Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Previous research based on a sample of the best applications to the State and Local Government Innovation Awards (1990-1994) identified the most frequently observed characteristics of public management innovations: They are holistic, use new information technology, incorporate process improvements, empower citizens and communities, and involve partnerships with the private sector. This sample also demonstrated the importance of middle managers and front-line staff as initiators, indicated that the innovations were more frequently a response to internal problems or opportunities than crises, and showed that the innovations were more frequently the result of planning than of Behn’s model of “groping along.” This research was replicated with three new samples of innovations: applications to the Institute of Public Administration of Canada’s public management innovation award, the Innovations in American Government awards, and the Commonwealth Association for Public Administration and Management innovation awards. Preliminary results for all three replications were similar to the original study.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bardach, E. (1998). Managerial craftsmanship: Getting agencies to work together. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing in government. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Behn, R. (1988). Management by groping along. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 7, 643-663.

Behn, R. (1991). Leadership counts: Lessons for public managers from the Massachusetts welfare, training, and employment program. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Borins, S. (1998). Innovating with integrity: How local heroes are transforming American government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Borins, S. (2000). What border? Public management innovation in the United States and Canada. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19, 46-74.

Golden, O. (1990). Innovation in public sector human services programs: The implications of innovation by “groping along.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9, 219-248.

Kanter, R. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.

Levin, M. , & Sanger, B. (1992). Using old stuff in new ways: Innovation as a case of evolutionary tinkering. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11, 88-115.

10.

Levin, M. , & Sanger, B. (1994). Making government work: How entrepreneurial executives turn bright ideas into real results. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning: Reconceiving roles for planning, plans, and planners. New York: Free Press.

12.

Osborne, D. , & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

13.

Roberts, N. , & King, P. (1996). Transforming public policy: Dynamics of policy entrepreneurship and innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

14.

Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

15.

Wilson, J. (1966). Innovation in organization: Notes toward a theory. In J. Thompson (Ed.), Approaches to organization design (pp. 194-218). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Public Management Innovation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References