Are audio media more effective than visual media? Is a picture worth 1,000 words? Research studies in this area are inconclusive and subject to numerous inter pretive difficulties; however, there is general agreement that the use of both media reinforces the transmission of a message (DeBoth and Dominowski 1978).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barry, Thomas E. (1975), "Tests vs. Term papers: Some Empirical Results and Implications," 1975 Combined Proceedings, American Marketing Association, 679-683.
2.
Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (1972 ), The Fourth Revolution: Instructional Technology in Higher Education-A Report and Recommendations, McGraw-Hill, New York.
3.
Cundiff, Edward W., John H. Murphy, and William H. Cunningham (1975), "A Comparison of Four Alternative Teaching Formats and The Ideal Class," 1974 Southern Marketing Association Conference Proceedings, 196-198.
4.
Cunningham, William H. and Edward W. Cundiff (1974), "An Experiment in The Use of Multi-Media in Business Education," AACSB Bulletin, Volume 10, No. 2 (January), 41-45.
5.
___ and ___ (1974), "Student Evaluation of Learning Effectiveness in Multi-Media and Traditional Instruction in Introductory Marketing," 1973 Combined Proceedings, American Marketing Association, 24-30.
6.
d'Amico, Michael F. (1975), "The Effectiveness of a Programmed Text and a Standard Text in a Principles of Marketing Course: An Experimental Study," 1974 Combined Proceedings, American Marketing Association, 596-600.
7.
DeBoth, Carol J. and Roger L. Dominowski (1978), "Individual Differences in Learning: Visual Versus Auditory Presentation," Journal of Educational Psychology, Volume 70, No. 4, 498-503.
8.
Georgoff, David M. and Thomas F. Stroh (1972), "Evaluation of Supplementary Teaching Techniques in Marketing," The Southern Journal of Business, Volume 7, No. 2 (May), 57.
9.
Guseman, Dennis S. and Lee D. Dahringer (1976), "Effective Teaching Techniques: The Student's Perspective In The Introductory Marketing Course," Marketing: 1776-1976 and Beyond, Series #39, American Marketing Association, 540-543.
10.
Hammer, Mark and Obert Henderson (1973), "A Program For Improving Large Class Instruction," AACSB Bulletin, Volume 10, No. 1 (October), 45-48.
11.
Hustad, Thomas P. and Thomas W. Whipple (1975), "Analysis of Student Attitudes Towards Instructors' Use of Multimedia Teaching Aids," 1974 Combined Proceedings, American Marketing Association , 619-622.
12.
Marcus, Burton H. (1975), "A Comparison of Traditional and MultiMedia Mode Instruction," 1975 Combined Proceedings, American Marketing Association, 675-678.
13.
Norgaard, R.L. (1967), "Innovation and Experimentation in Higher Education for Business," AACSB Bulletin, Volume2, No. 3 (January), 24-32.
14.
Pierce, Frank N. and Joseph R. Pisani (1972), "The Multi-Media Approach to Marketing Education," 1971 Combined Proceedings , American Marketing Association, 50-54.
15.
Scott, Richard A. (1976), "An Experimental Study of a Structured Versus an Unstructured Approach in the Basic Marketing Course," 1975 Conference Proceedings Southern Marketing Association, 160-162.
