This research examines the reasons behind marketing majors’ decision to select marketing as a major, where students have the option to select more than one major toward their undergraduate degree. Results of surveys conducted at two universities, one in Australia and one in New Zealand, provide some new findings as well as extending findings from earlier studies. This research complements existing studies on the topic by providing empirical evidence from Australasia. The results also suggest that marketing is the most popular first-choice major for Australasian marketing majors.
Astin, Alexander W., and Robert J. Panos. 1969. The educational and vocational developments of college students. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
3.
Currie, Jan, and Lesley Vidovich. 2000. Privatisation and competition policies for Australian universities. International Journal of Education Development20: 135-151.
4.
Danaher, Peter J., and Richard G. Starr Jr. 1998. A study of marketing departments in Australasian universities. European Journal of Marketing32(9/10): 771-784.
5.
Floyd, Callum J., and Mary Ellen Gordon. 1998. What skills are most important? A comparison of employer, student, and staff perceptions. Journal of Marketing Education20(2): 103-109.
6.
Hair, Joseph F., Jr., Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham, and William C. Black. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Hugstad, Paul. 1997. Marketing the marketing majors. Journal of Marketing Education19(Spring): 4-13.
8.
Juric, Biljana, Sarah Todd, and James Henry. 1997. From the student perspective: Why enroll in an introductory marketing course? Journal of Marketing Education19(Spring): 65-76.
9.
Keillor, Bruce D., Robert P. Bush, and Alan J. Bush. 1995. Marketing-based strategies for recruiting business students in the next century. Marketing Education Review5(3): 69-80.
10.
Kleine, Susan Schultz. 2002. Enhancing students’ role identity as marketing majors. Journal of Marketing Education24(1): 15-23.
11.
Kohli, Chiranjeev. 1995. Analysis of pilot marketing program impact on change of major. Working paper, California State University, Fullerton.
12.
LaBarbera, Priscilla A., and Jeffrey S. Simonoff. 1999. Toward enhancing the quality and quantity of marketing majors. Journal of Marketing Education21(1): 4-13.
13.
Lamont, Lawrence M., and Ken Friedman. 1997. Meeting the challenges to undergraduate marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education19(3): 17-30.
14.
Levine, Adeline. 1976. Educational and occupational choices: A synthesis of literature from sociology and psychology. Journalof Consumer Research2: 276-289.
15.
McCullough, James, Patriya S. Tansuhaj, and Acharanad Ronarithivichai. 1987. Choice criteria in foreign language training for international business. Journal of Marketing Education9(Fall): 15-20.
16.
Newell, Stephen J., Philip A. Titus, and James S. West. 1996. Investigating the undergraduate student decision-making process of selecting a business specialization: A comparison of marketing and non-marketing business students. Journal of Business Education18(Fall): 57-67.
O’Brien, Elaine M., and Kenneth R. Deans. 1995. The positioning of marketing education: A student versus employer perspective. Marketing Intelligence and Planning13(2): 47-52.
19.
Rummel, Rudolph J. 1970. Applied factor analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
20.
Schibrowsky, John A., James W. Peltier, and Thomas E. Boyt. 2002. A professional school approach to marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education24(1): 43-55.
21.
Schmidt, Sandra L., Kathleen Debevec, and Clare L. Comm. 1987. Marketing majors’ satisfaction with their college experience: Implications for strategic planning in marketing departments. Journal of Marketing Education9(Fall): 58-63.
22.
Smart, Denise T., Craig A. Kelley, and Jeffrey S. Conant. 1999. Marketing education in the year 2000: Changes observed and challenges anticipated. Journal of Marketing Education21(3): 206-216.
23.
Stafford, Thomas F. 1994. Consumption values and the choice of marketing electives: Treating students like customers. Journal of Marketing Education16(Summer): 26-33.
24.
Tom, Gail, Devin O’Grady, and Stoakley Swanson. 1995. The ethnocentric perspective of marketing students and faculty towards business majors. Marketing Education Review5(3): 19-24.
