Moving Forward With Research on Case-Based Learning: A Commentary on “How to Improve Written Case Analysis and Reduce Grading Time: The One-Page,Two-Case Method”
Restricted accessArticle commentaryFirst published online December, 2019
Moving Forward With Research on Case-Based Learning: A Commentary on “How to Improve Written Case Analysis and Reduce Grading Time: The One-Page,Two-Case Method”
AbernethyA. M.ButlerD. D. (1993). Scaled case grading forms: A method to improve the assessment of student case performance. Marketing Education Review, 3, 40-46.
2.
BaconD. R. (2016). Reporting actual and perceived student learning in educational research. Journal of Marketing Education, 38, 3-6.
3.
BaconD. R. (2006, April). Assessing improvement in case analysis skills. Paper presented at the meeting of the Marketing Educators Association Conference, San Francisco, CA.
4.
BaconD. R.Quinlan-WilderT. (2011, April). Toward a computer-scored assessment of marketing expertise. Paper presented at the meeting of the Marketing Educators Association Conference, San Diego, CA.
5.
BaconD. R.Quinlan-WilderT. (2014, April). Exploring the development of marketing expertise with authentic assessment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Marketing Educators Association Conference, San Jose, CA.
6.
BaileyJ. R. (2002). The case of the resurgent case. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 194.
7.
BanningK. C. (2003). The effect of the case method on tolerance for ambiguity. Journal of Management Education, 27, 556-567.
ChristensenC. M.CarlileP. R. (2009). Course research: Using the case method to build and teach management theory. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 240-251.
10.
CrittendenV. L.CrittendenW. F. (2006). The undergraduate capstone marketing course: Objectives, content, and pedagogy. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 8, 79-88.
11.
CrittendenV. L.CrittendenW. F.HawesJ. M. (1999). The facilitation and use of student teams in the case analysis process. Marketing Education Review, 9(3), 15-23.
12.
CrittendenV. L.WilsonE. J. (2006). An exploratory study of cross-functional education in the undergraduate marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 81-86.
13.
DesirajuR.GopinathC. (2001). Encouraging participation in case discussions: A comparison of the MICA and the Harvard case methods. Journal of Management Education, 25, 394-408.
14.
DrögeC.SprengR. (1996). Enhancing involvement and skills with a student-led method of case analysis. Journal of Marketing Education, 18(3), 25-34.
15.
GambleE. N.JelleyR. B. (2014). The case for competition: Learning about evidence-based management through case competition. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13, 433-445.
16.
GarvinD. A. (2007). Teaching executives and teaching MBAs: Reflections on the case method. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 364-374.
17.
GreenhalghA. M. (2007). Case method teaching as science and art: A metaphoric approach and curricular application. Journal of Management Education, 31, 181-194.
18.
KarnsG. L. (2005). An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences, and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 163-171.
19.
LoewensteinJ.ThompsonL.GentnerD. (2003). Analogical learning in negotiation teams: Comparing cases promotes learning and transfer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2, 119-127.
20.
MesnyA. (2013). Taking stock of the century-long utilization of the case method in management education. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 30, 56-66.
21.
MinerF. C.Jr.DasH.GaleJ. (1984). An investigation of the relative effectiveness of three diverse teaching methodologies. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9(2), 49-59.
22.
PassynK. A.BillupsM. J. (2019). How to improve written case analysis and reduce grading time: The one-page, two-case method. Journal of Marketing Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0273475319826621
23.
PittL.CrittendenV. L.PlanggerK.HalvorsonW. (2012). Case teaching in the age of technological sophistication. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 11-28
24.
RiddleE. J.SmithM.FrankforterS. A. (2016). A rubric for evaluating student analyses of business cases. Journal of Management Education, 40, 595-618.
25.
SlavinR. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education—What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37, 5-14.
26.
StewartA. H. (1991). The role of narrative structure in the transfer of ideas: The case study and management theory. In BazermanC.ParadisJ. (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 120-144). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
27.
StewartK. A.WinnJ. (1996). The case debate: A new approach to case teaching. Journal of Management Education, 20(1),48-59.
28.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2017). WWC procedures and standards handbook (Version 4.0). Washington, DC: Author. Available from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks.