This study examines how chief executives in small U.S. cities allocate their time, view their involvement in decisions related to the dimensions of the governmental process, who they consult in making decisions about local services, and the extent to which they perceive that their decisions are influenced by community interest groups. The study confirms that several differences exist among the different types of executives with respect to time allocation and role emphases. City managers spent more time on and perceived themselves to be more extensively involved in decisions related to local mission, policy, administration, and management compared with mayors. Mayors and city managers exhibited different patterns of consultation with key stakeholders inmaking decisions about local services. City managers were more likely than mayors to engage in activities related to the city’s mission and policy, but they tempered that involvement with a more inclusive pattern of consultation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aberbach, J. D.,& Rockman, B. A. (1988). Mandates or mandarins? Control and discretion in the modern administrative state. Public Administration Review, 48(2), 606-612.
2.
Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2000). In the web of politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
3.
Abney, G.,& Lauth, T. P. (1986). The politics of state and city administration. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
4.
Beierle, T. C.,& Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
5.
Benest, F. (1991). Marketing multiethnic communities. Public Management, 73, 4-14.
6.
Bosworth, K. L. (1958). The manager is a politician. Public Administration Review, 18(3), 216-222.
7.
Dunn, D. D., & Legge, J. S., Jr. (2002). Politics and administration in U.S. local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(3), 401-422.
8.
Dye, T. R.,& Garcia, J. A. (1978). Structure, function, and policy in American cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14(1), 103-123.
9.
Feiock, R. C., & Clingermayer, J. (1986). Municipal representation, executive power, and economic development policy activity. Policy Studies Journal, 15, 211-229.
10.
Ferman, B. (1985). Governing the ungovernable city: Political skill, leadership and the modern mayor. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
11.
Fredrickson, G. H. (1996). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Frederickson, G. H., Logan, B., & Wood, C. (2003). Municipal reform in mayor-council cities: A well-kept secret. State and Local Government Review, 35(1), 7-14.
13.
Grimes, M. D., Bonjean, C., Lyon, L.,& Lineberry, R. L. (1976). Community structure and leadership arrangements: A multidimensional analysis. American Sociological Review, 41(4), 706-725.
14.
Hansell, B. (1998). Is it time to “reform” the reform? Public Management, 80(12), 15-16.
15.
Hansen, S. B. (1975). Participation, political structure, and concurrence. American Political Science Review, 69(4), 1181-1199.
16.
International City/County Management Association. (1999). The municipal yearbook, 1999. Washington, DC: Author.
17.
Karnig, A. K. (1975). Private-regarding policy, civil rights groups, and the mediating impact of municipal reforms. American Journal of Political Science, 19(1), 91-106.
18.
Kearney, R. C.,& Scavo, C. (2001). Reinventing government in reformedmunicipalities: Manager, mayor and council actions. Urban Affairs Review, 37(1), 43-66.
19.
Keller, L., & Spicer, M. W. (1997). Political science and public administration: A necessary cleft? Public Administration Review, 57(3), 270-271.
20.
Lineberry, R. L., & Fowler, E. P. (1967). Reformism and public policies in American cities. The American Political Science Review, 61(3), 701-716.
21.
Lowi, T. J. (1993). Legitimizing public administration. Public Administration Review, 53(3), 261-264.
22.
Lowi, T. J. (1995). Lowi responds. Public Administration Review, 55(5), 490-494.
23.
Montjoy, R. S.,& Watson, D. J. (1995). Acase for reinterpreted dichotomy of politics and administration as a professional standard in council-manager government. Public Administration Review, 55(3), 231-239.
24.
Mouritzen, P. E.,& Svara, J. H. (2002). Leadership at the apex: Politicians and administrators inWestern local governments. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
25.
Newell, C., & Ammons, D. N. (1995). Role emphases of city managers and other municipal executives. In H. G. Fredrickson (Ed.), Ideal and practice in council-manager government(pp. 97-107). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
26.
Northrup, A., & Dutton, W. H. (1978). Municipal reform and group influence. American Journal of Political Science, 22(3), 691-711.
27.
O’Toole, L. J. (1987). Doctrines and developments: Separation of powers, the politics-administration dichotomy, and the rise of the administrative state. Public Administration Review, 47(1), 17-25.
28.
Rich, M. J., Giles, M. W.,& Stern, E. (2001). Collaborating to reduce poverty: Views from city halls and communitybased organizations. Urban Affairs Review, 37(2), 184-204.
29.
Schumaker, P.,& Getter, R. W. (1983). Structural sources of unequal responsiveness to group demands in American cities. The Western Political Quarterly, 36(1), 7-29.
30.
Stivers, C. (1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 364-369.
31.
Svara, J. H. (1985). Dichotomy and duality: Reconceptualizing the relationship between policy and administration in council-manager cities. Public Administration Review, 45(1), 221-232.
32.
Svara, J. H. (1990). Official leadership in the city: Patterns of conflict and cooperation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
Svara, J. H. (1998). The politics-administration dichotomy model as aberration. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 51-58.
34.
Svara, J. H. (1999a). Complementarity of politics and administration as a legitimate alternative to the dichotomy model. Administration and Society, 30(6), 676-705.
35.
Svara, J. H. (1999b). The shifting boundary between elected officials and city managers in large council-manager cities. Public Administration Review, 59(1), 44-53.
36.
Svara, J. H. (1999c). U.S. city managers and administrators in a global perspective. In International City/County Management Association (Ed.), The municipal yearbook 1999(pp. 25-33). Washington, DC: International City/ County Management Association.
37.
Svara, J. H. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176-183.
38.
Wright, D. S. (1969). The city manager as a development administrator. In R. T. Daland (Ed.), Comparative urban research(pp. 203-248). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
Yates, D. (1977). The ungovernable city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
