Structured case analysis is a hybrid pedagogy that flexibly combines diverse instructional methods with comprehensive case analysis as a mechanism to develop critical thinking skills. An incremental learning framework is proposed that allows instructors to develop and monitor content-specific theory and the corresponding critical thinking skills. Structured exercises are used initially to examine theory and augment critical thinking skills. The degree of structure decreases progressively as students develop these skills and master theory. The process culminates in traditional (unstructured) case analysis. This discussion explores the characteristics and benefits of structured case analysis and describes how the method can be implemented in a marketing case course. The incremental learning framework fosters metacognition and task generalization. Structured case analysis can be adapted to courses that seek to develop critical thinking and marketing decision making.
Athanassiou, N. , McNett, J. , & Harvey, C. (2003). Critical thinking in the management classroom: Bloom's taxonomy as a learning tool . Journal of Management Education, 27, 533-555 .
2.
Bloom, B. , Englehart, M. , Furst, E. , Hill, W. , & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman, Green and Company .
3.
Bonomo, T. , & Kosnik, T. (1989). Learning by the case method in marketing. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing .
4.
Braun, N. (2004). Critical thinking in the business curriculum . Journal of Education for Business, 79, 232-236 .
5.
Celuch, K. , & Slama, M. (1998). Critical thinking as an integrative theme for teaching lifelong learning skills in marketing. MarketingEducation Review, 8(3), 1-12 .
6.
Celuch, K. , & Slama, M. (2000). Student perceptions of a marketing course taught with the critical thinking approach. MarketingEducation Review , 10(1), 57-64 .
7.
Celuch, K. , & Slama, M. (2002). Promoting critical thinking and life-long learning: An experiment with the theory of planned behavior. MarketingEducation Review, 12(2), 13-22 .
8.
Clow, K. , & Wachter, M. (1996). Teaching methodologies used in basic marketing: An empirical investigation . Journal of Marketing Education , 18(1), 48-59 .
9.
Cooper, M. , & Loe, T. (2000). Using the theory of constraints' thinking processes to improve problem-solving skills in marketing . Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 137-146 .
10.
Corey, R.E. (1996). The use of cases in management education (No. 9-376-240). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing .
11.
Corey, R.E. (1998). Case method teaching (No. 9-581-058). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing .
12.
Corey, R.E. (1999). A note on case learning (No. 9-899-105). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing .
13.
Cravens, D. , Lamb, C. , & Crittenden, V. (2001). Strategic marketing management cases. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill .
14.
Crespy, C. , Rosenthal, D. , & Stearns, J. (1999). Change and growth: Advances in the use of cases in marketing. MarketingEducation Review, 9(3), 1-3 .
15.
Crittenden, V. , Crittenden, W. , & Hawes, J. (1999). The facilitation and use of student teams in the case analysis. MarketingEducation Review, 9(3), 15-23 .
16.
Droge, C. , & Spreng, R. (1996). Enhancing involvement and skills with a student-led method of case analysis . Journal of Marketing Education, 18(3), 25-34 .
17.
Elam, E. , & Spotts, H. (2004). Achieving marketing curriculum integration: A live case study approach . Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 50-65 .
18.
Ennis, R. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. Baron & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9-26). New York: Freeman .
19.
Gremler, D. , Hoffman, K. , Keaveney, S. , & Wright, L. (2000). Experiential learning exercises in services marketing courses . Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 35-44 .
20.
Haas, R. , & Wotruba, T. (1990). The project approach to teaching the cap-stone marketing course . Journal of Marketing Education, 12(2), 37-48 .
21.
Halpern, D. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring . American Psychologist, 53, 449-455 .
22.
Hamer, L. (2000). The additive effects of semistructured classroom activities on student learning: An application of classroom-based experiential learning techniques . Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 25-34 .
23.
Henson, S. , Kennett, P. , & Kennedy, K. (2003). Web-based cases in strategic marketing . Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 250-259 .
Karns, G. (1993). Marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences and effectiveness . Journal of Marketing Education, 15(1), 3-10 .
26.
Karns, G. (2005). An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences, and effectiveness . Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 163-171 .
27.
Klebba, J. (1988). Case analysis: Learning fallacies that can be addressed. In B. Stern and D. Lincoln (Eds.), Marketing education: Issues and applications (p. 8). Monterey, CA: Western Marketing Association .
28.
Klebba, J. (1989). Structured case analysis: Maximize experiential learning in the introductory MBA marketing course. In J. Young , R. Green and F. Gilbert (Eds.), Advances in marketing theory, practice, and education (pp. 141-146). Atlanta, GA: Society for Marketing Advances .
29.
Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview . Theory Into Practice, 41, 212-218 .
30.
Kuhn, D. , & Dean, D., Jr. (2004). Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice . Theory Into Practice, 43, 268-273 .
31.
Malhotra, N. , Tashchian, A. , & Jain, A. (1989). The project method approach: An integrated teaching tool in marketing research . Journal of Marketing Education , 11(2), 32-40 .
32.
McKendree, J. , Small, C. , & Stenning, K. (2002). The role of representation in teaching and learning critical thinking . Educational Review, 54(1), 57-67 .
33.
Nicastro, M. , & Jones, D. (1994). Cooperative learning guide for marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .
34.
Roy, A. , & Macchiette, B. (2005). Debating the issues: A tool for augmenting critical thinking skills of marketing students . Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 264-276 .
35.
Quelch, J. , & Farris, P. (1987). Case method teaching: Cases in advertising and promotion management. Plano, TX: Business Publications, Inc.
36.
Stock, J. , Hughes, M. , & Wahl, L. (1990). Use of a high involvement instructional method to enhance students' learning of distribution concepts . Journal of Marketing Education, 12(3), 22-29 .
37.
Tittle, C. , Hecht, D. , & Moore, P. (1993). Assessment theory and research for classrooms: From taxonomies to constructing meaning in context . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 13-19 .
38.
Wee, L. , Kek, M. , & Kelley, C. (2003). Transforming the marketing curriculum using problem-based learning: A case study . Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 150-162 .
39.
Wolcott, S. , Baril, C. , Cunningham, B. , Fordham, D. , & St. Pierre, K. (2002). Critical thought on critical thinking research . Journal of Accounting Education, 20, 85-103 .
40.
Wright, L. , Bitner, M. , & Zeithaml, V. (1994). Paradigm shifts in business education: Using active learning to deliver services marketing content . Journal of Marketing Education, 16(3), 5-19 .
