Recent research has explored differences in the experiences of women and men public officials. Overlooked in these examinations is the position of city manager—a significant position in terms of local administration and policy development. Current figures indicate that women are underrepresented in the field of city management when compared with their peers in the private sector and federal and state administration—women hold only 11% of city manager positions. In trying to explain women’s apparent underrepresentation, the authors explore the importance of mentoring in the public sector using data gathered from a nationwide study of women and men city managers. Their data suggest that mentoring in the city management profession is characterized by factors that appear to work against women. These factors, which include a vacuum of professional mentoring opportunities, may help explain the slow inclusion of women into the field of city management.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Burke, R. J.
(1984). Mentors in organizations. Group and organizational studies, 9(3), 353-372.
2.
Burrell, B.
(1994). A woman’s place is in the house. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3.
Chandler, C.
(1996). Mentoring and women in academia: Reevaluating the traditional model. NWSA Journal, 8(3), 79-91.
4.
Davidson, M. J.
, & Cooper, C. L. (1992). Shattering the glass ceiling: The woman manager. Oxford, UK: Martin Robertson.
5.
Dreher, G. F.
, & Ash, R. A. (1990). A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional, and technical positions. Journal of Applied Technology, 75(5), 539-546.
6.
Dreher, G. F.
, & Cox, T. H., Jr. (1996). Race, gender, and opportunity: A study of compensation attainment and the establishment of mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 297-309.
7.
Duerst-Lahti, G.
, & Kelly, R. M. (1995). Gender power, leadership, and governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
Federal Glass Ceiling Commission
. (1995). A solid investment: Making full use of the nation’s human capital. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
9.
Ferguson, K. E.
(1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
10.
Fitt, L. W.
, & Newton, D. A. (1981). When the mentor is a man and the protégé is a woman.Harvard Business Review, 59, 56-60.
11.
Fox, R. L.
(1997). Gender dynamics in congressional elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Fox, R. L.
, & Schuhmann, R. A. (1999). Gender and local government: A comparison of women and men city managers. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 231-242.
13.
Grandjean, B. D.
(1981). History and career in a bureaucratic labor market. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1057-1092.
14.
Guy, M. E.
(1992). The context of public management in the States. In M. E. Guy & M. E. Sharpe (Eds.), Women and men of the States: Public administrators at the state level. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
15.
Guy, M. E.
(1995). Women, public administration, and the personnel function. In S. W. Hays & R. C Kearney (Eds.), Public personnel administration (pp. 232-246). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
Hale, M. M.
(1992). Mentoring. In M. E. Guy & M. E. Sharpe (Eds.), Women and men of the States: Public administrators at the state level. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
17.
Hale, M. M.
(1995). Mentoring women in organizations: Practice in search of theory. The American Review of Public Administration, 25(4), 327-339.
18.
Hale, M. M.
, & Kelly, R. M. (Eds.). (1989). Gender, bureaucracy, and democracy. New York: Greenwood.
19.
Hearn, J.
, & Parkin, W. (1987). “Sex” at “work”: The power and paradox of organization sexuality. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf.
20.
Henderson, D. W.
(1985). Enlightened mentoring: A characteristic of public management professionalism. Public Administration Review, 45(6), 857-863.
21.
International City Management Association. (2000). Available: http://www.icma.org.
22.
Kelly, R. M.
, Guy, M. E., Bayes, J., Duerst-Lahti, G., Duke, L. L., Hale, M. M., Johnson, C., Kawar, A., & Stanley, J. R. (1991). Public managers in the States: A comparison of career advancement by sex. Public Administration Review, 51(15), 408.
23.
Lewis, G. B.
(1986). Equal employment opportunity and the early career in federal employment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 6(3), 1-18.
24.
Markham, W. T.
, Macken, P. O., Bonjean, C. M., & Corder, J. (1983). A note on sex, geographic mobility, and career advancement. Social Forces, 61(4), 1138-1146.
25.
Martin, J. M.
(1997). Women who govern: The president’s appointments. In M. E. Borrelli & J. M. Martin (Eds.), The other elites (pp. 51-72). Boulder, CO: Rienner.
26.
Naff, K. C.
(1994). Through the glass ceiling: Prospects for the advancement of women in the federal civil service. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 507-514.
27.
Naff, K. C.
(1995). Subjective vs. objective discrimination in government: Adding to the picture of barriers to the advancement of women. Political Research Quarterly, 48, 535-558.
28.
Nicolson, P.
(1996). Gender, power, and organization. New York: Routledge.
29.
Ragins, B. R.
(1989). Barriers to mentoring: The female manager’s dilemma. Human Relations, 42(1), 1-22.
30.
Reich, M. H.
(1985). Executive views from both sides of mentoring. Personnel, 62(3), 42-46.
31.
Reich, M. H.
(1986). The mentor connection. Personnel, 63(2), 50-56.
32.
Richey, C. A.
, Gambrill, E. D., & Blythe, B. J. (1988). Mentor relationships among women in academe. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 3(1), 34-47.
33.
Schuhmann, R. A.
, & Fox, R. L. (1998). Women chief administrative officers: Perceptions of their role in government. In The Municipal Yearbook 1998 (pp. 16-22). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
34.
Szymborski, L.
(1996). Why are there so few women managers?. Public Management, 78(12), 11-15.
35.
Stivers, C.
(1993). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Vertz, L. L.
(1985). Women, occupational advancement, and mentoring: An analysis of one public organization. Public Administration Review, 45(3), 415-424.
37.
White, B.
, Cox, C., & Cooper, C. (1992). Women’s career development: A study of high flyers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
