This article follows the development of a sales management in-basket exercise for use in the classroom. The authors have computerized the exercise and added features to allow for additional and more quantitative input from the students. The exercise has evolved and been tested in numerous classroom situations. The computerized in-basket exercise is shown to provide significant benefits over regular in-baskets when measured against the objectives of the exercise. These benefits include quantitative, immediate, and consistent feedback to students as well as spirited discussions in the classroom as to the role and actions of sales managers.
Barclay, L. A., & York, K. M. (1999). Electronic communication skills in the classroom: An e-mail in-basket exercise. Journal of Education for Business, 74, 249-253.
2.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
3.
Castleberry, S. B. (1990). An in-basket exercise for sales courses. Marketing Education Review, 1, 51-56.
4.
Clabaugh, M. G., Jr., Forbes, J. L., & Clabaugh, J. P. (1995). Bloom’s cognitive domain theory: A basis for developing higher levels of critical thinking skills in reconstructing a professional selling course. Journal of Marketing Education, 17, 25-34.
5.
Connelly, S., Helton-Fauth, W., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). A managerial in-basket study of the impact of trait emotions on ethical choice. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 245-261.
6.
Cooper, B. L., Clasen, P., Silva-Jalonen, D. E., & Butler, M. C. (1999). Creative performance in an in-basket exercise: Effects of inoculation against extrinsic reward. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 39-52.
7.
Craik, K. H., Ware, A. P., Kamp, J., O’Reilly, C., III, Staw, B., & Zedeck, S. (2002). Explorations of construct validity in a combined managerial and personality assessment programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 171-193.
8.
Day, N. E. (1995). Can performance raters be more accurate? Investigating the benefits of prior knowledge of performance dimensions. Journal of Managerial Issues, 7, 323-343.
9.
Eder, D. (2003). Juggling techniques for ensuring quality learning. St. Louis, MO: Undergraduate Assessment and Program Review and the Undergraduate Research Academy, the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business.
10.
Erwin, T. D. (1991). Assessing student learning and development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Frederiksen, N., Saunders, D. R., & Wand, B. (1957). The in-basket test. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 71(9), 1-28.
12.
Ingram, T. N. (1991). An in-basket exercise for sales courses: A commentary. Marketing Education Review, 1, 88-90.
13.
Kamalanabhan, T. J., & Sunder, D. L. (1999). Managerial risk-taking: An empirical study. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 421-430.
14.
Kesselman, G. A., Lopez, F. M., & Lopez, F. E. (1982). The development and validation of a self-report scored in-basket test in an assessment center setting. Public Personnel Management Journal, 11, 228-238.
15.
MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D. A. (1984). The risk in-basket. Journal of Business, 57, 367-388.
16.
Randall, E. J., Cooke, E. F., & Smith, L. (1985). A successful application of the assessment center concept to the salesperson selection process. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 5, 53-62.
17.
Schippman, J. S., Prien, E. P., & Katz, J. A. (1990). Reliability and validity of in-basket performance measures. Personnel Psychology, 43, 837-860.
18.
Shimko, B. W. (1992). Pre-hire assessment of the new work force: Finding wheat (and work ethic) among the chaff. Business Horizons, 35(3), 60-66.
19.
Sloman, M., & Lee, R. (1986). Using a live in-basket exercise for management training: A case study. Journal of European Industrial Training, 10(5), 6-11.
20.
Stearns, J. M., Ronald, K., Greenlee, T. B., & Crespy, C. T. (2003). Contexts for communication: Teaching expertise through case-based in-basket exercises. Journal of Education for Business, 78, 213-219.
21.
Stevens, G. E. (1996). Cases and exercises in human resource management. New York: McGraw Hill.
22.
Wagner, C. (2004). Teaching information systems management via action memos. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 5-7.
