Revitalization efforts often require some commitment of tax dollars for the costs of the related-development projects. Elected and appointed officials often need to gauge support for these investments if electoral approval is required. Contingent valuation surveys can be a precise tool to understand support and concern among different groups of residents. This study illustrates a refined methodology and method for looking at the value placed on a new town center and the required public investment. The results illustrate that there is a considerable base of support for the plan and its financing, but officials would also need to implement an identified strategy to insure electoral support from a majority of residents.
ArrowK.SolowR.PortneyP.LeamerE.RadnerR.SchumanH. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, 4605-4614.
2.
BaadeR. (1996). Professional Sports as Catalysts for Metropolitan Economic Development. Journal of Urban Affairs, 18 (1), 1-17.
3.
BierT. (2006). Analysis of home sellers and buyers. Unpublished manuscript, Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH.
4.
BierT.PostC. (2003). Vacating the city: An analysis of new homes v. household growth. Discussion paper prepared for the Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC.
5.
BrubakerE. (2004). Eliciting the public’s budgetary preferences: Insights from contingent valuation. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24, 72-95.
6.
CameronT. A.HuppertD. D. (1991). Referendum Contingent Valuation Estimates: Sensitivity to the Assignment of Offered Values. Journal of American Statistical Association, 86 (416), 910-918.
7.
CameronT. A.QuigginJ. (1994). Estimation using contingent valuation data a “dichotomous choice with follow-up” Questionnaire. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 27, 218-234.
8.
CoatesD.HumphreysB.R. (1999). The growth effects of sport franchises, stadia, and arenas. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18 (4), 601-624.
9.
CummingsS. (Ed.). (1988). Business Elites and Urban Development. Albany: State University of New York.
10.
CusumanoG.BohlC. C. (2002). Place making: Development town centers, main streets, and urban villages. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
11.
DiamondP.HausmannJ. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 45-64.
12.
FreemanA. M. (1979). The benefits of environmental improvement. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
GrubisichT. (2006). Reston two center: The upside of a suburban downtown. Los Angeles, CA: Planetizen. Retrieved from http://www.planetizen.com/node/20938
15.
HanemannM. (1994). Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of economic perspectives, 8, 19-43.
16.
HowieP.MurphyS.WicksJ. (2010). An application of state preference method to value urban amenities. Urban Studies, 47, 235-256.
17.
HoymanM.FaricyC. (2009). It Takes a Village: A Test of the Creative Class, Social Capital, and Human Capital Theories. Urban Affairs Review, 44 (3), 311-333.
18.
JacobsJ. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Modern Library.
19.
JohnsonB. K.GroothuisP. A.WhiteheadJ. C. (2001). The value of public goods generated by a major league sports team: The CVM approach. Journal of Sports Economics, 2, 6-21.
20.
JohnsonB. K.WhiteheadJ. C.MasonD. S.WalkerG. J. (2007). Willingness to pay for amateur sports and recreation programs. Contemporary Economic Policy, 25, 553-564.
21.
KanninenB. J. (1995). Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 114-125.
LindseyG.PatersonR.LugerM. (1995). Using contingent valuation surveys in environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61, 252-262.
24.
MalangaS. (2004). The curse of the creative class. City Journal, Winter, 36-45.
25.
MarshallA. (1920). Principles of economics: An introductory volume. London, UK: Macmillan.
26.
MitchellR. C.CarsonR. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
27.
PeckJ. (2005). Struggling with the Creative Class. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research, 29 (4), 740-770.
28.
PettsJ. (1994). Effective waste management: Understanding and dealing with public concerns. Waste Management and Research, 12, 207-222.
29.
PortneyP. (1994). The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3-17.
RelphE. (2008). The suburban downtowns of the greater Toronto area. Canadian Geographer, 35, 421-435.
32.
RosentraubM. S. (2010). Major league winners: The use of sports and culture for economic development. New York, NY: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis.
33.
RosentraubM. S.MikelbankB.PostC. (2010). Residential property tax abatements and rebuilding Cleveland, Ohio. State and Local Government Review, 44, 104-117.
34.
RosentraubM. S.SwindellD. (2009). Doing better: Sports, economic impact analysis, and schools of public policy & administration. Journal of Public Administration Education, 15, 219-242.
35.
RosentraubM. S.SwindellD.TsvetkovaS. (2009). Public Dollars, Sports Facilities, and Intangible Benefits: The Value of a Team to a Region’s Residents and Tourists. Journal of Tourism, 9 (2), 133-159.
36.
SchumpeterJ. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.
37.
SimonsR.Winson-GeidemanK. (2005). Determining market perceptions of residential property buyers using contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Real Estate Research, 27, 193-220.
38.
SquiresG. (Ed.). (1989). Unequal Partnerships: The political economy of urban redevelopment in postwar America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
39.
ThompsonE.BergerM.BlomquistG.AllenS. (2002). Valuing the arts: A contingent valuation approach. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26, 87-113.
40.
TreimanT.GartnerJ. (2006). Are residents willing to pay for their community forests?Urban Studies, 43, 1537-1547.
WalkerM.MondelloM. J. (2007). Moving Beyond Economic Impact: A Closer Look at the Contingent Valuation Method. International Journal of Sport, 2, 149-160.
44.
WaltonH.LongoA.DawsonP. (2008). A Contingent Valuation of the 2012 London Olympic Games: A Regional Perspective. Journal of Sports Economics, 9 (3), 304-317.
45.
WhiteheadJ. C. (2005). Environmental Risk and Averting Behavior: Predictive Validity of Revealed and Stated Preference Data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(2), 301-316.
