Little scholarly attention has focused on understanding the impact of large gifts for small nonprofit organizations or on the mechanisms by which those institutions respond to such events. The authors studied the organizational and governance stresses mega-gifts create by examining the case of the $175 million Ruth Lilly gift to the Modern Poetry Association. The association's governing board successfully adapted to its changed circumstances by self-consciously learning and realigning its responsibilities relative to those of the organization's executive, which required individual and organizational learning. The authors chart the changes and actions that prompted that self-education and draw on the nonprofit organization governance, organizational learning, sense making, and adaptive change literatures to contend that nonprofit organization leaders must recognize that large-scale change will demand adaptive organizational work and require concomitant shifts in the routines of governance, management, and leadership so as to encourage and capture the learning necessary for successful organizational adjustment.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
2.
Barr, J. (2006). The year in review. Retrieved November 2006 from http://www.poetryfoundation.org/foundation/release_letter1206.html
3.
Brown, W.A. (2005). Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(3), 317-339.
4.
Chait, R.P., Ryan, W.P., & Taylor, B.E. (2004). Governance as leadership: Reframing the work of nonprofit boards. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Das, U.S., & Quintyn, M. (2002). Crisis prevention and crisis management: The role of regulatory governance. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
6.
Egelhoff, W.G., & Sen, F. (1992). An information-processing model of crisis management . Management Communication Quarterly, 5(4), 443-484.
7.
Garrard, A. (2005). Newsmakers: John Barr, president, poetry foundation . Philanthropy News Digest, 2006. Retrieved October 23, 2006, from http://foundationcenter.org/pnd/newsmakers/nwsmkr.jhtml?id=1185
8.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
9.
Giving Institute. (2002). Giving USA 2002: The annual report on philanthropy for the Year 2001. Glenview, IL: Giving USA Foundation.
10.
Giving Institute. (2004). Giving USA 2004: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2003. Glenview, IL: Giving USA Foundation.
11.
Giving Institute. (2006). Giving USA 2006: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2005. Glenview, IL: Giving USA Foundation.
12.
Heifetz, R. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
13.
Heimovics, R., & Herman, R. (1990). Responsibility for critical events in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19(1), 59-72.
14.
Hickson, D., Hinings, C.R., Lee, C.A., Schneck, R.E., & Pennings, J.M. (1971). A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 216-229.
15.
Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
16.
Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9(4), 506-521.
17.
Lalonde, C. (2007). The potential contribution of the field of organizational development to crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 15(2), 95-104.
18.
Lenkowsky, L. (2004, February 19). Big bequests: Burdens or blessings?Chronicle of Philanthropy, p. 50.
19.
Lindahl, W.E. (1995). The major gift donor relationship: An analysis of donors and contributions. Nonprofit Management and Leadership , 5(4), 411-432.
20.
Lindahl, W., & Conley, A. (2002) Literature review: Philanthropic fundraising. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 13(1), 91-112.
21.
Lindahl, W.E., & Winship, C. (1992). Predictive models for annual fundraising and major gift fundraising. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3(1), 43-64.
22.
Loosemore, M., & Hughes, W.P. (2001). Confronting social defence mechanisms: Avoiding disorganisation during crises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 9(2), 73-87.
23.
Mathiasen, K. (1990). Board passages: Three key stages in a nonprofit board's life cycle. Washington, DC: BoardSource.
24.
O'Rourke, M. (2002, November 26). Willy lilly nilly. Slate. Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://slate.com/?id=2074627
25.
Ostrower, F., & Stone, M. (2006). Governance: Research trends, gaps, and future prospects. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 612-628). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
Panas, J. (1984). Mega gifts, who gives them, who gets them. Chicago: Pluribus.
27.
Paumgarten, N. (2002, December 2). A hundred million. The New Yorker. Retrieved October 23, 2006, from http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2002/12/02/021202ta_talk_paumgarten
28.
Pearson, C.M., & Clair, J.A. (1998). Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 59-76.
29.
Pearson, C.M., & Mitroff, I.I. (1993). From crisis prone to crisis prepared: A framework for crisis management. Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), 48-59.
30.
Perrow, C. (1963). Reality shock: A new organization confronts the custody-treatment dilemma. Social Problems, 10(4), 374-382.
31.
Robert, B., & Lajtha, C. (2002). A new approach to crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 10(4), 181-191.
32.
Roux-Dufort, C. (2007) Is crisis management (only) a management of exceptions ? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 15(2), 105-114.
33.
Saidel, J. (2002). Guide to the literature on governance: An annotated bibliography. Washington, DC: BoardSource .
34.
Schein, E.H. (1996). Organizational learning: What is new? (Working Paper 3912). Retrieved August 25, 2004, from https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721.1/2628/1/SWP-3912-35650568.pdf
35.
Schramm, W. (1971). Notes on case studies of instructional media projects . Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development.
36.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
37.
Smith, D. (1990). Beyond contingency planning: Towards a model of crisis management. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 4, 263-275.
38.
`t Hart, P., Rosenthal, U., & Kouzmin, A. (1993). Crisis decision-making: The centralization thesis revisited. Administration & Society, 25(1), 12-45.
39.
Valente, J. (2005). The well-endowed "poetry" magazine. Weekend Edition, National Public Radio. Retrieved January 6, 2006, from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4661917
40.
Weick, K.E. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 305-317.
41.
Wood, M.M. (1992). Is governing board behavior cyclical? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3(2), 139-164.
42.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Zaid, M. (1969). The power and functions of boards and directors: A theoretical synthesis. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 97-111.
