Mediation is rapidly becoming the dispute resolution technique of choice in public administration. This researche xamines the ways in whichfeder al mediators approachdis pute resolution in labormanagement relations. The analyses are based on semistructured interviews that were conducted with 15 mediators at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS). Mediators’descriptions of the mediation process are evaluated withr espect to three models: problem solving, transformative, and bifocal. Given the success of the FMCS at mediating a widening variety of disputes, the results of this study should generalize to other dispute resolution contexts. Practical implications of this research are as follows: (a) Mediators should adopt a bifocal approach, simultaneously attending to overarching relationship issues as well as the concrete, immediate issues in dispute; (b) the parties to a dispute must be actively engaged in the mediation process; (c) conflict resolution and collaborative problem solving is a long-term affair; and (d) public administrators involved in dispute resolution and collaborative problem solving should be prepared to take small steps.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albrecht, K. (1994). The power of bifocal vision. Management Review, 83(4), 42-46.
2.
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language(4th ed.). (2000). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
3.
Antes, J. R., Folger, J. P., & Noce, D. J. D. (2001). Transforming conflict interactions in the workplace: Documented effects of the USPS Redress Program. Hofstra Labor& Employment Law Journal, 18,429-467.
4.
Avison, D. E., Eardley, W. A., & Powell, P. (1998). Suggestions for capturing corporate vision in strategic information systems. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 26, 443-459.
5.
Ayyar, R. V. V. (1996). Educational policy planning and globalization. International Journal of Educational Development, 16, 347-353.
6.
Bingham, L. B. (1997). Mediating employment disputes: Perceptions of Redress at the United States Postal Service. Review of Public Personnel Administration,17(2), 20-30.
7.
Bingham, L. B.,& Chachere, D. R. (1999). Dispute resolution in employment: The need for research. In A. E. Eaton& J. H. Keefe (Eds.), Employment dispute resolution and worker rights in the changing workplace(pp. 95-135). Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
8.
Bingham, L. B., Chesmore, G., Moon, Y.,& Napoli, L. M. (2000). Mediating employment disputes at the United States Postal Service: Acomparison of in-house and outside neutral mediator models. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(1), 5-19.
9.
Bingham, L. B., & Novac, M. C. (2001). Mediation’s impact on formal discrimination complaint filing: Before and after the REDRESS program at the USPS. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 21, 308-331.
10.
Bingham, L. B., & Pitts, D. W. (2002). Highlights of Mediation at work: Studies of the National REDRESS Evaluation Project. Negotiation Journal, 18, 149-160.
11.
Bowling, D.,& Hoffman, D. A. (2000). Bringing peace into the room: The personal qualities of the mediator and their impact on the mediation. Negotiation Journal, 165-28.
12.
Brett, J. M. (1986). Commentary on procedural justice papers. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard,& M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations(Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
13.
Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z. I., & Goldberg, S. B. (1996). The effectiveness of mediation: An independent analysis of cases handled by four major service providers. Negotiation Journal, 12, 259-269.
14.
Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. B. (1983). Grievance mediation in the coal industry: A field experiment. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37, 49-69.
15.
Briggs, S., & Koys, D. J. (1990). An empirical investigation of public-sector mediator effectiveness. Journal of Collective Negotiations, 19, 121-128.
16.
Burns, R. P. (2001). Some ethical issues surrounding mediation. Fordham Law Review, 70,691-718.
17.
Bush, R. A. B.,& Folger, J. P. (1994). The promise of mediation: Responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Carnevale, P. J., Conlon, D. E., Hanisch, K. A.,& Harris, K. L. (1989). Experimental research on the strategic-choice model of mediation. In K. Kressel & D. G. Pruitt (Eds.), Mediation research(pp. 344-367). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Carnevale, P. J., & Pruitt, D. G. (1992). Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 531-582.
20.
Conlon, D. E., Carnevale, P.,& Ross, W. H. (1994). The influence of third party power and suggestion on negotiation: The surface value of a compromise. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1084-1113.
21.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act(2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Dilts, D. A.,& Haber, L. J. (1989). The mediation of contract disputes in the Iowa public sector. Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector, 18, 145-151.
23.
Downie, B. M. (1991). When negotiations fail: Causes of breakdown and tactics for breaking the stalemate. Negotiation Journal, 7, 175-186.
24.
DuBow, F. L., & McEwen, C. (1993). Community boards: An analytic profile. In S. E. Merry & N. Milner (Eds.), The possibility of popular justice: A case study of community mediation in the United States(pp. 125-168). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
25.
Dunoon, D. (2002). Rethinking leadership in the public sector. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(3), 3-18.
26.
Eaton, A. E.,& Keefe, J. H. (Eds.). (1999). Introduction and overview. In Employment dispute resolution and worker rights in the changing workplace. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
27.
Esser, J. K.,& Marriott, R. G. (1995). Mediation tactics: A comparison of field and laboratory research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1530-1546.
28.
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. (1999). Conflict resolution for government. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
29.
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. (2002). Alternative dispute resolution services to government: Fifty years of conflict resolution. Retrieved from www.fmcs.gov/pubinfo/Brochures/index.htm
30.
Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Folger, J. P. (2001). Mediation research: Studying transformative effects. Hofstra Labor& Employment Law Journal, 18, 385-397.
32.
Folger, J. P., & Bush, R. A B. (1996). Transformative mediation and third-party intervention: Ten hallmarks of a transformative approach to practice. Mediation Quarterly, 13, 263-278.
33.
Franz, P. L. (1998). Habits of a highly effective transformative mediation program. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 13, 1039-1070.
34.
Gogan, J. L. (1998). Bifocal IS management. Information Week, 691, 146-146.
35.
Hallberlin, C. J. (2001). Transforming workplace culture through mediation: Lessons learned from swimming upstream. Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal, 18, 375-381.
36.
Harari, O. (1997). Looking beyond the vision thing. Management Review, 86(6), 26-29.
37.
Harris, K. L., & Carnevale, P. (1990). Chilling and hastening: The influence of third-party power and interests on negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 138-160.
38.
Hebdon, R. (1996). Public sector dispute resolution in transition. In D. Belman, M. Gunderson, & D. Hyatt (Eds.), Public sector employment in a time of transition. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.
39.
Houston, P. D. (2000). Balancing paradox. Association Management, 52(6), 62-66.
40.
Karim, A.,& Dilts, D. A. (1990). Determinants of mediation success in the Iowa public sector. Journal of Collective Negotiations, 19, 129-140.
41.
Kearney, R. C.,& Carnevale, D. G. (2001). Labor relations in the public sector(3rd ed.). NewYork: Marcel Dekker.
42.
Keashly, L., & Newberry, J. (1995). Preference for and fairness of intervention: Influence of third-party control, third-party status and conflict setting. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 277-293.
43.
Kochan, T. A., & Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. (1997). Final report on the national performance review survey for the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. Boston: University of Massachusetts Center for Survey Research.
44.
Kochan, T. A.,& Jick, T. (1978). The public sector mediation process: A theory and empirical examination. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 209-240.
45.
Kochan, T. A., & Katz, H. C. (1988). Collective bargaining and industrial relations(2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
46.
Kolb, D. M., & Kressel, K. (1994). The realities of making talk work. In D. M. Kolb et al. (Eds.), When talk works: Profiles of mediators(pp. 459-493). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
Kriesky, J. (1999). Trends in dispute resolution in the public sector. In A. E. Eaton& J. H. Keefe (Eds.), Employment dispute resolution and worker rights in the changing workplace(pp. 247-292). Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
48.
Kryder, L. G. (1997). How “bifocal vision” and a living document create success. Technical Communication, 44, 382-389.
49.
Labor-Management Committee of the State and Local Government. (1992). Grievance mediation in state and local government. Washington, DC: Labor-Management Committee.
50.
Lan, Z. (1997). A conflict resolution approach to public administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 27-35.
51.
LaRue, H. C. (2000). The changingworkplace environment in the new millennium: ADR is a dominant trend in the workplace. Columbia Business Law Review, 2000, 453-498.
52.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
53.
Lind, A. E., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
54.
Lucas, N. (2001). Restitution, rehabilitation, prevention, and transformation: Victim offender mediation for first time non violent youthful offenders. Hofstra Law Review, 29, 1365-1400.
55.
Mareschal, P. M. (1998). Providing high quality mediation: Insights from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18(4), 55-67.
56.
Mareschal, P. M. (2002a). Mastering the art of dispute resolution: Best practices from the FMCS. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(11), 1351-1377.
57.
Mareschal, P. M. (2002b). Resolving conflict: Tactics of federal mediators. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 11, 41-68.
58.
Marksteiner, P. (1998). How confidential are federal sector employment-related dispute mediations? Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 14, 89-155.
59.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
McEwen, C. (1992). Note on mediation research. In S. B. Goldberg, F. E. Sander, & N. Rogers (Eds.), Dispute resolution: Negotiation, mediation, and other processes(2nd ed., pp. 155-157). Boston: Little, Brown.
61.
McKee, J. (1993, April). Beyond litigation: New approaches to federal labor relations—Let’s give change a chance. Paper presented at the Spring Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, Seattle, WA.
62.
Merry, S. E.,& Milner, N. (Eds.). (1993). Introduction. In The possibility of popular justice: A case study of community mediation in the United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
63.
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press.
64.
Moore, C. W. (1996). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict(2nd ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65.
Nabatchi, T.,& Bingham, L. R. (2001). Transformative mediation in the USPS Redress Program: Observations of ADR specialists. Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal, 18, 399-427.
66.
Nader, L. (1993). When is popular justice popular? In S. E. Merry& N. Milner (Eds.), The possibility of popular justice: A case study of community mediation in the United States(pp. 435-451). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
67.
Peterson, R. B., & Peterson, M. R. (1987). Toward a systematic understanding of the labor mediation process. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 4, 141-160.
68.
Riskin, L. L. (1993). Two concepts of mediation in the FMHA’s farmer-lender mediation program. Administrative Law Review, 45, 21-64.
69.
Ross, W. H.,& Weiland, C. (1996). Effects of interpersonal trust and time pressure on managerial mediation strategy in a simulated organizational dispute. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 228-248.
70.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing your data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71.
Sander, F. E. A.,& Goldberg, S. B. (1994). Fitting the forum to the fuss: A user-friendly guide to selecting an ADR procedure. Negotiation Journal, 10, 49-68.
72.
Schwerin, E. W. (1995). Mediation, citizen empowerment, and transformational politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
73.
Seul, J. R. (1999). How transformative is transformative mediation?: A constructive-developmental approach. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 15, 135-172.
74.
Shapiro, D., & Brett, J. M. (1993). Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1167-1177.
75.
Stepp, J. R., Sweeney, K. M., & Johnson, R. L. (1998). Interest-based negotiation: An engine-driving change. Journal for Quality and Participation, 21(5), 36-41.
76.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
77.
Strauss, G., & Whitfield, K. (1998). Research methods in industrial relations. In K. Whitfield & G. Strauss (eds.), Researching the world of work: Strategies and methods in studying industrial relations(pp. 5-30). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
78.
Tompkins, J. (2002). Strategic human resources management in government: Unresolved issues. Public Personnel Management, 31, 95-110.
79.
Trochim, W. K. (2001). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.
80.
Umbreit, M. S. (2001). The handbook of victim offender mediation: An essential guide to practice and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
81.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1997). Alternative dispute resolution: Employers’ experiences with ADR in the workplace. Washington, DC: Author.
82.
Vandermerwe, S. (1995). The process of market-driven transformation. Long Range Planning, 28(2), 79-91.
83.
Wall, J. A., Jr.,& Lynn, A. (1993). Mediation: Acurrent review. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 160-194.
84.
Wall, J. A., Jr., Stark, J. B., & Standifer, R. B. (2001). Mediation: A current review and theory development. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 370-391.
85.
Wells, J. C.,& Liebman, W. B. (1996). Newmodels of negotiation, dispute resolution, and joint problem solving. Negotiation Journal, 12, 119-138.
86.
Wissler, R. L. (1995). Mediation and adjudication in the small claims court: The effects of process and case characteristics. Law and Society Review, 29, 323-358.
87.
Whipp, R. (1998). Qualitative methods: Technique or size? In K. Whitfield & G. Strauss (eds.), Researching the world of work: Strategies and methods in studying industrial relations(pp.51-63). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
88.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
89.
Zack, A. (1985). Public sector mediation. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
