This survey of 502 marketing professors reports how marketing faculty performance is currently evaluated and indicates that approximately 38%o of marketing faculty are dissatisfied and 17% are neutral regarding their current faculty evaluation systems. Five directions and 10 suggestions from the respondents for improving performance evaluation are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Marketing Association (1986), The 1986 American Marketing Association Membership Directory, Chicago.
2.
Beltramini, Richard F. , John L. Schlacter, and Craig Kelley (1985), "Marketing Faculty Promotion and Tenure Policies and Practices,"Journal of Marketing Education, 7 (Summer), 74-80.
3.
Cohen, Peter A. (1981), "Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Multisection Validity Studies,"Review of Educational Research, 51 (Fall), 281-309.
4.
Cornwell, Robert C. (1984), "The Evaluation of Faculty Performance,"Collegiate News & Views, 38 (Fall-Winter), 9-13.
5.
Marsh, Herbert W. and Dennis Hocevar (1984), "The Factorial Invariance of Student Evaluations of College Teaching,"American Educational Research Journal, 21 (Summer), 341-366.
6.
Mason, Joseph B. and Arthur W. Allaway (1985), "More Than One Way to Evaluate a College Professor's Performance,"Marketing News (July 19), 14, 15, and 22.
7.
Seldin, Peter (1985), Current Practices in Evaluating Business School Faculty, Pleasantville, New York: Pace University.
8.
Seldin, Peter (1986), "'Faculty Evaluation: Lessons Learned,"Proceedings of Faculty Evaluation and Development: Lessons Learned Conference, 22 (April 21-23), 3-11.
