This article discusses the concept of conjoint analysis and provides a model that can successfully integrate the analysis into prescribed research curricula. The model can be used in a traditional seminar or project analysis. A hypothetical example based on the testing of a widget is developed. Tables and instructions are provided to assist those with little quantitative skill in using conjoint analysis with readily available software.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bretton-Clark Newsletter, 516 Fifth Avenue, Suite 507, New York, NY 10036. Telephone: 212 / 575-1568.
2.
Cattin, Philippe , and Dick R. Wittink (1982). "Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey."Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer): 44-53.
3.
Fletcher, Keith . "An Analysis of Choice Criteria Using Conjoint Analysis."European Journal of Marketing, 22 (9): 25-33.
4.
Green, Paul E. (1984). "Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review."Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (May): 155-159.
5.
Green, Paul E. (1974). "On the Design of Choice Experiments Involving Multifactor Alternatives."Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (September): 61-67.
6.
Green, Paul E. (1973). "On the Analysis of Interactions in Marketing Research Data."Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (November): 410-420.
7.
Green, Paul E. , and Kristiaan Helsen (1989). "Cross Validation Assessment of Alternatives to Individual Level Conjoint Analysis: A Case Study."Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (August): 346-350.
8.
Green, Paul E. , and Vithala R. Rao (1971). "Conjoint Measurement for Qualifying Judgment Data."Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (August): 355-363.
9.
Green, Paul E. , and Yoram Wind (1975). "New Way to Measure Consumers' Judgments."Harvard Business Review, 53: 107-117.
10.
Hagarty, Michael R. (1985). "Improving the Predictive Power of Conjoint Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis."Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (May): 168-184.
11.
Holbrook, Morris B. (1974). "Integrating Compositional and Decompositional Analysis to Represent the Intervening Role of Perceptions in Evaluative Judgements."Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (May): 121-127.
12.
Lund, Daulatram D. , Naresh K. Malhorta, and Allen E. Smith (1988). "Field Validation Study of Conjoint Analysis Using Selected Mail Survey Response Rate Facilitator."Journal of Business Research, 16: 351-368.
13.
Moore, William L. , and Richard J. Semenik (1988). "Measuring Preferences with Hybrid Conjoint Analysis: The Impact of a Different Number of Attributes in the Master Design."Journal of Business Research, 26: 261-274.
14.
Robinson, Patrick J. (1979). "Applications of Conjoint Analysis to Pricing Problems." In Proceedings of ORSA / TIMS Special Interest Conference (26-28 March), edited by David B. Montgomery and Dick R. Wittink.
15.
Ogle, Robert S. (1986). "Conjoint Models Can Not Live on Tradeoffs Alone."Marketing News, 12 September: 22.
16.
Plackett, R. L. , and J. P. Burman (1946). "The Design of Optimum Multi-factorial Experiments."Biometrika, 33: 305-325.
17.
Riedesel, Paul L. (1985). "Conjoint Analysis Is Worthwhile Tool, But Be Sure Data Are Valid."Marketing News, 13 September36.
18.
Zicha, Michael A. , and Robert A. Roy (1986). "Conjoint Analysis: One Way to Answer Pricing Questions."Marketing News, 12 September, 16 and 23.
19.
Bretton-Clark Newsletter. 516 Fifth Avenue, Suite 507, New York, NY 10036. Telephone 212 / 575-1568.
20.
Cattin, Philippe , and Dick R. Wittink (1982). "Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey."Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer): 44-53.
21.
Green, Paul E. (1974). "On the Design of Choice Experiments Involving Multifactor Alternatives."Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (September): 61-67.
22.
Plackett, R. L. , and J. P. Burman (1946). "The Design of Optimum Multi-factorial Experiments."Biometrika, 33: 305-325.
