This article examines local responses to the Year 2000 (Y2K) problem in Iowa to analyze how local governments plan for information technology (IT) operations. Many local governments lacked concrete plans and failed to think strategically about the Y2K problem at the beginning of 1999. A logistic analysis shows that the decision to form a concrete Y2K strategy depended on management attitudes and the technological sensitivity of local decision makers rather than on resource constraints or system characteristics. However, insufficient resources, not management attitudes and system characteristics, were the key determinant of the eventual outcomes of planning. This study concludes that local governments should think more strategically in IT planning and that senior management should take a more active role in the planning process. Local governments, especially counties, may need state assistance to improve IT planning for the information revolution in the new millennium.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, D. F.
, & Dawes, S. S. (1991). Government information management: A primer and casebook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Andersen, D. F.
, Belardo, S., & Dawes, S. S. (1994). Strategic information management: Conceptual frameworks for the public sector. Public Productivity and Management Review, 17(4), 335-353.
3.
Barrett, K.
, & Greene, R. (1999, February). Grading the states: A management report card. Governing, 17-90.
4.
Beath, C.
(1991). Supporting the information technology champion. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 355-372.
5.
Bellamy, C.
, Raab, C., Dutton, W. H., & Peltu, M. (1996). Innovation in public service delivery. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), Information and communication technologies: Visions and realities (pp. 265-282). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Bozeman, B.
, & Bretschneider, S. (1986). Public management information systems: Theory and prescription. Public Administration Review, 46, 475-487.
7.
Bretschneider, S.
(1990). Management information systems in public and private organizations: An empirical test. Public Administration Review, 56(5), 536-545.
8.
Bretschneider, S.
, & Wittmer, D. (1993). Organizational adoption of microcomputer technology: The role of sector. Information Systems Research, 4(1), 88-108.
9.
Caudle, S. L.
(1994). Managing information and technology for results. The Public Manager, 23(1), 48-50.
10.
Caudle, S. L
, Gorr, W. L., & Newcomer, K. E. (1991). Key information systems management issues for the public sector. MIS Quarterly, 15(2), 171-188.
11.
Collins, F.
(1994). Cost-benefit analysis for information technology projects. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
12.
Dawes, S. S.
(1996). Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(3), 377-394.
13.
De Looff, L. A.
(1998). Information systems outsourcing: Theories, case evidence and a decision framework. In L. P. Willcocks & M. C. Lacity (Eds.), Strategic sourcing of information systems (pp. 249-281). New York: Wiley.
14.
Dye, T. R.
(1997). Metropolitics: Conflict in the metropolis. In T. R. Dye (Ed.), Politics in states and communities (9th ed., pp. 348-374). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Ein-Dor, P.
, & Segev, E. (1978). Strategic planning for management information systems. Management Science, 24(15), 1631-1641.
16.
Fletcher, P. T.
, Bretschneider, S. I., Marchand, D. A., Rosenbaum, H., & Bertot, J. C. (1992). Managing information technology: Transforming county governments in the 1990s. Syracuse, NY: School of Information Studies, Syracuse University.
17.
Fletcher, P. D.
, & Foy, D. O. (1994). Managing information systems in state and local government. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 29, 243-275.
18.
Flynn, J. T.
(1998). Local government year 2000 compliance survey. Sacramento: State of California, Department of Information Technology.
19.
Greene, W. H.
(1993). Econometric analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
20.
Henderson, J. C.
, & Sifonis, J. G. (1988). The value of strategic IS planning: Understanding consistency, validity, and IS markets. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 187-200.
21.
Huffman, L. A.
(1998). The year 2000 problem: What local governments are doing [Special Data Issue No. 6]. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
22.
Jarvenpaa, S.
, & Ives, B. (1991). Executive involvement and participation in the management of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 15(2), 205-228.
23.
Keen, J.
(1994). Should the National Health Service have an information strategy?Public Administration, 72, 33-53.
24.
Keen, P.G.W.
(1988). Relationship of senior management and the IS organization. In J. J. Elam, M. J. Ginzberg, P.G.W. Keen, & R. W. Zmud (Eds.), Transforming the IS organization (pp. 41-54). Washington, DC: International Center for Information Technologies.
25.
Kelman, S.
(1994). Taxpayer service at the IRS. In J. Fountain, L. Kaboolian, S. Kelman, & J. Mechling (Eds.), Customer service excellence: Using information technologies to improve service delivery in government. Cambridge, MA: Strategic Computing and Telecommunications Program, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
26.
Kraemer, K. L.
, & Dedrick, J. (1997). Computing and public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 89-112.
27.
Kraemer, K. L.
, & King, J. L. (1986). Computing and public organizations. Public Administration Review, 46, 488-496.
28.
Kraemer, K. L.
, King, J. L., Dunkle, D. E., & Lane, J. P. (1989). Managing information systems: Change and control in organizational computing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Lederer, A. L.
, & Sethi, V. (1992). Root causes of strategic information systems planning implementation problems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 25-45.
30.
Lowery, D.
, & Berry, W. D. (1983). The growth of government in the United States: An empirical assessment of competing explanations. American Journal of Political Science, 27(4), 665-694.
31.
McCann, Michelle
. (1998, February). New York works to steer its agencies clear of date code failures. Government Computing News—State & Local, 4(6), 32.
32.
Mechling, J.
(1991). Computers in local finance. In J. E. Petersen & D. R. Strachota (Eds.), Local government finance: Concepts and practices (pp. 417-433). Chicago: Government Financial Officers Association.
33.
Mechling, J.
, & Fletcher, T. M. (1996). The need for new leadership. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
34.
Mechling, J.
, & Sweeney, V. (1997). Overcoming budget barriers: Funding information technology projects in the public sector. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
35.
Mechling, J.
, & Sweeney, V. (1998). Finding and funding IT initiatives in the public sector. Sacramento, CA: Government Technology Press.
36.
National Association of Counties
. (1998). NACo’s Y2K survey of America’s counties. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
Neef, D.
(Ed.). (1998). The knowledge economy. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
38.
New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, Division of Local Government Services
. (1999). The year 2000 and local governments [Online]. Trenton: Author. Available: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/lgspages/y2k/y2kpg1.htm
39.
New York State Office for Technology
. (n.d.) Local government workgroup & resources [Online]. Albany: Author. Available: http://www.irm.state.ny.us/yr2000/localgov.htm
40.
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
. (1995). Evaluating information technology investments. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41.
Pindyck, R. S.
, & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998). Econometric models and economic forecasts (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
Rubin, B. M.
(1986). Information systems for public management: Design and implementation. Public Administration Review, 46, 540-552.
43.
Sacco, J. F.
, & Ostrowski, J. W. (1991). Microcomputers and government management: Design and use of applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
44.
Sartore, A. B.
, & Kraemer, K. (1977). Research on impacts of computers on local government personnel and organization. In K. L. Kraemer & J. L. King (Eds.), Computers and local government (pp. 129-190). New York: Praeger.
45.
SAS Institute
. (1990). SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, volume 2 (4th ed.). Cary, NC: Author.
46.
Sparrow, M. K.
(1996). Illinois Department of Revenue: A case study report. Cambridge, MA: Strategic Computing and Telecommunications Program, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
47.
State CIOs share strategies to overcome date code problems
. (1998, June). Government Computing News—State & Local, 4(6), 1.
48.
State of California, Department of Information Technology
. (1998). First survey of California city, county Y2K readiness released [Online]. Sacramento: Author. Available: http://www.Year2000.ca.gov/documents/county_readiness_survey.asp
49.
State of Texas, Department of Information Resources
. (1998). Texas guidebook 2000: About time: Managing the Y2K problem in local government [Online]. Austin: Author. Available: http://www.dir.state.tx.us/y2k/resources/guidebook2000.html
50.
Stevens, J. M.
, & LaPlante, J. M. (1986). Factors associated with financial-decision support systems in state government: An empirical exploration. Public Administration Review, 46, 522-531.
51.
Stevens, J. M.
, & McGowan, R. P. (1985). Information systems and public management. New York: Praeger.
52.
Swain, J. W.
, White, J. D., & Hubbert, E. D. (1995). Issues in public management information systems. The American Review of Public Administration, 25(3), 279-296.
53.
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Information Management
. (1995). Information management strategic plan: Information: The fuel for success. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
54.
U.S. Government Accounting Office
. (1992). Strategic information planning: Framework for designing and developing system architectures. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
55.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, Subcommittee on Government Management, Information, and Technology
. (1996). Is January 1, 2000 the date for a potential computer disaster?Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
56.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Science, Subcommittee on Technology
, and Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, Subcommittee on Government Management, Information, and Technology. (1996). Solving the year 2000 computer problem. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
57.
Walters, J.
(1996, August). Cry, the beleaguered county. Governing, 31-37.
58.
Wexelblat, R. L.
, & Srinivasan, N. (1999). Planning for information technology in a federal organization. Information and Management, 35, 265-282.
59.
Willcocks, L.
(1994). Managing information systems in UK public administration: Issues and prospects. Public Administration, 72, 13-32.
60.
Wonnacott, T. H.
, & Wonnacott, R. J. (1990). Introductory statistics for business and economics (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
61.
Yu, P. J.
, & Bretschneider, S. (1998). Executive perceptions of innovativeness in information management. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 3, 179-213.
