Although discourse theorists have deconstructed Western rationality and rejected objectivism and analytical means, the critique of the rational in discourse theories often does not go far enough. Discourse theories that remain wedded to instrumental action (good means ensure good ends) and continue to ignore the nonrational (emotions, bias, ideology, money, or power) do not offer a vision of public space that is open and inclusive. An alternative theoretical perspective of associational discursive space is offered here, a perspective grounded in feminist ethics and in a reformulation of Hannah Arendt’s notion of agonistic tension. In associational discursive space, storytelling and narrative theory substitute for rational argumentation and rational theory and allow us to talk with one another beyond the rational.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G. B.
(1992). Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52(4), 363-373.
2.
Arendt, H.
(1961). On revolution. New York: Penguin.
3.
Arendt, H.
(1971). Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. New York: Penguin.
4.
Arendt, H.
(1978). The life of the mind: Vol. 1. Thinking. New York: Brace Janovich.
5.
Benhabib, S.
(1992). Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
6.
Benhabib, S.
(1994). Hannah Arendt and the redemptive power of narrative. In L. P. Hinchman & S. K. Hinchman (Eds.), Hannah Arendt: Critical essays (pp. 111-142). Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
Benhabib, S.
(1996). From identity politics to social feminism. In D. Trend (Ed.), Radical democracy: Identity, citizenship, and the state (pp. 27-41). New York: Routledge.
8.
Bennett, L. W.
(1998). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. PSOnline. (www.aspanet.org). December, 741-761.
9.
Bohm, D.
(1985). Unfolding meaning. London: Routledge.
10.
Butler, J.
(1995). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In S. Benhahib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions (pp. 35-58). New York: Routledge.
11.
Connell, R. W.
(1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Damasio, A. R.
(1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
13.
Dennard, L.
(1996). The maturation of public administration: The search for a democratic identity. In G. L. Wamsley & J. E. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding democratic public administration (pp. 293-326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Dryzek, J. S.
(1990). Discursive democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Dryzek, J. S.
, & Torgenson, D. (1993). Democracy and the policy sciences: A progress report. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 127-138.
16.
Farmer, D.
(1995). The language of public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
17.
Farmer, D.
(1997). Public administration discourse as play with a purpose. Public Voices, 3(1), 33-52.
18.
Farmer, D.
(Ed.). (1998). Papers on the art of anti-administration. Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
19.
Ferguson, A.
(1998, March 2). Ye olde town gimmick. Time, 88.
20.
Fisher, W. R.
(1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
21.
Follett, M. P.
(1924). Creative experience. New York: Longmans, Green.
22.
Fox, C. J.
, & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Fraser, N.
(1995a). From irony to prophecy in politics: A response to Richard Rorty. In R. B. Goodman (Ed.), Pragmatism: A contemporary reader (pp. 125-148). New York: Routledge.
24.
Fraser, N.
(1995b). Pragmatism, feminism, and the linguistic turn. In S. Benhahib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions (pp. 157-172). New York: Routledge.
25.
Habermas, J.
(1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action (C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Habermas, J.
(1987). Theory of communicative action (Vols. 1-2; T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon. (Original work published 1984)
27.
Hong, B.
(1993). Political theory and the displacement of politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
Hummel, R.
(1994). The bureaucratic experience (4th ed.). New York: St. Martins.
29.
Kaboolian, L.
(1998). The new public management: Challenging the boundaries of the management versus administration debate. Public Administration Review, 58(2), 189-193.
30.
Keen, S.
(1992). Fire in the belly. New York: Bantam Books.
31.
Keller, E. F.
(1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
32.
King, C. S.
, Stivers, C., & Collaborators. (1998). Government is us: Public administration in an anti-government era. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Littlejohn, S. W.
(1992). Theories of human communication (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34.
MacKinnon, C.
(1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourse on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Marini, F.
(1971). Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective. New York: Chandler.
36.
McSwite, O. C.
(1996). Postmodernism, public administration, and the public interest. In G. L. Wamsley & J. E. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding democratic public administration (pp. 198-224). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
McSwite, O. C.
(1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
McSwite, O. C.
(1998). The new normativism and the new discourse movement: A meditation. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20(3), 377-381.
39.
Miller, H. T.
, & King, C. S. (1998). Practical theory. The American Review of Public Administration, 28(1), 23-60.
40.
Morton, N.O’R.
, & Lindquist, S. A. (1997). Revealing the feminist in Mary Parker Follett. Administration & Society, 29(3), 348-371.
41.
Pickel, A.
(1993). Authoritarianism or democracy? Marketization as a political problem. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 139-164.
42.
Scott, F. E.
(1997). Postmodern discourse and a postconventional public administration: Is there a normative theory beyond the dichotomy?Administrative Theory & Praxis, 19(1), 58-72.
43.
Shepard, L. J.
(1993). Lifting the veil: the feminine face of science. Boston: Shambhala.
44.
Stivers, C.
(1990). The public agency as polis: Active citizenship in the administrative state. Administration & Society, 22(1), 86-105.
45.
Stone, D. A.
(1997). Policy paradox and political reason (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
46.
Terry, L.
(1998). Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the new public management movement. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 194-200.
47.
Tong, R. P.
(1993). Feminine and feminist ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
48.
Tong, R. P.
(1998) Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
49.
Wamsley, G. L.
, & Wolf, J. E. (1996). Introduction: Can a high-modern project find happiness in a postmodern era? In G. L. Wamsley & J. E. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding democratic public administration (pp. 1-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
White, J. D.
(1993). Images of administrative reason and rationality: The recovery of practical discourse. In H. D. Kass & B. L. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 132-150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
White, O.
(1991). Reframing the authority/participation debate. In G. Wamsley, et al., (Eds.), Refounding public administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Witherell, C.
(1991). The self in narrative: A journey into paradox. In C. Witherell & N. Noddings (Eds.), Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education (pp. 83-95). New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
Witherell, C.
, & Noddings, N. (1991). Prologue: An invitation to our readers. In C. Witherell & N. Noddings (Eds.), Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education (pp. 1-12). New York: Teachers College Press.
