This article analyzes the extent to which Australian and New Zealand marketing educators use dedicated or stand-alone courses to equip students with alternative views of business. A census of marketing programs in degree-granting universities was conducted. Program brochures were obtained via the Internet and were content analyzed. This study reports a lower proportion of universities requiring students to take a course dedicated to society and environmental issues than previous studies have. Only 27% of universities in Australia required students to take a dedicated ethics, social responsibility, and/or sustainability course. Only 8% of universities offered a dedicated core marketing ethical or social responsibility course. Previous sample estimates may have overstated ethical, social responsibility, and sustainability course requirements. There is considerable room for improvement in Australia and New Zealand if universities are to equip their students with the skills, knowledge, and ideas to benefit themselves, the organizations they choose to work for, and society as a whole.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). (2008). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/process/documents/AACSB_STANDARDS_Revised_Jan08.pdf
2.
Babbie, E. ( 2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth .
3.
Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2005). Response biases in marketing research. In R. Grover & M. Vriens (Eds.), Handbook of market research: Do’s and don’ts (pp. 204-237). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Beyond Grey Pinstripes. (2007). Preparing MBAs for social and environment stewardship. Retrieved September 5, 2008, from http://www.beyondgreypinstripes.org/rankings/bgp_2007_2008.pdf
5.
Boote, J., & Mathews, A. ( 1999). Saying is one thing; doing is another: The role of observation in market research. Journal of Qualitative Market Research , 2(1), 15-21.
6.
Bridges, C.M., & Wilhelm, B.W. ( 2008). Going beyond green: The "why and how" of integrating sustainability into the marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education30, 33-46.
7.
Buff, C.L., & Yonkers, V. ( 2004). How will they know right from wrong? A study of ethics in the mission statements and curriculum of AACSB undergraduate marketing programs. Marketing Education Review, 14(3), 71-79.
8.
Carroll, A.B. ( 1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39-49.
9.
Carroll, A.B. ( 1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38, 268-295.
10.
Christensen, L.J., Pierce, E., Hartman, L.P., Hoffman, W.M., & Carrier, J. ( 2007). Ethics, CSR and sustainability education in the financial times top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions . Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 9-31.
11.
Clarke, P., Gray, D., & Mearman, A. ( 2006). The marketing curriculum and educational aims: Towards a professional education? Marketing Intelligence and Planning , 24, 189-201.
12.
Cohan, J. ( 2002). "I didn’t know" and "I was only doing my job": Has corporate governance careered out of control? A case study of Enron’s information myopia. Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 275-99.
13.
European Quality Improvement System (EQUIS). ( 2008). EQUIS standards and criteria. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://www.efmd.org/component/efmd/?cmsid=041027hfyj
14.
Friedman, M. ( 1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Harris, H. ( 2001). Content analysis of secondary data: A study of courage in managerial decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics , 34, 191-208.
16.
Hunt, S. ( 2007). A responsibilities framework for marketing as a professional discipline. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 26, 277-283.
17.
Marketing and Sales Standards Setting Body (MSSSB). ( 2006). Functional map. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://www.msssb.org/marketing.htm
18.
Mick, D.G. ( 1996). Are studies of dark side variables confounded by socially desirable responding? The case of materialism. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 106.
19.
Navarro, P. ( 2008). The MBA core curricula of top-ranked U.S. business schools: A study in failure? Academy of Management Learning and Education , 7(1), 108-123.
20.
Ramsden, P. ( 2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge .
21.
Stringfellow, L., Ennis, S., Brennan, R., & Harker, M.J. ( 2006). Mind the gap: The relevance of marketing education to marketing practice. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 24, 245-256.
22.
Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. ( 2008). Teaching sustainability to business students: Shifting mindsets. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9, 206-221.
23.
Tilbury, D. ( 1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental Education Research, 1, 195-212.
24.
Tsalikis, J., & Fritzsche, D.J. (1989). Business ethics: A literature review with a focus on marketing ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 695-743.
25.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2004). United Nations decade of education for sustainable development. Retrieved September 5, 2008, from http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=27234andURL_DO=DO_TOPICandURL_SECTION=201.html
26.
Zinkhan, G.M., & Carlson, L. ( 1995). Green advertising and the reluctant consumer. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 1.
