florida. State and Local Government Review, 47, 127-133.
34.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
McDonaldB. D.III. (2010). The bureau of municipal research and the development of a professional public service. Administration & Society, 42, 815-835.
36.
MilamD. M. (2003). Practitioner in the classroom: Bringing local government experience into the public administration curriculum. Public Administration Review, 63, 364-369.
37.
MillerE. A. (2004). Advancing comparative state policy research: Toward conceptual integration and methodological expansion. State and Local Government Review, 36, 35-58.
38.
MillerH. T.KingC. S. (1998). Practical theory. American Review of Public Administration, 28, 43-60.
39.
MorganD. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
MouritzenP. E.SvaraJ. H. (2002). Leadership at the apex: Politicians and administrators in western local governments. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
41.
NalbandianJ. (1989). The contemporary role of city managers. American Review of Public Administration, 19, 261-278.
42.
NalbandianJ. (1991). Professionalism in local government: Transformations in the roles, responsibilities, and values of city managers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
NalbandianJ.O’NeillR.Jr.WilkesJ. M.KaufmanA. (2013). Contemporary challenges in local government: Evolving roles and responsibilities, structures, and processes. Public Administration Review, 73, 567-574.
44.
NelsonK. L.SvaraJ. H. (2015). The roles of local government managers in theory and practice: A centennial perspective. Public Administration Review, 75, 49-61.
NeumanW. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
47.
NewmanJ.CherneyA.HeadB. W. (2016). Do policy makers use academic research? Reexamining the “two communities” theory of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 76, 24-32.
48.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
49.
OvermanE. S.BoydK. J. (1994). Best practice research and postbureaucratic reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 67-83.
50.
PoisterT. H.IngrahamP. (1991). Assessing MPA program outcomes: Current practice and policy alternatives. American Review of Public Administration, 21, 169-181.
51.
RoederP. W.WhitakerG. (1993). Education for the public service: Policy analysis and administration in the MPA core curriculum. Administration & Society, 24, 512-540.
52.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
SlackJ. D. (1990). Local government training and education needs for the twenty-first century. Public Productivity & Management Review, 13, 397-404.
55.
SteneE. O. (1966). The city manager: Professional training and tenure. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
56.
StewartD. W.ShamdasaniP. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57.
StillmanR. J.II. (1974). The rise of the city manager: A public professional in local government. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
58.
StiversC. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
59.
StreibG. (2005). Quantifying the knowledge of public management professionals: Developing an assessment tool for local government managers. Public Performance & Management Review, 28, 418-436.
60.
SvaraJ. H. (1985). Dichotomy and duality: Reconceptualizing the relationship between policy and administration in council-manager cities. Public Administration Review, 45, 221-232.
61.
SvaraJ. H. (2010). The next generation challenge: Incorporating the local government managers of the future. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16, 361-377.
62.
ThaiK. V. (1985). Does NASPAA peer review improve the quality of PA/A education?Public Administration Quarterly, 8, 442-460.
63.
ThomsonD. E. (2010). The evolving role of universities in expanding knowledge among local elected officials. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16, 421-450.
64.
WangJ.BunchB. S.StreamC. (2013). Increasing the usefulness of academic scholarship for local government practitioners. State and Local Government Review, 45, 197-213.
65.
WeissertC. S.SchellerD. (2008). Learning from the states? Federalism and national health policy. Public Administration Review, 68(Suppl. 1), S162-S174.
66.
WelchE.WongW. (1998). Public administration in a global context: Bridging the gaps of theory and practice in western and non-western nations. Public Administration Review, 58, 40-49.
67.
WhiteL. D. (1927). The city manager. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68.
WilsonW. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
69.
WrightB. E. (2015). The science of public administration: Problems, presumptions, progress, and possibilities. Public Administration Review, 75, 795-805.
