This study was undertaken to determine whether the introduction of one form of peer grading could create an atmosphere whereby marketing students would be better able to learn and apply marketing concepts in the group project setting. Iden tical group projects were assigned to marketing students at both the graduate and undergraduate levels in two successive quarters. In one case peer evaluation was used; the following quarter it was not.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Clement, S.L. (1978), "The Dual Marking System-Simple and Effective ," American Secondary Education8, 49-52.
2.
Karlin, M., M. Kaplan, and W. Stuart (1969), "Academic Attitudes and Performance as a Function of Differential Grading Systems: An Evaluation of Princeton's Pass-Fail System ," Journal of Experimental Education37, 38-50.
3.
Lunnerborg, P.W. (1978), "College Grades: What Do Professors Intend to Communicate to Whom?" AAUP Bulletin64, 33-35.
4.
Park, R.C., and D.S. Kristol (1976), "Student Peer Evaluation," Journal of Chemical Education53, 177-178.
5.
Stover, R.V. (1976), "The Impact of Performance and Evaluation in a Constitutional Law Course," Teaching Political Science3, 303-310.
6.
Terwilliger, J.S. (1977), "Assigning Grades-Philosophical Issues and Practical Recommendations," Journal of Research and Development in Education3, 21-39.
