This article reports on the use of group and individual diaries to control social loafing on the group project. Although both forms of the diary were designed to prevent social loafing, neither appeared to do so. An unexpected result of the individual diaries is that they appeared to make the majority of the class, namely the “nonloafers,” more aware of and less tolerant of their loafing partners. Consequently, firings of group members were most likely to occur when individual diaries were used. This article shows how the diary method affects peer evaluations and group behavior, investigates the convergent validity of the individual diary, and summarizes students' attitudes toward the diary method.
Abernethy, A.M. , & Lett, W.L., III. (2005). You are fired! A method to control and sanction free riding in group assignments . Marketing Education Review, 15(1), 47-54 .
2.
Albanese, R. , & Van Fleet, D. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency . Academy of Management Review, 10, 244-255 .
3.
Araki, I. , Hashimoto, H. , Kono, K. , Matsuki, H. , & Yano, E. (2006). Controlled trial of worksite health education through face-to-face counseling vs. e-mail on drinking behavior modification . Journal of Occupational Health, 48, 239-245 .
4.
Batra, M.M. , Walvoord, B.E. , & Krishnan, K.S. (1997). Effective pedagogy for student-team projects . Journal of Marketing Education, 19(2), 26-42 .
5.
Beatty, J. , Haas, R. , & Sciglimpaglia, D. (1996). Using peer evaluations to assess individual performances in group class projects . Journal of Marketing Education, 18(2), 17-27 .
6.
Belanger, K. , & Greer, J. (1992). Beyond the group project: A blueprint for a collaborative writing course . Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 6, 99-115 .
7.
Broden, M. , Hall, R. , & Mitts, B. (1971). The effect of self-recording on the classroom behavior of two eighth-grade students . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 191-199 .
8.
Brooks, C.M. , & Ammons, J.L. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments . Journal of Education for Business, 78, 268-272 .
9.
Chen, Y. , & Lou, H. (2004). Students' perceptions of peer evaluation: An expectancy perspective . Journal of Education for Business, 79, 275-282 .
10.
DiGangi, S.A. , Maag, J.W. , & Rutherford, R.B. , Jr. (1991). Self-graphing of on-task behavior: Enhancing the reactive effects of self-monitoring on on-task behavior and academic performance . Learning Disability Quarterly , 14, 221-230 .
11.
Dommeyer, C.J. (1986). A comparison of the individual proposal and the team project in the marketing research class . Journal of Marketing Education, 8(1), 30-38 .
12.
Dommeyer, C.J. , & Lammers, H.B. (2006). Students' attitudes toward a new method for preventing loafing on the group project: The team activity diary. Journal of College Teaching &Learning, 3, 15-22 .
13.
Forsyth, L. (1998). A prospective self-monitoring investigation of naturally occurring reinforcement of exercise behavior . Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 3921 .
14.
Freeman, K. , & Dexter-Mazza, E. (2004). Using self-monitoring with an adolescent with disruptive classroom behavior: Preliminary analysis of the role of adult feedback . Behavior Modification, 28, 402-419 .
15.
Goretsky, M.E. (1984). Class projects as a form of instruction . Journal of Marketing Education, 6(3), 33-37 .
16.
Grieb, T. , & Pharr, S.W. (2001). Managing free-rider behavior in teams. Journal of the Academy ofBusiness Education, 2, 37-47 .
17.
Haas, A. , Haas, R. , & Wotruba, T. (1998). The use of self-ratings and peer ratings to evaluate performances of student group members . Journal of Marketing Education, 20, 200-209 .
18.
Henke, J.W., Jr. (1985). Bringing reality to the introductory marketing student . Journal of Marketing Education, 7(3), 59-71 .
19.
Ingham, A. , Levinger, J. , & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 10, 371-384 .
20.
Kanfer, F. (1970). Self-monitoring: Methodological limitations and clinical applications . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Applications, 35, 148-152 .
21.
Kerr, N. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828 .
22.
Latane, B. , Williams, K. , & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832 .
23.
McCorkle, D.E. , Reardon, J. , Alexander, J.F. , Kling, N.D. , Harris, R.C. , & Iyer, R.V. (1999). Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly?Journal of Marketing Education, 21, 106-117 .
24.
McLaughlin, M. , & Fennick, R. (1987). Collaborative writing: Student interaction and response . Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 14, 214-216 .
25.
Mello, J. (1993). Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings . Journal of Management Education , 17, 253-259 .
26.
Myers, D. (1990). Social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill .
27.
North, A.C. , Linley, P.A. , & Hargreaves, D.J. (2000). Social loafing in a co-operative classroom task . Educational Psychology, 20, 389-392 .
28.
Richards, S. , McReynolds, W. , Holt, S. , & Sexton, T. (1976). Effects of information feedback and self-administered consequences on self-monitoring study behavior . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 316-321 .
29.
Robbins, T. (1995). Social loafing on cognitive tasks: An examination of the “sucker” effect . Journal of Business and Psychology, 9, 337-342 .
30.
Shepperd, J. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67-81 .
31.
Shepperd, J. , & Wright, R. (1989). Individual contributions to a collective effort: An incentive analysis . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 15, 141-149 .
32.
Snider, V. (1987). Use of self-monitoring of attention with LD students: Research and application . Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 139-151 .
33.
Strong, J. , & Anderson, R. (1990). Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data . Journal of Marketing Education, 12(2), 61-67 .
34.
Todd, A. , Horner, R. , & Sugai, G. (1999). Self-monitoring and self-recruited praise: Effects on problem behavior, academic engagement, and work completion in a typical classroom . Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(2), 66-76 .
35.
Williams, D.L. , Beard, J.D. , & Rymer, J. (1991). Team projects: Achieving their full potential . Journal of Marketing Education, 13(2), 45-53 .
36.
Williams, K. , & Karau, S. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570-581 .
