There has been considerable debate within the literature over the degree to which environmental conflict in the Western United States stems from tensions between urban and rural areas. A number of scholars have suggested that such conflict exists throughout the West; others have argued either that this urban-rural conflict does not exist or that conflict over environmental preferences stems from factors other than place of residence. This study uses voting on statewide environmental ballot measures, with counties as the unit of analysis, to investigate whether voters in urban and rural areas express different levels of support for environmental protection. When such differences are found, the study offers explanations. Findings suggest that urban counties do vote in support of environmental protection at significantly higher levels than rural counties but that demographic variables and economic conditions are more influential in determining those levels of support than is the urban or rural nature of the county.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alm, L. R.
, & Witt, S. L. (1996, Fall). The rural-urban environmental conflict in the American West: A four state study. Spectrum, pp. 26-35.
2.
Alm, L. R.
, & Witt, S. L. (1997). The rural-urban linkage to environmental policy making in the American West: A focus on Idaho. Social Science Journal, 34(3), 271-284.
3.
Bartlett, R. V.
(1993). Political culture and the environmental problematique in the American West. In Z. A. Smith (Ed.), Environmental politics and policy in the West. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hall.
4.
Bennett, K.
, & McBeth, M. K. (1998). Contemporary Western rural USA economic composition: Potential implications for environmental policy and research. Environmental Management, 22(3), 371-381.
5.
Buttel, F. H.
(1975). The environmental movement: Consensus, conflict, and change. Journal of Environmental Education, 7, 53-63.
6.
Buttel, F. H.
(1979). Age and environmental concern: A multivariate analysis. Youth & Society, 10, 237-256.
7.
California Office of Economic Research
. (1998). California: An economic profile. Sacramento: California Trade and Commerce Agency.
8.
Colorado Office of Economic Development
. (1999). Colorado data book. Denver: Colorado Department of Commerce.
9.
Dunlap, R. E.
(1991). Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965-1990. Society and Natural Resources, 4, 285-312.
10.
Dunlap, R. E.
(1993). Public opinion: Does public concern for the environment differ in the West? In Z. A. Smith (Ed.), Environmental politics and policy in the West. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hall.
11.
Elliot, E.
, Regens, J. L., & Seldon, B. J. (1995). Exploring variation in public support for environmental protection. Social Science Quarterly, 76(1), 41-52.
12.
Feldman, D. L.
(1993). Natural resource policy in the West: The absence of an environmental ethic. In Z. A. Smith (Ed.), Environmental politics and policy in the West. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hall.
13.
Fortmann, L.
, & Kusel, J. (1990). New voices, old beliefs: Forest environmentalism among new and long-standing rural residents. Rural Sociology, 55(2), 214-232.
14.
Freshwater, D.
, & Deavers, K. (1992). Falling farther behind: Current conditions in rural America. In R. D. Bollman (Ed.), Rural and small town Canada. Toronto, Canada: Thompson Educational.
15.
Freudenburg, W. R.
(1991). Rural-urban differences in environmental concern: A closer look. Sociological Inquiry, 61(2), 167-195.
16.
Gaguin, D. A.
, & Littman, M. S. (Eds.). (1998). County and city extra: Annual metropolitan, city, and county data book. Lenham: Berman.
17.
Hays, S. P.
(1991). The new environmental West. Journal of Policy History, 3(3).
18.
Jones, R. E.
, & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?Rural Sociology, 57(1), 28-47.
19.
Kahn, M. E.
, & Matsusaka, J. G. (1997, April). Demand for environmental goods: Evidence from voting patterns on California initiatives. Journal of Law and Economics, 40, 137-173.
20.
Lowe, G. D.
, & Pinhey, T. K. (1982). Rural-urban differences in support for environmental protection. Rural Sociology, 47(1), 114-128.
21.
McBeth, M. K.
(1992, Summer). Rural development and environmental preservation: A search for community consensus. Economic Development Review.
22.
McBeth, M. K.
(1995). Environmental and economic development attitudes: An empirical analysis. Economic Development Quarterly, 9(1), 39-49.
23.
McBeth, M. K.
, & Bennett, K. (1998). Local elected officials and environmental policy: Does rural matter anymore?Social Science Journal, 35(4), 577-588.
24.
McBeth, M. K.
, & Foster, R. H. (1994). Rural environmental attitudes. Environmental Management, 18(3), 401-412.
25.
Morrison, D. E.
(1986). How and why environmental consciousness has trickled down. In A. Schnaiberg, N. Watts, & K. Zimmermann (Eds.), Distributional conflict in environmental-resource policy. New York: St. Martin’s.
26.
Oregon Secretary of State
. (1999). Oregon blue book: 1999-2000. Salem: Office of the Oregon Secretary of State.
27.
Power, T. M.
(1988). The economic pursuit of quality. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
28.
Power, T. M.
(1991). Ecosystem preservation and the economy in the Greater Yellowstone area. Conservation Biology, 5(3), 395-404.
29.
Schmidt, D. D.
(1989). Citizen lawmakers: The ballot initiative revolution. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
Thomas, C. S.
(1991). The West and its brand of politics. In C. S. Thomas (Ed.), Politics and public policy in the contemporary American West. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
31.
Tremblay, K. R.
, & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Rural residence and concern with environmental quality: A replication and extension. Rural Sociology, 43(3), 474-491.
32.
Van Liere, K. D.
, & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181-197.
