This article examines local economic development goals and policies in Canada and the United States during a 7year period. The analysis is based on surveys of cities with a population greater than 10,000 in the two countries conducted in 1994 and 2001, allowing for an assessment of the extent of change versus stability in overall approach toward economic development. Economic development priorities in both U.S. and Canadian cities have remained relatively stable, focusing most heavily on traditional economic development strategies. Cities in both countries are tightening their focus on a traditional package of policies and thus appear to be institutionalizing their approaches. Whereas U.S. cities manifest a more passive role for government, Canadian cities reflect a more active role through partnerships that require an active professional staff.
Anderson, C. W.
(1971). Comparative policy analysis: The design of measures. Comparative Politics, 4, 117-131.
2.
Artibise, A. F. J.
(1988). Canada as an urban nation. Daedalus, 117, 237-264.
3.
Bennett, C. J.
(1990). The formation of a Canadian privacy policy: The art and craft of lesson-drawing. Canadian Public Administration, 33, 551-570.
4.
Bennett, C. J.
(1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it?British Journal of Political Science, 21, 215-233.
5.
Bettison, D. G.
, Kenward, J. K., & Taylor, L. (1975). Urban affairs in Alberta. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta Press.
6.
Blakely, E. J.
(1994). Planning local economic development theory and practice(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Davies, W. K. D.
, & Donoghue, D. P. (1993). Economic diversification and group stability in an urban system: The case of Canada, 1951-1986. Urban Studies, 70(7), 1165-1186.
8.
Davies, W. K. D.
, & Murdie, R. A. (1994). The social complexity of Canadian metropolitan areas in 1986: A multivariate analysis of census data. In F. Frisken (Ed.), The changing Canadian metropolis: A public policy perspective(pp. 203-236). Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
9.
Eisinger, P. K.
(1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
10.
Eisinger, P. K.
(1999). State economic development in the 1990s. In J. P. Blair & L. A. Reese (eds.), Approaches to economic development(pp. 178-190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Feldman, L. D.
,& Graham, K. A. (1981). Intergovernmental relations and urban growth: A Canadian view. In L. D. Feldman(Ed.), Politics and government of urban Canada(4th ed.) Toronto: Methuen.
12.
Garber, J.
, & Imbroscio, D. (1996). The myth of the North American city reconsidered. Urban Affairs Review, 31, 595-624.
13.
Goldberg, M.
, & Mercer, J. (1986). The myth of the north American city: Continentalism challenged. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
14.
Hill, E. W.
, & Brennan, J. F. (2000). A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 65–96.
15.
Hoberg, G.
(1991). Sleeping with an elephant: The American influence on Canadian environmental regulation. Journal of Public Policy, 11, 107-132.
16.
International City/County Management Association
. (1988). Economic development surveys. Washington, DC: Author.
17.
International City/County Management Association
. (1999). Economic development surveys. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
Leo, C.
, & Fenton, R. (1990). “Mediated enforcement” and the evolution of the state: Development corporations in Canadian city centers. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 14(2), 185-206.
19.
Mossberger, K.
, & Wolman, H. (2003). Policy transfer as a form of prospective policy evaluation: Challenges and recommendations. Public Administration Review, 63, 428-440.
20.
Randall, R.
(1994, March). U.S. and Canadian urban vitality: A metropolitan analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, New Orleans, LA.
21.
Reese, L. A.
(1993, June). Local economic development practices across the northern border. Urban Affairs Quarterly, pp. 571-592.
22.
Reese, L. A.
(1997). Local economic development policy: The U.S. and Canada. New York: Garland.
23.
Reese, L. A.
(1998). Sharing the benefits of economic development: What cities utilize type II policies?Urban Affairs Review, 33, 686-711.
24.
Reese, L. A.
,& Fasenfest, D. (1996, June). Local economic development policy in Canada and the U.S.: Similarities and differences. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, pp. 100-121.
25.
Reese, L. A.
, & Fasenfest, D. (1997). What works best? Values and the evaluation of local economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 195-221.
26.
Reese, L. A.
, & Rosenfeld, R. A. (2002). The civic culture of local economic development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Rochefort, D. A.
,& Goering, P. (1998). More a link than a division: How Canada has learned from U.S. mental health policy. Health Affairs, 17, 110-127.
28.
Rose, R.
(1991). What is lesson-drawing?Journal of Public Policy, 11, 3-30.
29.
Rothblatt, D. N.
(1994). North American metropolitan planning: Canadian and U.S. perspectives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60, 501-520.
30.
Sancton, D.
(1983). Conclusion: Canadian city politics in comparative perspective. In W. Magusson & A. Sancton (Eds.), City government in Canada(pp. 291-317). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
31.
Smart, A.
(1994). Recent developments in the theory of the state and the changing Canadian metropolis: Implications of each for the other. In F. Frisken (Ed.), The changing Canadian metropolis: A public policy perspective(pp. 561-579). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
32.
Turner, R. S.
,& Garber, J. A. (1994, September). Responding to boom and bust: Urban political economy in Houston and Edmonton. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, NY.
33.
Voytek, K.
,& Ledebur, L. (1991). Is industry targeting a viable economic development strategy? In R. D. Bingham& R. Mier (Eds.), Dilemmas of urban economic development(pp. 171-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Whelan, R. K.
(1989). Urban redevelopment in Montreal: A comparative, North American perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association.
35.
Woodside, K.
(1990). An approach to studying local government autonomy: The Ontario experience. Canadian Public Administration, 33, 198-213.
