This article portrays the pragmatism of Charles S. Peirce, William James, and John Dewey as an insignificant influence during the early years of American public administration. The mainstream thinking during that time was exemplified by the ideas of Charles A. Beard, an influential figure in the early era of the field. Beard’s writings illustrate the way public administration ignored important aspects of pragmatism in favor of practical attitudes and focus on apolitical efficiency. As a result, administrative orthodoxy developed in opposition to pragmatism, which explains the abandonment and misinterpretation of Mary Parker Follett’s ideas. Equipped with the recognition that public administration has never really given pragmatism a chance, scholars and practitioners may be led to consider its possibilities in a contemporary administrative context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G. B.
(1992). Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52, 363-373.
2.
Auxier, R.
(1995). The decline of evolutionary naturalism in later pragmatism. In R. Hollinger & D. Depew (Eds.), Pragmatism: from Progressivism to Postmodernism (pp. 180-207). Westport, CT: Praeger.
3.
Beard, C. A.
(1913). An economic interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Macmillan.
4.
Beard, C. A.
(1916). Training for effective public service. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 64, 215-226.
5.
Beard, C. A.
(1919). American government and politics (rev. ed.). New York: Macmillan.
6.
Beard, C. A.
(1953). Philosophy, science, and art of public administration. In D. Waldo (Ed.), Ideas and issues in public administration. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Beard, C. A.
(1970). American city government—A survey of the newer tendencies (reprint ed.). New York: Arno.
8.
Beard, C. A.
, & Beard, W. (1931). The American leviathan: The republic in the machine age. New York: Macmillan.
9.
Borning, B. C.
(1962). The political and social thought of Charles A. Beard. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
10.
Bozeman, B.
(1979). Public management and policy analysis. New York: St. Martin’s.
11.
Caiden, G.
(1971). The dynamics of public administration. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
12.
Campbell, J.
(1995). Understanding John Dewey. Chicago: Open Court.
13.
Chandler, R. C.
, Ed. (1987). A centennial history of the American administrative state. New York: Free Press.
14.
Commager, H. S.
(1964). The American mind: an interpretation of American thought and character since the 1880’s. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Crick, B.
(1959). The American science of politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
deLeon, P.
, & Overman, E. S. (1989). A history of the policy sciences. In J. Rabin, W. B. Hildreth, & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public administration. New York: Marcel Dekker.
17.
Depew, D.
(1995). Pragmatism, positivism, and the linguistic turn. In R. Hollinger & D. Depew (Eds.), Pragmatism: From progressivism to postmodernism (pp. 109-121). Westport, CT: Praeger.
18.
Dewey, J.
(1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt.
19.
Dewey, J.
(1929). The quest for certainty. New York: Minton, Balch.
20.
Dewey, J.
(1998). The essential Dewey (vol. 1, L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander, Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21.
Egger, R.
(1975). The period of crisis: 1933 to 1945. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, future (pp. 49-96). University: University of Alabama Press.
22.
Fesler, J. W.
(1975). Public administration and the social sciences: 1946-1960. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, and future (pp. 97-141). University: University of Alabama Press.
23.
Fesler, J. W.
(1982). American public administration: Patterns of the past. Washington, DC: American Society for Public Administration.
24.
Follett, M. P.
(1918). The new state. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
25.
Follett, M. P.
(1919, November). Community is a process. Philosophical Review. 28, 576-588.
26.
Follett, M. P.
(1930). Creative experience. New York: Longman, Green.
27.
Fox, C. J.
, & Miller, H. T., (1996). Postmodern public administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Fry, B. R.
(1989). Mastering public administration. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
29.
Gaus, J. M.
(1936). American society and public administration. In The frontiers of public administration. J. M. Gaus, L. D. White, & M. E. Dimock (Eds.) (pp. 92-115). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Gergen, K.
(1992). Organization theory in the postmodern era. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organization (pp. 207-226). London: Sage.
31.
Gladden, E. N.
(1972). A history of public administration. London: Frank Cass.
32.
Goodnow, F. J.
(1900). Politics and administration. New York: Macmillan.
33.
Goodsell, C. T.
(1990). Public administration and the public interest. In Wamsleyet al. (Eds.), Refounding public administration (pp. 96-113). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Graham, P.
(1996). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
35.
Gulick, L.
, & L. Urwick (Eds.). (1937). Papers on the science of administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
36.
Harmon, M.
(1989). “Decision” and “action” as contrasting perspectives in organization theory. Public Administration Review, 49(2), 144-150.
37.
Harmon, M.
, & R. T. Mayer. (1986). Organization theory for public administration. Boston: Little, Brown.
38.
Henry, N. L.
(1975). Paradigms of public administration. Public Administration Review, 35, 378-386.
39.
Henry, N. L.
(1979). Public administration and public affairs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40.
Hill, L. B.
, & Herbert, F. T., (1979). Essentials of public administration. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
41.
James, W.
(1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Longman, Green.
42.
James, W.
(1907). Pragmatism: a new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longman, Green.
43.
Kildeff, M. K.
, & Mehra, A. (1997). Postmodernism and organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 453-481.
44.
Lee, E. W.
(1995). Political science, public administration, and the rise of the American administrative state. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 538-546.
45.
Lovejoy, A. O.
(1963). The thirteen pragmatisms. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
Marcell, D. W.
(1974). Progress and pragmatism. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
47.
McCurdy, H. E.
(1977). Public administration: A synthesis. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.
48.
McSwite, O. C.
(1996). Postmodernism, public administration, and the public interest. In G. L. Wamsley & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding democratic public administration (pp. 198-224). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
McSwite, O. C.
(1999, March). On the proper relation of the theory community to the mainstream public administration community. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21, 4-9.
50.
Miller, H. T.
& King, C. S. (1998). Practical theory. The The American Review of Public Administration, 28, 43-60.
51.
Morrow, W.
(1975). Public administration: Politics and the political system. New York: Random House.
52.
Mosher, F. C.
(Ed.). (1975). American public administration: Past, present, future. University: University of Alabama Press.
53.
Mosher, F. C.
(Ed.). (1981). Basic literature of American public administration: 1787-1950. New York: Holmes and Meier.
54.
Nash, G. D.
(1969). Perspectives on administration: The vistas of history. Berkeley: University of California Institute of Governmental Studies.
55.
Ostrom, V.
(1975). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. University: University of Alabama Press.
56.
Putnam, H.
(1995). Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
57.
Rorty, R.
(1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
58.
Rucker, D.
(1969). The Chicago pragmatists. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
59.
Sayre, W.
(1978). Premises of public administration. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 198-201). Oak Park, IL: Moore.
60.
Scheffler, I.
(1986). Four pragmatists: a critical introduction to Peirce, James, Dewey, and Mead. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
61.
Schick, A.
(1975). The trauma of politics. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, future (pp. 142-180). University: University of Alabama Press.
62.
Shafritz, J. M.
, & Hyde, A. C., Eds. (1978). Classics of public administration. Oak Park, IL: Moore.
63.
Simmons, R. H.
, & Dvorin, E. P., (1977). Public administration: Values, policy, and change. Port Washington, NY: Alfred.
64.
Simon, H.
(1947). Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
65.
Snider, K. F.
(1998). Living pragmatism: the case of Mary Parker Follett. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20(3), 274-286.
66.
Stever, J. A.
(1986, August). Mary Parker Follett and the quest for pragmatic administration. Administration and Society, 18, 159-177.
67.
Stivers, C.
(1995). Settlement women and bureau men: constructing a usable past for public administration. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 522-529.
68.
Stone, A. B.
, & Stone, D. C. (1975). Appendix: Case histories of early professional educational programs. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, future (pp. 268-269). University: University of Alabama Press.
69.
Stumpf, S. E.
(1966). Socrates to Sartre: A history of philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
70.
Tocqueville, Alexis de
. (1969). Democracy in America (G. Lawrence, trans., J. P. Mayer, Ed.) New York: Harper & Row.
71.
Turrisi, P. A.
(1997). Commentary. In C. S. Peirce (Ed.), Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking. Albany: State University of New York Press.
72.
Uveges, J. A.
, Ed. (1982). Public administration: History and theory in contemporary perspective. New York: Marcel Dekker.
73.
Vieg, J. A.
(1959). The growth of public administration. In F. Morstein Marx (Ed.), Elements of public administration (2nd ed., pp. 3-22). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
74.
Waldo, D.
(Ed.). (1953). Ideas and issues in public administration. New York: McGraw-Hill.
75.
Waldo, D.
(Ed.). (1984). The administrative state (2nd ed.). New York: Holmes and Meier.
76.
Wamsley, G.
, Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Kronenberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., Wolf, J. F. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
77.
White, M.
(1973). Pragmatism and the American mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
78.
Will, G. F.
(1998, November 11). Riding in on the highway bill. The Washington Post, p. 23A.
79.
Wilson, D. J.
(1995). Fertile Ground: Pragmatism, positivism, and the linguistic turn. In R. Hollinger & D. Depew (Eds.), Pragmatism: From progressivism to postmodernism (pp. 122-141). Westport, CT: Praeger.
