Despite the importance of budget reform and its seeming connections to the environment, few studies have analyzed the determinants of budget reform and the effects of environment on budget systems. This article presents a framework for understanding changes in local government budgetary process and format. Based on survey results from 100 of the 159 counties in Georgia, it examines empirically the effects of both internal and external factors on changing the budget system. The authors found that county managers and the external environment have a very strong influence on changing budget process and budget format. The article also identifies various perceived effects of budget changes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Axelrod, D. (1995). Budgeting for modern government(2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin’s.
2.
Behn, R. D. (1988). Management by groping along. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 7, 643-663.
3.
Bruton, G. D.,& Hildreth, W. B. (1993). Strategic public planning: External orientations and strategic planning team members. American Review of Public Administration, 23, 307-317.
4.
Bryson, J. M., & Roering, W. D. (1988). Initiation of strategic planning by governments. Public Administration Review, 48, 995-1004.
5.
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (1997). Regional economic information system, 1969-95[CD-ROMversion]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
6.
Caiden, N. (1983). Guidelines to federal budget reform. Public Budgeting and Finance, 3, 4-22.
7.
Caiden, N., & Wildavsky, A. (1980). Planning and budgeting in poor countries(2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
8.
Connelly, M., & Tompkins, G. L. (1989). Does performance matter? A study of state budgeting. Policy Studies Review, 8, 288-299.
9.
Covaleski, M., Dirsmith, M. W., & Jablonsky, S. F. (1985). Traditional and emergent theories of budgeting: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 4, 277-300.
10.
Daft, R. (1995). Organization theory and design(5th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
11.
Fenno, R. F. (1968). The impact of PPBS on the congressional appropriation process. In R. L. Chartrand, K. Handa, & M. Hugo (Eds.), Information support, program budgeting, and the congress(pp. 175-194). New York: Spartan.
12.
Forrester, J. P. (1989). Professionalism and urban reform: An organizational perspective on municipal finance. American Review of Public Administration, 19, 67-85.
13.
Forrester, J. P.,& Adams, G. B. (1997). Budgetary reform through organizational learning: Toward an organizational theory of budgeting. Administration & Society, 28, 466-488.
14.
Forrester, J. P., & Spindler, C. J. (2001). Budgeting theory through “relational learning”. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 4, 107-131.
15.
Gargan, J. J. (1987). The knowledge-interest context of local public finance: Judgments of city finance officers. International Journal of Public Administration, 9, 245-271.
16.
General Accounting Office. (1993). Performance budgeting: State experiences and implications for the federal government(GAO Report No. AFMD-93-41). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
17.
Gianakis, G. A., & McCue, C. P. (1997). Administrative innovation among Ohio local government finance officers. American Review of Public Administration, 27, 270-286.
18.
Griener, L. E. (1967). Patterns of organizational change. Harvard Business Review, 45, 119-128.
19.
Grizzle, G. A. (1986). Does budget format really govern the actions of budgetmakers? Public Budgeting and Finance, 6, 60-70.
20.
Harkin, J. M. (1982). Effectiveness budgeting: The limits of budget reform. Policy Studies Review, 2, 112-126.
21.
Hill, M. B., Jr. (1997). Homerule in Georgia: Introduction. Unpublished manuscript, University of Georgia, Athens.
22.
Huber, G. P., & Glick, W. H. (1993). Sources and forms of organizational change. In G. P. Huber & W. H. Glick (Eds.), Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance(pp. 1-15). New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Huber, G. P., Sutcliffe, K. M., Miller, C. C., & Glick, W. H. (1993). Understanding and predicting organizational change. In G. P. Huber& W. H. Glick (Eds.), Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance(pp. 215-265). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Joyce, P. G. (1993). The reiterative nature of budget reform: Is there anything newin federal budgeting? Public Budgeting and Finance, 13, 36-48.
25.
Joyce, P. G. (1996). Appraising budget appraisal: Can you take politics out of budgeting? Public Budgeting and Finance, 16, 21-25.
26.
Kimberly, J. R. (1975). Environmental constraints and organizational structure. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 20, 1-8.
27.
Kimberly, J. R., & Rottman, D. B. (1987). Environment, organization, and effectiveness: A biographical approach. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 595-622.
28.
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73, 59-67.
29.
Lauth, T. P. (1978). Zero-based budgeting in Georgia state government: Myth and reality. Public Administration Review, 38, 420-430.
30.
Lauth, T. P. (1985). Performance evaluation in the Georgia budgetary process. Public Budgeting & Finance, 5, 67-82.
31.
Levin, M. A.,& Sanger, M. B. (1994). Making government work: How entrepreneurial executives turn bright ideas into real results. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Lynch, T. D., & Lynch, C. (1996). Twenty-first century budget reform: Performance, entrepreneurial, and competitive budgeting. Public Administration Quarterly, 20, 255-284.
33.
McCaffery, J. L. (1996). On budget reform. Policy Sciences, 29, 235-246
34.
Neuby, B. L. (1997). On the lack of a budget theory. Public Administration Quarterly, 21, 131-142.
35.
Osborne, D.,& Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin.
36.
Ott, A. F. (1993). Public sector budgets: Acomparative study. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar PublishingCompany.
37.
Pettijohn, C. D., & Grizzle, G. A. (1997). Structural budget reform: Does it affect budget deliberations? Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, 9, 26-45.
38.
Rainey, H. G. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R.,& Levine, C. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 34, 233-246.
40.
Ramsey, J. R.,& Hackbart, M. M. (1982). Impacts of budget reform: The budget office perspective. State and Local Government Review, 14, 10-15.
41.
Rubin, I. S. (1990a). The politics of public budgeting. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
42.
Rubin, I. S. (1990b). Budget theory and budget practice: How good the fit? Public Administration Review, 50, 179-189.
43.
Rubin, I. S. (1992). Budget reform and political reform: Conclusions from six cities. Public Administration Review, 52, 454-466.
44.
Rubin, I. S. (1996). Budgeting for accountability: Municipal budgeting for the 1990s. Public Budgeting& Finance, 16, 112-132.
45.
Rubin, I. S., & Stein, L. (1990). Budget reform in St. Louis: Why does budgeting change? Public Administration Review, 50, 420-426.
46.
Schick, A. (1966). The road to PPB: The stages of budget reform. Public Administration Review, 26, 243-258.
47.
Schick, A. (1978). The road from ZBB. Public Administration Review, 38, 177-180.
48.
Schick, A. (1980). Budgetary adaptations to resource scarcity. In C. H. Levine& I. S. Rubin (Eds.), Fiscal stress and public policy(pp. 161-133). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49.
Schick, A. (1990). The capacity to budget. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
50.
Segal, M. (1974). Organization and environment: A typology of adaptability and structure. Public Administration Review, 34, 212-220.
51.
Shelton, M. W., & Albee, T. (2000). Financial performance monitoring and customer-oriented government: A case study. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 12, 87-105.
52.
Strachota, D. (1994). Ablueprint for state and local government budgeting. GovernmentFinance Review, 10, 48-50.
53.
Streib, G. (1991). Strategic decision making in council-manager governments: A status report. In International City Management Association (Ed.), The municipal year book 1991(pp. 14-23). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
54.
Wildavsky, A. (1961). Political implications of budgetary reform. Public Administration Review, 21, 183-190.
55.
Wildavsky, A. (1964). The politics of the budgetary process. Boston: Little, Brown.
56.
Wildavsky, A. (1978). A budget for all seasons? Why the traditional budget lasts. Public Administration Review, 38, 501-509.
57.
Wildavsky, A. (1986). Budgeting: A comparative theory of budgetary processes. Boston: Little, Brown.
58.
Wildavsky, A. (1988). The new politics of the budgetary process. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
59.
Willoghby, K. G. (1993). Patterns of behavior: Factors influencing the spending judgments of public budgeters. In T. D. Lynch& L. L. Martin (Eds.), Handbook of comparative public budgeting and financial management(pp. 103-132). New York: Marcel Dekker.
60.
Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organizations: Theory and practice. UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.
