Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Community building, with its emphasis on developing capacities of organizations in low-income communities, is sparking wide interest among public administration practitioners and scholars. However, the community-building literature oversimplifies the complex relationships between individuals, community institutions, and government. Using a structuration approach theorized by Giddens, these interactions are explored using the arrival of new residents—or strangers—as the impetus for community redefinition. The article concludes that all types of communities, not just those typically targeted for community building may benefit from governmental interventions when undergoing transitions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloom, S. G. (2000). Postville: A clash of cultures in heartland America. New York: Harcourt.

Box, R. (1998). Citizen governance: Leading American communities into the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Clark, D. (1998, November). Healthy cities: A model for community improvement. Public Management, 80(11), 4-8.

Denhardt, R. B. , & Glaser, M. A. (1999). Communities at risk: A community perspective on urban social problems. National Civic Review, 88(2), 145-153.

Dionne, E. J. (Ed.). (1998). Community works: The revival of civil society in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Etzioni, A. (1995). Old chestnuts and new spears. In New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions and communities (pp. 16-34). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.

Juviler, P. , & Stroschein, S. (1999). Missing boundaries of comparison: The political community. Political Science Quarterly, 114(3), 435-453.

Kemmis, D. (1990). Community and the politics of place. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

10.

Mandell, M. P. (1999). Community collaborations: Working through network structures. Policy Studies Review, 16(1), 42-64.

11.

March, J. G. , & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.

12.

March, J. G. , & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: Free Press.

13.

Nalbandian, J. (1999). Facilitating community, enabling democracy: New roles for local government managers. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 187-197.

14.

Nalbandian, J. , & Oliver, J. (1999, May). City and county management as community building. Public Management, 81(5), pp. 20-22.

15.

Naparstek, A. , Smith, R. , & Dooley, D. (1997, September/October). Community building: Revitalizing the nation’s public housing. Journal of Housing and Community Development, 54, 39-48.

16.

Puddifoot, J. E. (1997, June). Psychological reaction to perceived erasure of community boundaries. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, pp. 343-355.

17.

Rochefort, D. A. , Rosenberg, M. , & White, D. (1998). Community as a policy instrument: A comparative analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 26(3), 548-568.

18.

Schneider, A. , & Ingram, H. (1990). The behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of Politics, 52, 511-529.

19.

Schneider, A. , & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334-347.

20.

Smith, S. R. (1997, summer). Partnerships, community building and local government. National Civic Review, 86, 167-174.

21.

Yin, J. S. (1998). The community development industry system: A case study of politics and institutions in Cleveland, 1967-1997. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(2), 137-157.

From Community Building to Governing Strangers

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References