This study examines gender dimensions of managerial values at the local level of government. We test for alternative explanations, in particular whether the organization and profession are socializing forces with similar or larger influence on managerial values. The data for this study come from Phase IV of the National Administrative Studies Project (NASP IV). The dataset includes the U.S. senior local government managers in communities with populations over 50,000. We expect the values of men and women managers to differ even when we account for professional and organizational forces. Preliminary findings support this hypothesis. Women not only differed from men on the values of equity, long-term outlook, sense of community, and representation, but also differed with respect to the values of efficiency, effectiveness, and expertise. We discuss these findings and their implications.
AstinH. S.LelandC. (1999). Women of influence, women of vision: A cross-generational study of leaders and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
BeckS. A. (1991). Rethinking municipal governance: Gender distinctions on local councils. In DodsonD. L. (Ed.), Gender and policymaking: Studies of women in office (pp. 103-113). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.
3.
BurkeS.CollinsK. (2001). Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills. Women in Management Review, 16, 244-257.
4.
BurnsR. A. (1979). Women in municipal management: Choice, challenge, and change. New Brunswick, NJ: Center of the American Women in Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
5.
CannA.SiegfriedW. D. (1990). Gender stereotypes and dimensions of effective leadership behavior. Sex Roles, 23, 413-419.
6.
CarliL. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 726-741.
7.
CarnesK. C.KeithleyJ. P. (1993). Does the limited tenure of internal auditors hamper fraud detection?Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 12(3), 3-29.
8.
DawsonL. M. (1997). Ethical differences between men and women in the sales profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1143-1152.
9.
DeHart-DavisL.MarloweJ.PandeyS. K. (2006). Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 66, 873-887.
10.
DenhardtR. B. (1968). Bureaucratic socialization and organizational accommodation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, 441-450.
11.
DodsonD. L.CarrollS. J. (1991). Reshaping the agenda: Women in state legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.
12.
DownsA. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
13.
Duerst-LahtiG.KellyR. M. (Eds.). (1995). Gender power, leadership, and governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 781-797.
15.
EaglyA. H.JohnsonB. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
16.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J.JohnsonB. T. (1992). Gender and leadership style among school principals: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28, 76-102.
17.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.DiekmanA. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In EckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
EdwardsT. J.NalbandianJ.WedelK. R. (1981). Individual values and professional education: Implications for practice and education. Administration & Society, 13, 123-143.
19.
FergusonK. E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
20.
FoxR. L.SchuhmannR. A. (1999). Gender and local government: A comparison of women and men city managers. Public Administration Review, 59, 231-242.
21.
GallowayT. D.EdwardsT. J. (1982). Critically examining the assumptions of espoused theory the case of city planning and management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48, 184-195.
22.
GawthropL. C. (1969). Bureaucratic behavior in the executive branch: An analysis of organization change. New York, NY: Free Press.
23.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
GuyM. (2003). The difference that gender makes. In HaysS. W.KearneyR. C. (Eds.), Public personnel administration: Problems and prospects (pp. 265-269). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
GuyM. E. (Ed.). (1992). Women and men of the states: Public administrators at the state level. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
26.
GuyM. E.NewmanM. A. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64, 289-298.
27.
GuyM. E.NewmanM. A.MastracciS. H. (2008). Emotional labor: Putting the service in public service. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
28.
HeilmanM. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
29.
HullG. T.ScottP. B.SmithB. (Eds.). (1982). All the women are White, all the Blacks are men, but some of us brave: Black women’s studies. New York: The Feminist Press at The City University of New York.
30.
JacobsonW. S.PalusC. K.BowlingC. J. (2010). A woman’s touch? Gendered management and performance in state administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 477-504.
31.
JorgensenT. B.BozemanB. (2007). Public values and inventory. Administration & Society, 39, 354-381.
32.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
33.
KaufmanH. (1960). The forest ranger: A study in administrative behavior. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
34.
KeiserL. R.WilkinsV. M.MeierK. J.HollandC. A. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96, 553-564.
35.
KellyR. M.GuyM. E.BayesJ.Duerst-LahtiG.DukeL. L.HaleM. M.StanleyJ. R. (1991). Public managers in the states: A comparison of career advancement by sex. Public Administration Review, 51, 402-412.
36.
KezarA. (2000). Pluralistic leadership: Incorporating diverse voices. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 722-743.
37.
LittleT. H.DunnD.DeenR. E. (2001). A view from the top. Women & Politics, 22(4), 29-50.
38.
MastracciS. H.GuyM. E.NewmanM. A. (2012). Emotional labor and crisis response: Working on the Razor’s edge. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
39.
MeglinoB. M.RavlinE. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351-389.
40.
MeierK. J. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: A theoretical and empirical exposition. In PerryJ. (Ed.), Research in public administration (pp. 1-35). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
41.
MeierK. J.Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2006). Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66, 850-860.
42.
MeierK. J.NigroL. G. (1976). Representative bureaucracy and policy preferences: A study in the attitudes of federal executives. Public Administration Review, 36, 458-469.
43.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.GoerdelH. T. (2006). Management activity and program performance: Gender as management capital. Public Administration Review, 66, 24-36.
44.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J.SmithC. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a 3-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
45.
MorrisJ. (1998). Good education management: Women’s experiences. In DrakeP.OwenP. (Eds.), Gender and management issues in education: An International Perspective (pp. 97-111). Staffordshire, England: Trentham Books.
46.
MosherF. C. (1968). Democracy and the public service. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
MosherF. C.StillmanR. (1977). The profession in government: Introduction. Public Administration Review, 37, 631-633.
48.
NalbandianJ.TerryE. J. (1983). The values of public administrators: A comparison with lawyers, social workers, and business administrators. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 4, 114-127.
49.
NewmanM. A. (1994). Gender and Lowi’s thesis: Implications for career advancement. Public Administration Review, 54, 277-284.
50.
PandeyS. K.StazykE. C. (2008). Antecedents and correlates of public service motivation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 101-117). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
PerryJ. L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 181-197.
52.
PortilloS.DeHart-DavisL. (2009). Gender and organizational rule abidance. Public Administration Review, 69, 339-347.
53.
PowellG. N.GravesL. M. (2003). Women and men in management (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
RiccucciN. M.MeyersM. K. (2004). Linking passive and active representation: The case of front-line workers in welfare agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 585-597.
55.
RidgewayC. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637-655.
56.
RinehartS. T. (1991). Do women leaders make a difference? Substance, style, and perception. In DodsonD. L. (Ed.), Gender and policymaking: Studies of women in office (pp. 93-102). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.
57.
RohrJ. (1978). Ethics for Bureaucrats. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
58.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
59.
RokeachM.Ball-RokeachS. J. (1989). Stability and change in American values, 1969-1981. American Psychologist, 44, 775-784.
60.
RomzekB. S. (1990). Employee investment and commitment: The ties that bind. Public Administration Review, 50, 374-382.
61.
RosenbloomD. H.KravchukR. S.ClerkinR. M. (2008). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
62.
RosenerJ. B. (1990, November/December). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-125.
63.
RosenthalC. S. (2001). Gender styles in state legislative committees. Women & Politics, 21(2), 21-45.
64.
RosserV. J. (2003). Faculty and staff members’ perceptions of effective leadership: Are there differences between women and men leaders?Equity & Excellence in Education, 36, 71-81.
65.
SaidelJ.LoscoccoK. (2005). Agency leaders, gendered institutions, and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 65, 158-171.
66.
Saint-GermainM. A. (1989). Does their difference make a difference?Social Science Quarterly, 70, 956-968.
67.
SimonH. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
68.
StiversC. (1995). Settlement women and bureau men: Constructing a usable past for public administration. Public Administration Review, 55, 522-529.
69.
StiversC. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
70.
StiversC. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
SwersM. L. (2002). The difference women make: The policy impact of women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72.
ThompsonF. J. (1976). Minority groups in public bureaucracies: Are passive and active representation linked?Administration & Society, 8, 201-226.
73.
TowerL. E.AlkadryM. G. (2008). The social costs of career success for women. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 144-165.
74.
Watkins-HayesC. (2011). Race, respect, and red tape: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 2), i233-i251.
75.
WeberM. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. (GerthH. H.MillsC. W., Ed., Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
76.
WilkinsV. M. (2007). Exploring the causal story: Gender, active representation, and bureaucratic priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 77-94.
77.
WilkinsV. M.WilliamsB. N. (2008). Black or blue: Racial profiling and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 68, 654-664.
78.
YangK.PandeyS. K. (2009). How do perceived political environment and administrative reform affect employee commitment?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 335-360.
