This study relates end-user satisfaction to three design features of public agencies that provide services. The research connects the discussion on public participation in administrative processes with a core consideration of public administration: the design features of public organizations. The study seeks to move from the descriptive literature to an empirically grounded survey methodology that examines end-user satisfaction across varied levels of government. Based on a sample of 2,816 end users of 17 public sector organizations, the study tests for associations between organizational performance features and service satisfaction. The findings correlate user satisfaction with three design characteristics of public agencies: agency dependence on user satisfaction for future funding, a clearly identifiable end-user focus by the agency, and the ability of the user to exercise choice in her or his future use of the agency’s services. These findings provide a methodology for survey of public preferences that connects agency performance with public agency design.
Anderson, E. W.
, & Fornell, C. (2000). Foundations of the American customer satisfaction index. Total Quality Management, 1(7), 869-883.
2.
Aron, A.
, & Aron, E. N. (1994). Statistics for psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Barzelay, M.
(2001). The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Boyne, G. A.
(2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 367-394.
5.
Brewer, G. A.
, & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 685-712.
6.
Burke, B. F.
, & Wright, D. S. (2002). Reassessing and reconciling reinvention in the American states: Exploring state administrative performance. State and Local Government Review, 34(1), 7-17.
7.
Cronin, J. J., Jr.
, & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
8.
DeLeon, L.
, & Denhardt, R. B. (2000). The political theory of reinvention. Public Administration Review, 60(2), 89-97.
9.
Denhardt, J.
, & Denhardt, R. (2003). The new public service: Steering, not serving. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
10.
Eklöf, J.
, & Westlund, A. (2002). The pan-European customer satisfaction index programme: Current work and the way ahead. Total Quality Management, 11(8), 1099-1106.
11.
Fornell, C.
(2001). The score of satisfaction. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 120-121.
12.
Fountain, J. E.
(2001). Paradoxes of public-sector customer service. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 14(1), 55-73.
13.
Gilbert, G. R.
, Nicholls, J. A. F., & Roslow, S. (1998). Measuring public-sector customer service satisfaction. Public Manager, 26(4), 21-25.
14.
Gilbert, G. R.
, Roslow, S., & Nicholls, J. A. F. (1997). Customer satisfaction with personal service and the service setting: Developments in marketing science. In E. Wilson&J. H. Hair, Jr. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Academy of Marketing Science, Academy of Marketing Science, Coral Gables, FL, 20.
15.
Gorsuch, R. L.
(1974). Factor analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
16.
Green, S. B.
, & Salkind, N. J. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Hall, M. J.
(2002). The American customer satisfaction index. Public Manager, 31(1), 23-30.
18.
Hood, C.
, & Jackson, M. (1991). Administrative argument. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.
19.
Hood, C.
, & Peters, G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management: Into the age of paradox?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267-283.
20.
Hyde, A. C.
(1991). Feedback from customers, clients, and captives. The Bureaucrat: The Journal for Public Managers, 20(4), 49-53.
21.
Kelly, J. M.
, & Swindell, D. (2003). The case for the inexperienced user: Rethinking filter questions in citizen satisfaction surveys. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 91-108.
22.
Kirlin, J. J.
(1996). What government must do well: Creating public value for society. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 161-185.
23.
Light, P. C.
(1997). The tides of reform: Making government work 1945-1995. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
March, J.
, & Olsen, J. (1983). Organizing political life: What administrative reform tells us about government. American Political Science Review, 77(2), 81-96.
25.
McColl-Kennedy, J.
, & Scheneider, U. (2000). Measuring customer satisfaction: Why, what and how. Total Quality Management, 11(7), S883-S896.
26.
McIntyre, S. H.
, & Currim, I. S. (1982). Evaluating judgment based marketing models: Multiple measures, comparisons, and findings. In A. Zoltners (Ed.), Marketing Planning Models: TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences (pp. 185-207). New York: North-Holland.
27.
Moe, R.
(2003). Administrative renewal: Reorganization commissions in the 20th century. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
28.
Moe, R. C.
, & Gilmour, R. S. (1995). Rediscovering principles of public administration: The neglected foundation of public law. Public Administration Review, 55(2), 135-146.
29.
Moe, T.
(1989). The politics of bureaucratic structure. In J. E. Chubb & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), Can the government govern? (pp. 267-329). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30.
Moore, M.
(1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Moynihan, D. P.
(2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, D.C. American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164-186.
32.
Nunnally, J. C.
(1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Osborne, D.
, & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. New York: Addison-Wesley.
34.
Parasuraman, A.
, Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 41-50.
35.
Rainey, H. G.
, & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(2), 1-32.
36.
Redford, E.
(1969). Democracy in the administrative state. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Russett, B. M.
(1967). International regions and international integration. Chicago: Rand McNally.
38.
Serra, G.
(1995). Citizen-initiated contact and satisfaction with bureaucracy: A multi-variate analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 175-188.
39.
Spence, M. T.
, & Brucks, M. (1997). The moderating effects of problem characteristics on experts’ and novices’ judgments. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 233-248.
40.
Streib, G. D.
, & Poister, T. H. (1999). Assessing the validity, legitimacy, and functionality of performance measure systems in municipal government. American Review of Public Administration, 29(2), 107-123.
41.
Swindell, D.
, & Kelly, J. M. (2002). A multiple-indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 610-620.
42.
Swiss, J. E.
(1992). Adapting total quality management (TQM) to government. Public Administration Review, 52(4), 356-362.
43.
Terry, L. D.
(1998). Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the public management movement. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 194-200.
44.
Thomas, J. C.
(1999). Bringing the public in public administration: The struggle continues. Public Administration Review, 59(1), 83-88.
45.
Thomas, J. C.
, & Melkers, J. (1999). Explaining citizen-initiated contacts with municipal bureaucrats: Lessons from the Atlanta experience. Urban Affairs Review, 34(5), 667-690.
46.
Thomas, J. C.
, & Streib, G. (2003). The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 83-102.
47.
Thompson, J. R.
(1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
48.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget
. (2002). The president’s management agenda. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budintegration/pma_index.html
49.
Van Ryzin, G.G.
, Muzzio, D., Immerwahr, S., Gulick, L., & Martinez, E. (2004). Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: An application of the American customer satisfaction index model to New York. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 331-340.
50.
Waldo, D.
(1977). Democracy, bureaucracy, and hypocrisy. Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California.
51.
The World Bank
. (1997). World development report: The state in a changing world. New York: Oxford University Press.
