Education is presently under attack at all levels, with calls for improvement and increased accountability in teaching programs. This article uses the marketing audit concept, coupled with a set of research-based teaching program criteria, to provide a framework for evaluating and improving marketing teaching programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bloom, Allan (1987), The Closing of the American Mind, New York: Simon and Schuster.
2.
Bridge, R. Gary , Charles Judd, and Peter Moock (1979), The Determinants of Educational Outcomes, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
3.
Brophy, Jere (1982), "Classroom Organization and Management,"Conference on Research on Teaching: Implications for Practice, National Institute of Education, Warrenton, VA (February), 25-27.
4.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1982), The Control of the Campus, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5.
Center for Educational Policy and Management, College of Education, University of Oregon (1981a), Linking Educational Policy and Management with Student Achievement.
6.
Center for Educational Policy and Management, College of Education, University of Oregon (1981b), The Management of Education Professionals in Instructional Effective Schools: Toward a Research Agenda.
7.
Center for Educational Policy and Management, College of Education, University of Oregon (1981c), Creating Conditions for Effective Teaching.
8.
Codianni, Anthony and Gretchen Wilbur (1983), More Effective Schooling from Research to Practice, New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education, Teachers College, Columbia University (August).
9.
Cooley, William (1983), "Improving the Performance of an Educational System,"Educational Researcher, 12 (August), 4-12.
10.
Cooley, William and Gaea Leinhardt (1980), "The Instructional Dimensions Study,"Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2 (January-February), 7-25.
11.
Cornett, Claudia (1983), What You Should Know About Teaching and Learning Styles, Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
12.
Eisner, Elliot (1983), "The Art and Craft of Teaching,"Educational Leadership, 40 (January), 4-13.
13.
Glass, Gene V. , et al., "Class Size and Learning-New Interpretation of the Research Literature,"Today's Education, 68 (April), 42-44.
14.
Griffin, Gary (1982), "Staff Development,"Conference on Research on Teaching: Implications for Practice, National Institute of Education, Warrenton, VA (February), 25-27.
15.
Hirsch, E. D. (1987), Cultural Literacy, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
Levy, Jerre (1983), "Research Synthesis on Right and Left Hemispheres: We Think With Both Sides of the Brain,"Educational Leadership, 40 (January), 66-71.
17.
Madaus, George , Petere Airasian, and Thomas Kellaghan (1980), School Effectiveness: A Reassessment of the Evidence, New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
McGreal, Thomas (1983), Successful Teacher Evaluation, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19.
McKeachie, Wilbert J. (1969), Teaching Tips, 6th ed., Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
20.
Mortimer, Kenneth P. , et al. (1985), "Involvement in Learning: Realizing the Potential of American Higher Education,"Report of the Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education, Washington, DC.
21.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983), A Nation at Risk, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
22.
Research-Based School Improvement Practices (1984), State of Connecticut: Department of Education.
23.
Rosenshine, Barak (1982), "Teaching Functions in Instructional Programs,"Conference on Research on Teaching: Implications for Practice, National Institute of Education: Warrenton, VA (February), 25-27.
