Recognizing and Responding to Retirement Obligations

Abstract

With the implementation of recent accounting standards (GASB 43 and 45), local governments began reporting their liabilities and funding levels for postemployment benefits other than pensions—so-called OPEBs. In this article we pose three questions: (a) What factors affect the size of a government’s OPEB liability? (b) How did the OPEB standards affect the way governments manage their OPEB plans? and (c) What factors explain government responds to the OPEB standards? We draw data directly from audited financial reports in Florida counties and cities to examine those questions. Our results suggest that benefit policies, personnel characteristics, and actuarial cost methods are the most influential factors in determining a size of a government’s OPEB liability. Our results also provide evidence that many governments responded to the OPEB standards by reducing their benefits and changing their funding approaches. We show preliminary evidence of differences in governments that changed their policies or funding approaches with those that continued the status quo.

Keywords

administrative reform financial transparency retirement benefits accounting standards financial management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akresh

Sher

(1999). Year-end strategies for pension & OPEB obligations and expense. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 10(2), 105-118.

Biggs

A. G.

(2011). An options pricing method for calculating the market price of public sector pension liabilities. Public Budgeting & Finance, 31(3), 94-118.

Carpenter

V. L.

Feroz

(2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four U.S. state governments’ decision to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 26, 565-596.

Center for State and Local Government Excellence. (2011, January). State and local pensions: An overview of funding issues and challenges. Washington, DC: Author.

Chase

B. W.

Calkins-McGettigan

(2008). Survey: Approaches vary among Virginia governments. Journal of Accountancy, 206(2), 60.

Chung

Jacob

Neuwirth

(1993, June 1). Changes in actuarial assumptions/plan designs after FASB 106. CPA Journal, 63, 56.

Clark

(1994). Municipal fiscal strain: Indicators and causes. Government Finance Review, 10, 27-29.

CNN Opinion Research Poll (2011, March 11-13). Retrieved from http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/images/03/31/rel4m.pdf

Coe

C. K.

Rivenbark

W. C.

(2010). Implementing GASB 45: Recommended best practices in local government. Public Budgeting & Finance 30(4), 71-81.

10.

Coggburn

Kearney

(2010). Trouble keeping promises? An analysis of underfunding in state retiree benefits. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 97-108.

11.

Cohen

(2011, February 22). Played for pension fools. The Washington Post, p. A13.

12.

Christie

(2011, March 17). California voters souring on public pensions: Survey. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/17/us-economy-california-pensions-survey-idUSTRE72G3KF20110317

13.

Finkler

(2009). Financial management for public, health, and not-for-profit organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

14.

Fogarty

Grant

(1995). Impact of the actuarial profession on financial reporting. Accounting Horizons, 9, 23-33.

15.

Frederickson

H. G.

(1994). Can public officials correctly be said to have obligations to future generations? Public Administration Review, 54, 457-464

16.

Frederickson

H. G.

Johnson

G. A.

Wood

C. H.

(2004). The adapted city: Institutional dynamics and structural change. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

17.

Friedrich

C. J.

(1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In Friedrich

C. J.

Mason

E. S.

(Eds.), Public policy: A yearbook of the graduate school of public administration (pp. 3-24). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

18.

General Accountability Office. (2009, November). Report to chairman, special committee on aging, U.S. Senate: State and local government retiree health benefits. Washington, DC: Author.

19.

Goodnow

(1900). Politics and administration (Technical Bulletin 2004-2). New York, NY: MacMillan. Governmental Accounting Standards Board.

20.

Government Accounting Standards Board. (2008, March). Research brief: State and local government use of generally accepted accounting principles for general purpose external financial reporting. Norwalk, CT: Author.

21.

Hann

Subramanyan

(2007). Uniformity versus flexibility: Evidence from pricing of the pension obligation. Accounting Review, 82(1), 107-137.

22.

Hendrick

R. M.

(2011) Managing the fiscal metropolis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

23.

Herbert

Williams

Burge

Baliga

(1989). Responses to OPEB proposal. Journal of Accountancy, 168(5), 19-20.

24.

Hiltzik

(2011, May 15). Some truths about public pensions. Los Angeles Times, p. B1.

25.

Jensen

(2011, January 7). San Diego ahead in pension reform—City considers 401(k)-style system. The Bond Buyer, p. 9.

26.

Justice

J. B.

Scorsone

E. A.

(2012). Measuring and predicting local government fiscal stress. In Levine

Justice

J. B.

Scorsone

E. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of local government fiscal health (pp., 43-74) Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

27.

The Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust. (2003, September). Employer health beneﬁts: 2003 Annual Survey. Menlo Park, CA: Author.

28.

Keating

Berman

(2007). Unfunded public employee health care benefits and GASB No. 45. Accounting Horizons, 21, 245-263.

29.

Lewis-Beck

M. S.

(1980). Applied regression: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

30.

Lowenstein

(2010, June 27). The next crisis: Public pension funds. The New York Times, Magazine Section, p. MM9.

31.

March

J. G.

(1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York, NY: Free Press.

32.

Marlow

M. L.

Orzechowski

(1996). Public sector unions and public sector spending. Public Choice, 89, 1-16.

33.

Marlowe

(2007). Much ado about nothing? The size and credit quality implications of municipal and other postemployment benefit liabilities. Journal of Budgeting & Finance, 27, 104-131.

34.

Marlowe

(2011). Beyond 5 percent: Optimal municipal slack resources and credit ratings. Public Budgeting and Finance, 31(4), 93-108.

35.

Miner

(1994). Ask a benefit actuary: New approach is needed to compute plan liability. Business Insurance, 28, 27.

36.

Novy-Marx

Rauh

J. D.

(2011). Public pension promises: How big are they and what are they worth? Journal of Finance, 66, 1211-1249.

37.

Patton

T. R.

Bauer

(2008, January/February 28-31). The GASB OPEB Standards: To comply or not to comply. Today’s CPA, 35(4), 28-31.

38.

Pearson

Jerris

Brooks

(1995). Accounting for OPEBs: Does better accounting serve the public interest? Journal of Applied Business Research, 11, 1-6.

39.

Peng

(2009). State and local pension fund management. Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach.

40.

Pew Center on the States. (2010, February). The trillion dollar gap: Underfunded state retirement systems and the roads to reform. Philadelphia, PA: Author.

41.

Pfeffer

Salancik

G. R.

(1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row

42.

Pickens

(2009). Managing the Challenges of OPEB. Government Finance Review, 25(6), 42-46.

43.

Riordan

Rubalcava

(2010, September 16). How Pensions Can Get Out of the Red. The New York Times, p. A33.

44.

Rizzo

(2009). Future cost versus market value: The great debate over pension valuation. Government Finance Review, 25(4), 32-38.

45.

Selznick

(1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.

46.

Simon

H. A.

(1945) Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York, NY: MacMillan.

47.

Sneed

S. S.

Sneed

J. E.

(1997). The intergenerational consequence of retiree healthcare premiums: What is the evidence. Journal of Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 9, 285.

48.

Sohl

Peddle

M. T.

Thurmaier

Wood

C. H.

Kuhn

(2009), Measuring the financial position of municipalities: Numbers do not speak for themselves. Public Budgeting and Finance, 29(3), 74-96.

49.

Wagner

R. E.

(1976) Revenue structure, fiscal illusion, and budgetary choice. Public Choice, 25(1), 45-61.

50.

Walsh

M. W.

(2011, March 11). The burden of pensions on states. The New York Times, p. B1.

51.

Wang

Dennis

Y. S.

(2007) Measuring fiscal condition: A study of U.S. states. Public Budgeting and Finance, 27(2), 1-21.

52.

Whoriskey

(2011, March 4). The big pension math question. The Washington Post, p. A14.

53.

Wisniewski

S. C.

(2005). Potential state government practices impact of the new GASB accounting standard for retiree health benefits. Public Budgeting & Finance, 25, 104-118.

54.

Weick

K.E.

(1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.