This article explores the changing worldview of a new generation of learners and the threat that this poses to the future of experiential learning (EL). Initially the differing characteristics of three generations of learners, X, Y, and Z, are outlined, along with key educational reforms they have been subject to, particularly in the United Kingdom, the case study location. Following this, a series of ethnographic EL snapshots, collected between 1991 and 2010, are used to develop a continuum of learner disengagement. This continuum includes academically challenged, ambivalent, and formulaic learners. Of these, it is the formulaic learner who presents the greatest threat to EL. This is a discerning and discriminating learner who wishes to be in control of his or her own achievements and who sees EL activities as a threat to his or her success. Practical ways of responding to the changing EL landscape are proposed. These proposals include moving away from a linear learning experience, embracing EL projects that capitalize on learner technological capabilities, and reviewing the timing and conditions within which EL activities are situated.
AllinsonC. W.HayesJ. (1988). The learning styles questionnaire: An alternative to Kolb’s inventory?Journal of Management Studies, 25, 269-281.
2.
ArumR.RoksaJ. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (2001). Handbook of ethnography. London, England: Sage.
4.
BakewellC.MitchellV. W. (2003). Generation Y female consumer decision-making styles. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 31(2), 95-106.
5.
BartlettM. (2004). Analyst: Understanding that shapes generation can help the . . . CU market to that generation. Credit Union Journal, 8(21), 14-17.
BecherT. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham, England: SHRE & Open University Press.
9.
BickelJ.BrownA. J. (2005). Generation X: Implications for faculty recruitment and development in academic health centers. Academic Medicine, 80, 205-210.
10.
BillettS. (2009). Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 827-843.
BrowneJ. (2010). Securing a sustainable future for higher education. An independent review of higher education funding and student finance. Retrieved from http://www.independent.gov.uk/browne-report
13.
CallenderC.JacksonJ. (2008). Does the fear of debt constrain choice of university and subject of study?Studies in Higher Education, 33, 405-429.
14.
CaseyA. J.GoldmanE. F. (2010). Enhancing the ability to think strategically: A learning model. Management Learning, 41, 167-185.
15.
CookD. T. (2004). The commodification of childhood: The children’s clothing industry and the rise of the child consumer. London, England: Duke University Press.
16.
CunliffeA. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28, 407-425.
17.
DaltonP. (2003). Managing the generation. ABA Washington News, 11(19), 1-3.
18.
Deloitte. (2005). Who are the millennials? A.k.a. Generation Y. New York, NY: Author.
19.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Kappa Delta Pi.
20.
EkstromK. M. (2010). Consumer socialization in families. In MarshallD. (Ed.), Understanding children as consumers (pp. 41-60). London, England: Sage.
21.
EssidJ. (2006). “Disengaged” students are the victims, not the culprits [Letters to the editor]. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chroncile.com/article/Disengaged Students-Are-the/3834/
22.
FallowsS.AhmetK. (1999). Experiential learning through practicals. In FallowsS.AhmetK. (Eds.), Inspiring students. Case studies in motivating the learner (pp. 7-16). London, England: Kogan Page.
23.
FoschtT.SchlofferJ.MalolesC.ChiaS. L. (2009). Assessing the outcomes of Generation-Y customers’ loyalty. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27, 218-241.
GordonT.HollandJ.LahelmaE. (2007). Ethnographic research in educational settings. In AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 188-203). London, England: Sage.
26.
GreenS.TaberT. (1978). Structuring experiential learning through experimentation. Academy of Management Review, 3, 889-895.
27.
GremlerD.HoffmanD.KeaveneyS.WrightL. (2000). Experiential learning exercises in services marketing courses. Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 35-44.
28.
GuberS.BerryJ. (1993). Marketing to and through kids. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
29.
GunterB.FurnhamA. (1998). Children as consumers. A psychological analysis of the young people’s market. London, England: Routledge.
30.
HaighM. (2001). Constructing Gaia: Using journals to foster reflective learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25, 167-189.
HoweN.StraussW. (2000). Millennials rising. The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage.
34.
IllerisK. (2007). What do we actually mean by experiential learning?Human Resource Development Review, 6(1), 84-95.
35.
JarvisP.HolfordJ.GriffinC. (2003). The theory and practice of learning (2nd ed.). Oxon, England: Routledge Falmer.
36.
KarnsG. (2005). An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 163-171.
37.
KarnsG. (2006). Learning style differences in the perceived effectiveness of learning activities. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 56-63.
38.
KayeB.Jordan-EvansS. (2008). Love ‘em or lose ‘em: Getting good people to stay (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
39.
KempsterS.StewartJ. (2010). Becoming a leader: A co-produced autoethnographic exploration of situated learning of leadership in practice. Management Learning, 41, 205-219.
40.
KolbD. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social sciences. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
42.
LiT.BarnettA.GreenbergG.NichollsJ. A. F. (2007). Teaching experiential learning: Adoption of an innovative course in an MBS marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 29, 25-33.
43.
LincolnD. J. (2008). The editor’s corner. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 183-184.
44.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45.
LindonJ. (2005). Understanding child development. Linking theory and practice. Oxon, England: Hodder Arnold.
46.
LockeK.BrazeltonJ. (1997). Why do we ask them to write, or whose writing is it anyway?Journal of Management Education, 21, 44-57.
47.
LoflandJ.LoflandL. (1995). Analysing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
48.
MannS. J. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7-19.
49.
MartonF.SaljoR. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning—I: Outcomes and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
50.
McCrindleM. (2002). Understanding Generation Y. Sydney, Australia: Australian Leadership Foundation.
51.
McNealJ. (1987). Children as consumers: Insights and implications. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
52.
McNealJ. (1999). The kids market. Myths and realities. New York, NY: Paramount Market.
53.
MorrisonM.SweeneyA.HeffernanT. (2006). Karn’s learning styles and learning effectiveness: A rejoinder. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 64-68.
54.
NavvarS. (2001). Inside the mind of Gen Y. American Demographics, 23(9), 6.
55.
NeumannR. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education26, 135-146.
56.
NobleS. M.HaytkoD. L.PhillipsJ. (2009). What drives college-age Generation Y consumers?Journal of Business Research, 62, 617-628.
57.
O’MalleyL.RyanA. (2006). Pedagogy and relationship marketing: Opportunities for frame restructuring using African drumming. Journal of Marketing Management, 22, 195-214.
58.
PalfreyJ.GasserU. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
59.
ParsonsA.Lepkowska-WhiteE. (2009). Group projects using clients versus not using clients. Do students perceive any differences?Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 154-159.
60.
PavlovichK.CollinsE.JonesG. (2009). Developing students’ skills in reflective practice: Design and assessment. Journal of Management Education, 33, 37-58.
61.
PetersonP. E.WestM. R. (2003). No child left behind? The politics and practice of school accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
62.
PetkusE. (2000). A theoretical and practical framework for service learning in marketing: Kolb’s experiential learning cycle. Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 64-70.
63.
PfefferJ.FongC. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 78-95.
64.
PiagetJ. (1970). Genetic epistemology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
65.
PrenskyM. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, MCB University Press, 9(5), 1-6.
66.
RaelinJ. A. (2009). The practice turn-away: Forty years of spoon-feeding in management education. Management Learning, 40, 401-410.
67.
ReynoldsM. (1997). Learning styles: A critique. Management Learning, 28(2), 115-133.
RichardsD. (1997). Developing cross-cultural management skills: Experiential learning in an international MBA programme. Management Learning, 28, 387-407.
70.
RobertsJ. M.ManolisC. (2000). Baby boomers and busters: An exploratory investigation of attitudes towards marketing, advertising and consumerism. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17, 481-497.
71.
SkiltonP. F.ForsythD.WhiteO. J. (2008). Interdependence and integration learning in student project teams: Do team project assignments achieve what we want them to?Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 57-65.
72.
SolomonM.BamossyG.AskegaardS.HoggM. K. (2006). Consumer behaviour. A European perspective (3rd ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
73.
StraussW.HoweN. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York, NY: Quill.
74.
StraussW.HoweN. (1998). The fourth turning: An American prophecy. New York, NY: Bantam.
75.
The Stationery Office. (2009). House of commons children, schools and families committee. national curriculum fourth report of session 2008-09 (Vol. I). London, England: Author.
76.
TapscottD. (2008). Grown up digital. How the Net generation is changing your world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
77.
UeltschyL. C. (2001). An exploratory study of integration interactive technology into the marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 63-72.
