This research explores the impact of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphic pressures on the coverage and offering of courses addressing ethical, social, and sustainability issues (ESSI) in business schools’ graduate marketing curricula. Data from the Aspen Institute’s Beyond Grey Pinstripes program are analyzed to detect if significant increases have occurred in the number of marketing courses addressing ESSI offered when comparing data from 2005 to 2007, 2007 to 2009, and 2005 to 2009. In addition, analysis of the databases from 2007 and 2009 are undertaken to assess if there are increases in the percentage of coverage of ESSI in the marketing curricula. Significant increases in graduate marketing course offerings focusing on ESSI were found over time but not an increase in the coverage of ESSI in these courses. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2004). Ethics education in business schools. St. Louis, MO: Author.
2.
BanerjeeS. B. (2002). Organizational strategies for sustainable development: Developing a research agenda for the new millennium. Australian Journal of Management, 27, 105-117.
3.
BanerjeeS. B.IyerE. S.KashyapR. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67, 106-122.
4.
BiswasA.LicataJ. W.McKeeD.PulligC.DauthridgeC. (2000). The recycling cycle: An empirical investigation of consumer waste recycling and recycling shopping behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19, 93-105.
5.
BorinN.MetcalfL. (2010). Integrating sustainability into the marketing curriculum: Learning activities that facilitate sustainable marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 140-154.
6.
BridgesC. M.WilhelmW. B. (2008). Going beyond green: The “why and how” of integrating sustainability into the marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 33-46.
7.
ChristensenL. J.PierceE.HartmanL. P.HoffmanW. M.CarrierJ. (2007). Ethics, CSR and sustainability education in the financial times top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 9-31.
8.
DiMaggioP.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
9.
DobschaS.OzanneJ. (2001). An ecofeminist analysis of environmentally sensitive women using qualitative methodology: The emancipatory potential of an ecological life. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20, 201-214.
10.
DolanP. (2002). The sustainability of sustainable consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 22, 170-181.
11.
GinsbergJ. M.BloomP. N. (2004). Choosing the right green marketing strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 79-84.
12.
GreenP. L. (2009). Business schools promote responsibility. Global Finance, 23, 6.
13.
HartS. L. (2005). Capitalism at the crossroads: The unlimited business opportunities in solving the world’s most difficult problems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
14.
HartS. L.MilsteinM. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 56-69.
15.
HawleyA. (1968). Human ecology. In DiMaggioP.PowellW. W. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 328-337). New York, NY: Macmillan.
LangerakF. (1998). Exploratory results on the antecedents and consequences of green marketing. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40, 323-325.
18.
LoeT. W.FerrellL. (2001). Teaching marketing ethics in the 21st century. Marketing Education Review, 11, 1-16.
19.
MartinsonsM. G. (1993). Outsourcing information systems: A strategic partnership with risks. Long Range Planning, 26, 18-25.
20.
MeyerJ.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
21.
ParmentalG. L. (1988). Ethics in the business curriculum. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
22.
RosenzweigP. M.SinghJ. V. (1991). Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16, 340-361.
23.
SchaeferA.CraneA. (2005). Addressing sustainability and consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 25, 76-92.
24.
ShannonJ. R.BerlR. L. (1997). Are we teaching ethics in marketing? A survey of students’ attitudes and perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1059-1075.
25.
SinghapakdiA. (2004). Important factors underlying ethical intentions of students: Implications for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 261-270.
26.
SinghapakdiA.VitellS. J. (1994). Ethical ideologies of future marketers: The relative influences of Machiavellianism and gender. Journal of Marketing Education, 15, 34-42.
27.
StevensonT. H.BodkinC. D. (1996). University students’ perceptions regarding ethics and acceptability of sales practices: A scenario based study of gender effect. Marketing Education Review, 6, 1-12.
28.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2004). United Nations decade of education for sustainable development. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/en/
29.
van DamY.ApeldoornP. (1996). Sustainable marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 16, 45-56.
30.
Van der ZwanF.BhamraT. (2003). Services marketing: Taking up the sustainability development challenge. Journal of Services Marketing, 17, 341-356.
31.
WeberJ.GreenS.GladstoneJ. (2013). Responding to the call: Changes in graduate management curriculum’s attention to social and environmental issues. Teaching Ethics13, 137-157.
32.
World Watch Institute. (2006). Vital signs 2005. New York, NY: Norton.
33.
ZaheerS. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 341-363.
