Do Technology-Based Sales Support Materials Make a Difference in Personal Selling? The Impact of Technology Usage by Gender in the Personal Selling Process

Abstract

Technology usage is widespread across most fields of business. In sales, “back-end” technologies, such as customer relationship management or salesforce automation, offer a foundation for effective and efficient “front-line” interactions in the personal selling process (PSP). In many instances, “front-line” technology applications have replaced traditional, hard-copy sales support materials. However, do these technology-based sales support materials (TSSM) offer meaningful utility in the PSP? Using a randomized field experiment, the current study answers the question through examining the use of TSSM within the PSP and across genders. Results indicate that the use of TSSM offers utility during the presentation and objection-handling stages of the PSP. There are no gender effects associated with technology use. The study offers educators pedagogical recommendations regarding the use of TSSM within the PSP. The study also validates the PSP scale.

Keywords

technology-based sales support materials TSSM personal selling process PSP gender PSP scale field experiment role-play sales competition confirmatory factory analysis CFA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahearne

Jelinek

Rapp

(2005). Moving beyond the direct effect of SFA adoption on salesperson performance: Training and support as key moderating factors. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(4), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.020

Ahearne

Jones

Rapp

Mathieu

(2008). High touch through high tech: The impact of salesperson technology usage on sales performance via mediating mechanisms. Management Science, 54(4), 671-685. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0783

Ahearne

Srinivasan

Weinstein

(2004). Effect of technology on sales performance: Progressing from technology acceptance to technology usage and consequence. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 24(4), 297-310.

Ahuja

M. K.

Thatcher

J. B.

(2005). Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 427-459. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148691

Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2018). 2013 Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. https://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards/business

Bandalos

D. L.

(2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5

Bolander

Bonney

Satornino

(2014). Sales education efficacy: Examining the relationship between sales education and sales success. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475314536733

Buehrer

R. E.

Senecal

Pullins

E. B.

(2005). Salesforce technology usage—reasons, barriers, and support: An exploratory investigation. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(4), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.017

Cai

Fan

(2017, February). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 105(February), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003

10.

Campbell

K. S.

Davis

Skinner

(2006). Rapport management during the exploration phase of the salesperson–customer relationship. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 26(4), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134260403

11.

Canhoto

Murphy

Kietzmann

Pitt

(2016). Learning from simulation design to develop better experiential learning initiatives: An integrative approach. Journal of Marketing Education, 38(2), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475316643746

12.

Carroll

(2006). Enhancing reflective learning through role-plays: The use of an effective sales presentation evaluation form in student role-plays. Marketing Education Review, 16(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2006.11488931

13.

Crittenden

Peterson

R. A.

(2019). Digital disruption: The transdisciplinary future of marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475319825534

14.

Cummins

Peltier

J. W.

Dixon

(2016). Omni-channel research framework in the context of personal selling and sales management. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2015-0094

15.

Cummins

Peltier

J. W.

Erffmeyer

Whalen

(2013). A critical review of the literature for sales educators. Journal of Marketing Education, 35(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475313481157

16.

Cummins

Peltier

J. W.

Pomirleanu

Cross

Simon

(2015). Evaluating educational practices for positively affecting student perceptions of a sales career. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475314568431

17.

Davenport

Guha

Grewal

Bressgott

(2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0

18.

De Beuckelaer

Wagner

S. M.

(2012). Small sample surveys: Increasing rigor in supply chain management research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(7), 615-639. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211258129

19.

Diamantopoulos

Sarstedt

Fuchs

Wilczynski

Kaiser

(2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3

20.

Donoho

Heinze

Kondo

(2012). Gender differences in personal selling ethics evaluations: Do they exist and what does their existence mean for teaching sales ethics? Journal of Marketing Education, 34(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475311430805

21.

Dubinsky

A. J.

(1981). A factor analytic study of the personal selling process. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 1(1), 26-33.

22.

Dubinsky

A. J.

Staples

W. A.

(1982). Sales training: Salespeople’s preparedness and managerial implications. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 2(1), 24-31.

23.

Dwyer

Orlando

Shepherd

C. D.

(1998). An exploratory study of gender and age matching in the salesperson-prospective customer dyad: Testing similarity-performance predictions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 18(4), 55-69.

24.

Ferrell

Gonzalez-Padron

T. L.

Ferrell

O. C.

(2010). An assessment of the use of technology in the direct selling industry. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 30(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134300206

25.

Ferrell

O. C.

Ferrell

(2020). Technology challenges and opportunities facing marketing education. Marketing Education Review, 30(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2020.1718510

26.

Fish

Mun

A’Jontue

(2016). Do visual aids really matter? A comparison of student evaluations before and after embedding visuals into video lectures. Journal of Educators Online, 13(1), 194-217.

27.

Florenthal

(2019). Students’ motivation to participate via mobile technology in the classroom: A uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(3), 234-253.

28.

Garrette

Phelps

Sibony

(2018). Sell the solution: Recommendation report and delivery. In Garrette

Phelps

Sibony

(Eds.), Cracked it! How to solve big problems and sell solutions like top strategy consultants (pp. 223-249). Palgrave Macmillan.

29.

Gefen

Straub

D. W.

(2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00008

30.

Hall

(2006). Nonverbal behavior, status, and gender: How do we understand their relations? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(4), 384-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00313.x

31.

Heinze

Lee

Fortune

(2018). Weighing the case for university sales competitions: Significant commitment and rewards. Journal of Selling, 18(1), 97-110.

32.

Hunter

G. K.

Perreault

W. D.

Jr. (2007). Making sales technology effective. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.1.016

33.

Hyde

J. S.

(2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581

34.

Jackson

D. L.

(2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N: q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6

35.

Johlke

M. C.

(2006). Sales presentation skills and salesperson job performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 21(5), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620610681614

36.

Kline

R. B.

(2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

37.

Leder

G. C.

Sampson

S. N.

(Eds.). (2017). Educating girls: Practice and research (Vol. 20). Taylor & Francis.

38.

Loe

T. W.

Chonko

L. B.

(2000). Promoting sales programs: The national collegiate sales competition. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 20(1), 11-13.

39.

Loe

T. W.

Inks

(2014). The advanced course in professional selling. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(2), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475314531963

40.

Mammen

J. R.

(2016). Computer-assisted concept mapping: Visual aids for knowledge construction. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(7), 403-406. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20160615-09

41.

Moulton

S. T.

Türkay

Kosslyn

S. M.

(2017). Does a presentation’s medium affect its message? PowerPoint, Prezi, and oral presentations. PLOS ONE, 12(7), e0178774. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178774

42.

Nevitt

Hancock

G. R.

(2004). Evaluating small sample approaches for model test statistics in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 439-478. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_3

43.

Nguyen

T. H.

Waring

T. S.

(2013). The adoption of customer relationship management (CRM) technology in SMEs: An empirical study. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(4), 824-848. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2012-0013

44.

Powers

T. L.

Jennings

J. A. C.

DeCarlo

T. E.

(2014). An assessment of needed sales management skills. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 34(3), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2014.890900

45.

Pullins

E. B.

Reid

D. A.

Plank

R. E.

(2004). Gender issues in buyer-seller relationships: Does gender matter in purchasing? Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(2), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2004.tb00173.x

46.

Rigdon

E. E.

(1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3(4), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540052

47.

Rocco

R. A.

Bush

A. J.

(2016). Exploring buyer-seller dyadic perceptions of technology and relationships. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-04-2015-0027

48.

Schoeneborn

(2013). The pervasive power of PowerPoint: How a genre of professional communication permeates organizational communication. Organization Studies, 34(12), 1777-1801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613485843

49.

Shannahan

R. J.

Bush

A. J.

Moncrief

W. C.

Shannahan

K. L.

(2013). Making sense of the customer’s role in the personal selling process: A theory of organizing and sensemaking perspective. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 33(3), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134330302

50.

Speier

Venkatesh

(2002). The hidden minefields in the adoption of sales force automation technologies. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.3.98.18510

51.

Spiller

L. D.

Kim

D. H.

Aitken

(2019). Sales education in the United States: perspectives on curriculum and teaching practices. Journal of Marketing Education, 42(3), 217-232.

52.

Spiro

R. L.

Weitz

B. A.

(1990). Adaptive selling: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379002700106

53.

Stevens

Whelan

(2019). Negotiating the gender wage gap. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 58(2), 141-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12228

54.

Sundaram

Schwarz

Jones

Chin

W. W.

(2007). Technology use on the front line: How information technology enhances individual performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-006-0010-4

55.

Szymanski

D. M.

(1988). Determinants of selling effectiveness: The importance of declarative knowledge to the personal selling concept. Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200106

56.

Teo

Milutinović

Zhou

(2016, March). Modelling Serbian pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A SEM and MIMIC approach. Computers & Education, 94, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.022

57.

U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics. (2019). Labour force statistics from the current Population Survey. http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

58.

Venkatesh

Morris

M. G.

(2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981

59.

Verbeke

Dietz

Verwaal

(2011). Drivers of sales performance: A contemporary meta-analysis: Have salespeople become knowledge brokers? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(3), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0211-8

60.

Williams

L. J.

O’Boyle

E. H.

Jr. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.002

61.

Yilmaz

E. T.

Derby

(2019). Importance of visual material support in surveying engineering education. Surveying and Land Information Science, 78(2), 61-66.

62.

Young

M. R.

(2002). Experimental learning = hands-on + minds-on. Marketing Education Review, 12(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2002.11488770

63.

Zell

Krizan

Teeter

S. R.

(2015). Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis. American Psychologist, 70(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038208