This paper discusses the problem of identifying symbolic cues that can be used to reflect quality in teaching as perceived by students. The findings of this study may be applicable to evaluation of faculty rating scales in present use or to development of new instruments for student evaluation of faculty performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr. (1976), Marketing Research, Hinsdale, Ill.: The Dryden Press, pp. 275-276.
2.
Costin, Frank , William T. Greenough and Robert J. Menges (1971), "Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness,"Review of Educational Research41, 511-535.
3.
Hungate, Thad L. (1964), Management in Higher Education, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
4.
Kaplan, Abraham (1964), The Conduct of Inquiry, Scranton, Pa: Chandler Publishing Co., pp. 198-206.
5.
Kerlinger, Fred N. (1964), Foundations of Behavioral Research, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Ch. 25.
6.
Osgood, Charles E. , George J. Suci and Percy H. Tannenbaum (1957), The Measurement of Meaning, Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, Ch. 1, 8.
7.
Siegal, Sidney (1956), Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Wentz, Walter B. (1972), Marketing Research: Management and Methods, New York: Harper and Row, pp. 139, 530, 536.
9.
Zaltman, Gerald , Christian R. A. Pinson, and Reinhard Angelar (1973), Metatheory and Consumer Research, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 3947.
