Louisville’s consolidation with Jefferson County was the first large-scale merger to take place in the United States in more than 30 years. The authors examine this merger as a major institutional innovation that was supposed to enhance economic development. Proponents of consolidation claimed that institutional change would “shake up” the system and create an economic boom. The authors use actual results to determine whether this much-heralded experience warrants claims that it can be a role model, point of reference, or best practice. In doing this, they compare data from premerged and postmerged Louisville over a full 8-year period. Of central concern are whether “shake up” worked, how elites manage results as unsatisfying outcomes become apparent, and what that behavior portends for responsible governance. The authors conclude with a number of principles and policies regarding institutional change.
Abramson, J. ( 2004, January 8). Speech delivered at the Rotary Club Forum on State of the City, Louisville, KY.
2.
Abramson, J. ( 2006, October 20). Interviewed on State Affairs. WFPL, Louisville, KY.
3.
Abramson, J. ( 2007, January 18). Speech delivered at the Rotary Club Forum on State of the City, Louisville, KY.
4.
Abramson, J. ( 2008, January 17). Speech delivered at the Rotary Club Forum on State of the City, Louisville, KY.
5.
Akerlof, G. ( 1970). The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
6.
Alliance for Regional Stewardship. (2005, November 8-9). Lessons in merger. Louisville, KY: Metro TV.
7.
Archibald, R., & Sleeper, S. ( 2008). Government consolidation and economic development in Allegheny County and the city of Pittsburgh. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
8.
Bennett, E., & Gatz, C. ( 2008). Louisville Kentucky: A restoring prosperity case . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
9.
Bish, L.R. ( 2001). Local government amalgamations: Discredited nineteenth-century ideals alive in the twenty-first (C.D. Howe Institute commentary ). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Renouf .
10.
Blomquist, W., & Parks, R.B. ( 1995). Fiscal, service, and political impacts of Indianapolis-Marion County’s unigov. Publius, 25(4), 37-54.
11.
Boarnet, M.G., & Haughwout, A. ( 2000). Do highways matter? Evidence and policy implications of highways’ influence on metropolitan development (Discussion paper) . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
12.
Booth, D.A. ( 1963). Metropolitics: The Nashville consolidation. East Lansing: Michigan State University .
13.
Bretschneider, S., Marc-Auriele, F., & Wu, J. ( 2004). Best practices research: A methodological guide for the perplexed. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 15(2), 307-323.
14.
Brookings Institution. (2002). Beyond merger: A competitive vision for the regional city of Louisville. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
Bruce, R. ( 1999, November 4). Forum on county government reorganization . Louisville, KY: Rotary Club .
16.
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2008). Regional economic accounts. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://www.bea.gov/regional
17.
Burns, N. ( 1994). The formation of American local governments. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Carr, J., Bae, S., & Lu, W. ( 2006). City-county government and promises of economic development: A tale of two cities. State and Local Government Review, 38(3), 131-141.
19.
Carr, J., & Feiock, R. ( 1999). Metropolitan governance and economic development . Urban Affairs Review, 34, 476-488.
20.
Carr, J., & Feiock, R. (Eds.). (2004). City-county consolidation and its alternatives. Reshaping the local government landscape . New York: M.E. Sharpe.
21.
Commercial Kentucky. (2007). Louisville vacancy office rates . Louisville, KY: Cushman and Wakefield Alliance. http://www.commercialkentucky.com. [accessed March 5, 2008].
22.
Coomes, P. ( 2000, October 15). Why an economist favors reforming government . Courier Journal, p. D1.
23.
Downs, A. ( 1957). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston : Little, Brown.
24.
Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J., & Swanstrom, T. ( 2004). Place matters (2nd ed.). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas .
25.
Durning, D. ( 1995). The effects of city-county government consolidation: The perspectives of united government employees in Athens-Clark County, Georgia . Public Administration Quarterly, 19(4), 272-298.
26.
Eckstein, H. ( 1975). Case study and theory in political science. In F. Greenstein & N. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science (pp. 79-138). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Feagin, J., Orum, A. , & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.). (1991). A case for the case study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
28.
Feiock, R., Carr, J., & Johnson, L. ( 2006). Structuring the debate on consolidation: A response to Leland and Thurmaier. Public Administration Review, 66, 274-278.
29.
Foster, K. ( 1993). Exploring the links between political structure and metropolitan growth. Political Geography, 12(6), 523-547.
30.
Galster, G. (Ed.). (1996). Reality and research. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
31.
Gerring, J. ( 2007). Case study research. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
Greenblatt, A. ( 2003, November). Merger maestro: Orchestrating the rise of greater Louisville. Governing, p. 28.
34.
Hansen, B. ( 2001). The new econometrics of structural change: Dating breaks in U.S. labor productivity. Journal of Economic Perspectives , 15(4), 117-128.
35.
Ideastream. (2007, November 29). Ideas. Cleveland, OH: Public Broadcasting System.
36.
Imbroscio, D. ( 2006). Shaming the inside game: A critique of the liberal expansionist approach to addressing urban problems. Urban Affairs Review , 42(2), 224-249.
37.
Jefferson County Property Valuation Administrator. (2008). Real property assessed value report. Retrieved July 15, 2008 , from http://www.pvalouky.org/en/assess_jc_stats.php
38.
Kentucky Educational Television. (2004, December 12). Metro, act one. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.ket.org/pressroom/2004/49/KMTRO_.html
39.
Leland, S., & Thurmaier, K. (Eds.). (2004). Case studies of city-county consolidation: Reshaping the local government landscape. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
40.
Leland, S., & Thurmaier, K. ( 2005). When efficiency is unbelievable: Normative lessons from 30 years of city-county consolidations. Public Administration Review, 65, 475-489.
41.
Leland, S., & Thurmaier, K. ( 2007, April). Structural efficiencies in city-county consolidation: Promises made, promises kept?Paper presented at the Urban Affairs Association meeting, Seattle, WA.
42.
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Revenue Commission. ( 2007). Comprehensive annual financial reports. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.louisvilleky.gov/Revenue/
43.
Louisville Metro TV. (2005, November 8-9). Lessons in merger Louisville [Television broadcast]. Louisville, KY: Author.
44.
Louisville Metropolitan Sewer District. (2007 , February 13, 15). Mayor Abramson unveils $67 million community plan for drainage challenges and project DRI. Retrieved February 15, 2007, from http://www.msdlouky.org/projectdri/about.cfm
45.
Lyons, W. ( 1977). The politics of city-county merger: The Lexington-Fayette County experience. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
46.
Martin, R. ( 1993). A Quiet Revolution: Jacksonville-Duval County Consolidation and the Dynamics of Urban Reform. Jacksonville : White Publishing Company.
47.
Metropolitan Housing Coalition . (2007). State of metropolitan housing report. Louisville, KY: Author.
48.
Miller, D. ( 2002). The regional governing of metropolitan America . Boulder, CO: Westview.
49.
Myers, S., Smith, H., & Martin, L. ( 2004). Conducting best practices research in public affairs (Working paper). Orlando: University of Central Florida, Center for Community Partnership.
50.
Nalbandian, J. ( 1999). Facilitating community, enabling democracy: New roles for local government managers. Public Administration Review , 59, 187-197.
51.
Nelson, A., & Foster, K.C. ( 1999). Metropolitan governance structure and income growth . Journal of Urban Affairs, 21(3), 309-324.
52.
North, D. ( 1990). Institutional change and economic performance . New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
ODS Comptroller. (2002). Best practices and benchmarking: Making worthwhile comparisons. Retrieved February 5, 2008, from http://osd.dtic.mil/comptroller/icenter/learn/bestpracconcept.pdf
54.
Owen, J., & Willbern, Y. ( 1985). Governing metropolitan Indianapolis: The politics of unigov. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
Parr, J., Riehm, J., & McFarland, C. ( 2006). Guide to successful local government collaboration in America’s regions. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
56.
Paytas, J. ( 2001). Does governance matter? The dynamics of metropolitan governance and competitiveness. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon Center for Economic Development.
57.
Peirce, N. ( 2004, April 25). Louisville’s metro: So far, a major success . Washington Post Writers Group. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http://www.postwritersgroup.com/archives/peir0419.htm
58.
Rheim, J. ( 2005). Lessons in Merger. Louisville, KY : Louisville Metro TV.
59.
Riggs, D. ( 2006, August 9). State of affairs interviews with Carolyn Gatz and Dennis Riggs, Greater Louisville Project, Mary Griffith, vice chair National City Bank and Amy Lou, Brookings Institution. WFPL radio interview .
60.
Rise of the super-mayor. (2008). Economist, 386, 38-40.
61.
River Fields. ( 2002, February 25). Response to the draft environmental impact statement for the Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project . Louisville, KY: Author.
62.
Romzek, B. ( 1998). Where the buck stops: Accountability in reformed public organizations. In P. W. Ingraham, J. Thompson, & R. Sanders (Eds.), Transforming government: Lessons from the reinvention laboratories (pp. 193-219). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
63.
Rosenbaum, W., & Kammerer, G. ( 1974). Against long odds: The theory and practice of successful governmental consolidation. Beverly Hills, CA : Sage.
64.
Rosentraub, M.S. ( 2000). City-county consolidation and the rebuilding of image: The fiscal lessons. State and Local Government Review , 32(3), 180-191.
65.
Rusk, D. ( 1993). Cities without suburbs. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rusk, D. ( 2006). Annexation and the fiscal fate of cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution . http://www.3.brookings.edu/metro/pubs/20060810_fateofcities.pdf [accessed April 22, 2007].
68.
Savitch, H., & Vogel, R. ( 2000). Metropolitan consolidation versus metropolitan governance in Louisville. State and Local Government Review , 32(3), 198-212.
69.
Savitch, H., & Vogel, R. ( 2004). Suburbs without a city: Power and city-county consolidation . Urban Affairs Review, 39(6), 758-790.
70.
Shafer, S. ( 2004a, January 2). Louisville gladly becomes model for merger . Courier Journal, p. 01B.
71.
Shafer, S. ( 2004b, January 9). Abramson predicts economic growth . Courier Journal, p. 01B.
72.
Snyder, S. ( 2000, June). Vote yes first debate of the Louisville metro merger-Is it working?Louisville, KY: KET2.
73.
Snyder, S. ( 2005, November 8-9). Lessons in merger. Louisville, KY: Metro TV.
74.
Stallings, A. ( 1999). A house divided: Residential segregation in metropolitan Louisville. Louisville, KY: Metropolitan Housing Coalition.
75.
Stansel, D. ( 2005). Local decentralization and local economic growth: A cross sectional examination of US metropolitan areas. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(1), 55-72.
76.
Stephens, G., & Wikstrom, N. ( 2000). Metropolitan government and governance: Theoretical perspectives, empirical analysis, and the future. New York : Oxford University Press.
77.
Swanson, B. ( 2000). Quandaries of pragmatic reform: A reassessment of the Jacksonville experience. State and Local Government Review , 32(3), 227-238.
78.
Temple, D. ( 1972). Merger politics: Local government consolidation in Tidewater, Virginia. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
79.
Tharp, W. ( 2004). Employment effects of major league sports franchise relocation: A shift-share analysis. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville.
80.
University of Louisville, Department of Sociology. ( 2004). Louisville Metropolitan Survey. Louisville, KY: Author.
81.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Segregation and dissimilarity indices for metro areas. Retrieved November 18, 2007, from http://www.censusscope.org/us/rank_dissimilarity_white_black.html
82.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). American Community Survey. Washington, DC: Author.
83.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2008a). County business patterns, zip code business patterns. Washington, DC: Author.
84.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2008b). EPACD, register analysis branch. Zip code business patterns. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://censtats.census.gov/cbpnaic/cbpnaic.shtml
85.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2008c). American Community Survey. Washington, DC: Author.
86.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. ( 2008a). County data. Washington, DC : Author.
87.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. ( 2008b). Labor Market Areas (2008). Washington, DC: Author.
88.
U.S. InternalRevenue Service. ( 2005). Country to Country Migration Rate. Washington, DC: Author.
89.
U.S. InternalRevenue Service. ( 2008). Zip Code Area Tables. Washington, DC: Author.
90.
Wolman, H. ( 1988). Local economic development policy: What explains the divergence between policy analysis and political behavior. Journal of Urban Affairs, 10(1), 19-28.
