This article introduces a selective approach to curriculum integration that consists of linking the subject matter of a new course with knowledge and skills acquired in two or more completed courses to create a deeper and richer learning experience. Benefits and challenges of the selective approach and an example of implementing an integrative project in a marketing elective are discussed. As part of the project, students in the undergraduate branding course design a marketing brochure to be used by the client, the marketing department, for student communication and recruiting purposes. This experiential team project benefits students who had the opportunity to apply new concepts and skills acquired in the branding class as well as reinforce consumer behavior and marketing research knowledge acquired in prior courses. The article discusses contributions and suggestions for project implementation.
Anderson, J.R. ( 2000). Learning and memory (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
2.
Andrade, H.G. ( 2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly . College Teaching, 53, 27-30.
3.
Athaide, G.A., & Desai, H. ( 2005). Design and implementation of an interdisciplinary marketing/management course on technology and innovation management. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 239-249.
4.
Bacon, D.R., & Stewart, K.A. ( 2006). How fast do students forget what they learn in consumer behavior? A longitudinal study. Journal of Marketing Education , 28, 181-192.
5.
Barber, C.S., Borin, N., Cerf, D.C., & Swartz, T.A. ( 2001). The role of marketing in an integrative business curriculum . Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 240-248.
Bridges, E. ( 1999). Experiential learning and customer needs in the undergraduate marketing research course. Journal of Marketing Education , 21, 51-59.
8.
Campbell, N.D., Heriot, K.C., & Finney, R.Z. ( 2006). In defense of silos: An argument against the integrative undergraduate business curriculum. Journal of Management Education , 30, 316-332.
9.
Crittenden, V.L., & Wilson, E.J. ( 2006). An exploratory study of cross-functional education in the undergraduate marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 81-86.
10.
Darian, J.C., & Coopersmith, L. (2001). Integrated marketing and operations team projects: Learning the importance of cross-functional cooperation . Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 128-135.
11.
Davis, R., Misra, S., & Van Auken, S. ( 2002). A gap analysis approach to marketing curriculum assessment: A study of skills and knowledge. Journal of Marketing Education , 24, 218-224.
12.
DeConinck, J., & Steiner, T. ( 1999). Developing an integrated finance and marketing MBA core course. Journal of Marketing Education, 21, 44-50.
13.
Duke, C.R. ( 2002). Learning outcomes: Comparing student perceptions of skill level and importance. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 203-217.
14.
Elam, E.L.R., &. Spotts, H.E. ( 2004). Achieving marketing curriculum integration: A live case study approach. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 50-65.
15.
Frontczak, N.T. ( 1998). A paradigm for the selection, use and development of experiential learning activities in marketing education. Marketing Education Review, 8(3), 25-33.
16.
Graeff, T.R. ( 1997). Bringing reflective learning to the marketing research course: A cooperative learning project using intergroup critique. Journal of Marketing Education, 19, 53-64.
17.
Karns, G.L. ( 2005). An update of marketing student perceptions of leaning activities: Structure, preferences, and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 163-171.
18.
Laird, K., Prince, M., & Spence, M.T. ( 2003). Inter-group communication among cross-disciplinary student teams: An exploratory study of process and effects. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 3, 26-39.
19.
McArthur, A.W., Hudson, R., Cook, G.L., Spotts, H., & Goldsmith, A. ( 2001). Creating and selling postcards: An integrative project class. Journal of Management Education, 25, 308-324.
20.
McKeage, K., Skinner, D., Seymour, R.M., Donahue, D.W., & Christensen, T. (1999). Implementing an interdisciplinary marketing/engineering course project: Project format, preliminary evaluation, and critical factor review. Journal of Marketing Education , 21, 217-231.
21.
Razzouk, N.Y., Seitz, V., & Rizkallah, E. ( 2003). Learning by doing: Using experiential projects in the undergraduate marketing strategy course. Marketing Education Review, 13(2), 35-41.
22.
Sloan, H.J., III, & McIntyre, F.S. (1993). Instructional and experiential synergism: The concurrent approach. Marketing Education Review , 3(3), 33-37.
23.
Smith, L.J. ( 2008). Grading written projects: What approaches do students find most helpful? Journal of Education for Business, 83, 325-330.
24.
Washburn, J.A., & Petroshius, S.M. (2004). Collaborative effort at marketing the university: Detailing a student-centered approach. Journal of Education for Business, 80, 35-40.
25.
Wheeler, A. ( 2003). Designing brand identity: A complete guide to creating, building and maintaining strong brands. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
26.
Young, M.R., & Murphy, J.W. ( 2003). Integrating communications skills into the marketing curriculum: A case study. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 57-70.
