Nonprofit organizations must address their social missions while breaking even financially, facing trade-offs between mission responsive and financially rewarding actions, including alternative pricing policies. The paper draws on alternative theories of nonprofit pricing. In one theory, nonprofits price their services to maximize net revenue. In another theory, nonprofits price their services to achieve maximum mission impact within the constraint of financial solvency. These theories are explored through case studies of three multi-service organizations in a local social services federation. Alternative behavioral patterns are found, including pricing to balance financial and mission impacts on a service by service basis as well as differentiated, strategic pricing policies to achieve overall mission impact. In all cases nonprofit managers struggle with pricing-related mission-market tensions and could benefit from a system to help them resolve these tensions. One case is described in depth as an exemplar of how such a system can be developed.
Associated Press. (2003a, October 1). National briefing south: Kentucky: Shelter ends fee for families. The New York Times, p. 17.
4.
Associated Press. (2003b, September 28). Salvation Army shelter charges families to stay. The New York Times, p. 17.
5.
Bell-Rose, S. ( 2004). Using performance metrics to assess impact. In S. M. Oster, C. W. Massarsky , & S. Beinhacker (Eds.), Generating and sustaining nonprofit earned income (pp. 269-280). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Bowen, W.G., Nygren, T.I., Turner, S.E., & Duffy, E.A. ( 1994). The charitable nonprofits. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
7.
Brown, E., & Slivinski, A. ( 2006). Nonprofit organizations and the market. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 140-158), New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Chetkovich, C., & Frumkin, P. ( 2003). Balancing margin and mission: Nonprofit competition in charitable versus fee-based programs. Administration & Society, 35, 564-596.
9.
Clark, C., Rosensweig, W., Long, D., & Olsen, S. ( 2004). Double bottom line project report: Assessing social impact in double bottom line ventures. Retrieved December 17, 2004 , from http://www.riseproject.org/DBL_Method_Catalog.pdf
DeParle, J. ( 2005, May 29). Goals reached, donor on right closes up shop . The New York Times, pp. 1, 21.
12.
Dickason, J.H., & Neuhauser, D. ( 2000). Closing a foundation: The Lucile P. Markey Charitable Trust. Washington, DC: Council on Foundations.
13.
Foster, W., & Bradach, J. ( 2005). Should nonprofits seek profits?Harvard Business Review, February, 92-100.
14.
Gray, B.H., & Schlesinger, M. (2002). Health. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 65-106). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
15.
Hager, M., Galsaskiewicz, J., Bielefeld, W., & Pins, J. ( 1996). Tales from the grave: Organizations’ accounts of their own demise. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 975-994.
16.
James, E. ( 1983). How nonprofits grow: A model. Journal of Public Policy Analysis and Management, 2, 350-365.
17.
James, E. ( 1998). Commercialism among nonprofits: Objectives, opportunities, and constraints. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), To profit or not to profit (pp. 271-285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. ( 1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
19.
Kendall, J. & Knapp, M. ( 2000). Measuring the performance of voluntary organisations . Public Management, 2, 105-132.
20.
Kirp, D.L. ( 2003). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Kramer, R.M. ( 1981). Voluntary agencies in the welfare state. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Kramer, R.M. ( 1987). Voluntary agencies and the personal social services. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 240-257). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Liebschutz, S.F. ( 1992). Coping by nonprofit organizations during the Reagan years . Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 2, 363-380.
24.
Paton, R. ( 2003). Managing and measuring social enterprises. London: Sage.
25.
Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
26.
Smith, S.R. ( 2002). Social services. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 149-186). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
27.
Smith, S.R., & Lipsky, M. ( 1993). Nonprofits for hire. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
28.
Stewart, D.M., Kane, P.R., & Scruggs, L. ( 2002). Education and training. In L. M. Salamon (ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 107-148). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
29.
Treffinger, S. ( 2005, May 26). Clinic grilled over charity status. The Plain Dealer, pp. A1-A6.
30.
Weisbrod, B.A. ( 2004). The pitfalls of profits. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, 40-47.
31.
Weisbrod, B. A. (Ed.). (1998). To profit or not to profit. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Wyszomirski, M.J. ( 2002). Arts and culture. In L. M. Salamon (ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 187-218). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33.
Young, D.R., & Finch, S.J. ( 1977). Foster care and nonprofit agencies. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
34.
Young, D.R., & Steinberg, R. ( 1995). Economics for nonprofit managers. New York: The Foundation Center.
