Graduate and undergraduate students were asked to rate hypothetical teachers in a full-factorial, full-profile conjoint task. Teacher attributes of grading leniency, workload assigned, enthusiasm, and real-world orientation were manipulated. Achievement striving, a subscale of the Type A personality scale, was found to be inversely related to the tendency to give higher evaluations to lenient-grading teachers at the undergraduate level but not at the graduate level. Additional analyses and implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrami, Philip C. , Wenda J. Dickens, Raymond P. Perry, and Les L. Leventhal. 1980. Do teacher standards for assigning grades affect student evaluations of instruction?Journal of Educational Psychology72 (1): 107-118.
2.
Archibold, Randal C.1998. Give me an “A” or else. New York Times, May 24, WK 5-5.
3.
Armstrong, J. Scott . 1995. The devil’s advocate responds to an MBA student’s claim that research harms learning. Journal of Marketing59 (3): 101-106.
4.
Bacon, Donald R. , Kim A. Stewart, and Sue Stewart-Belle. 1998. Exploring predictors of student team project performance. Journal of Marketing Education20 (May): 63-71.
5.
Barling, Julian , and Danielle Charbonneau. 1992. Disentangling the relationship between the achievement striving and impatience-irritability dimensions of Type A behavior, performance and health. Journal of Organizational Behavior13 (4): 369-377.
6.
Bilimoria, Diana . 1995. Modernism, postmodernism, and contemporary grading practices. Journal of Management Education19 (November): 440-457.
7.
Cashin, William E. , and Ronald G. Downey. 1992. Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology84 (4): 563-572.
8.
Clayson, Dennis E. , and Debra A. Haley. 1990. Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured?Journal of Marketing Education12 (fall): 9-17.
9.
DeSarbo, Wayne S. , Lenard Huff, Marcelo M. Rolandelli, and Jungwhan Choi. 1994. On the measurement of perceived service quality: A conjoint analysis approach. In Service quality: New directions in theory and practice, edited by Roland Rust and Richard Oliver. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Engdahl, Richard Alan , Robert J. Keating, and John Perrachione. 1993. Effects of grade feedback on student evaluation of instruction. Journal of Management Education17 (May): 174-184.
11.
Feldman, Kenneth A.1976. Grades and college students’evaluations of their courses and teachers. Research in Higher Education4: 69-111.
12.
Friedman, M. , and R. H. Rosenman. 1959. Association of specific overt behavior pattern with increases in blood cholesterol, blood clotting time, incidence of arcus senilis and clinical coronary artery disease. Journal of the American Medical Association169: 1286-1296.
13.
Greenwald, Anthony G.1997. Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist52 (11): 1182-1186.
14.
Greenwald, Anthony G. , and Gerald M. Gillmore. 1997. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist52 (11): 1209-1217.
15.
Hair, Joseph F., Jr. , Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham, and William C. Black. 1995. Multivariate data analysis with readings. 4th ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
Jenkins, C. D. , S. J. Zyzanski, and R. H. Rosenman. 1971. Progress toward validation of a computer-scored test for the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern. Psychosomatic Medicine33 (3): 193-202.
17.
Karns, Gary L.1993. Marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education15 (spring): 3-10.
18.
Kelley, Craig A. , Jeffrey S. Conant, and Denise T. Smart. 1991. Master teaching revisited: Pursuing excellence from the student’s perspective. Journal of Marketing Education13 (summer): 1-10.
19.
Kuehn, A. A. , and Ralph A. Day. 1962. Strategy of product quality. Harvard Business Review40 (November-December): 100-110.
20.
Kumar, V. , and Gary J. Gaeth. 1991. Attribute order and product familiarity effects in decision tasks using conjoint analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing8 (June): 113-124.
21.
Lee, Cynthia , Susan J. Ashford, and Linda F. Jamieson. 1993. The effects of Type A behavior dimensions and optimism on coping strategy, health, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior14 (2): 143-157.
22.
Louviere, J. J.1988. Analyzing decision making: Metric conjoint analysis. Sage University paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, vol. 11. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Marsh, Herbert W.1982. Factors affecting students’evaluations of the same course taught by the same instructor on different occasions. American Educational Research Journal19: 485-497.
24.
Marsh, Herbert W.1984. Students’evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology76 (5): 707-754.
25.
Marsh, Herbert W. , and Lawrence A. Roche. 1997. Making students’evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist52 (11): 1187-1197.
26.
McKeachie, Wilbert J.1997. Student ratings: The validity of use. American Psychologist52 (11): 1218-1225.
27.
Murray, Harry G.1983. Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology75 (1): 138-149.
28.
Naftulin, D. H. , John E. Ware, Jr., and F. A. Donnelly. 1973. The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education71: 107-116.
29.
Ortinau, David J. , and Robert P. Bush. 1987. The propensity of college students to modify course expectations and its impact on course performance information. Journal of Marketing Education9 (spring): 42-52.
30.
Ostrom, Amy , and Dawn Iacobucci. 1995. Consumer trade-offs and the evaluation of services. Journal of Marketing59 (1): 17-28.
31.
Sax, Gilbert . 1980. Principles of educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. 2nd ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
32.
Schwartz, Martin L. , and Robert L. Thornton. 1986. Another use for course evaluations. Journal of Marketing Education8 (summer): 18-22.
33.
Spence, Janet T. , Robert L. Helmreich, and Robert S. Pred. 1987. Impatience versus achievement strivings in the Type A pattern: Differential effects on student’s health and academic achievement. Journal of Applied Psychology72 (4): 522-528.
34.
Tong, Hsin-Min , and Allen L. Bures. 1989. Marketing faculty evaluation systems: A national survey. Journal of Marketing Education11 (spring): 10-13.
35.
Vasta, Ross , and Robert F. Sarmiento. 1979. Liberal grading improves evaluations but not performance. Journal of Educational Psychology71 (2): 207-211.
36.
Webster, Cynthia . 1990. Evaluation of marketing professors: A comparison of student, peer, and self-evaluations. Journal of Marketing Education12 (spring): 11-17.
37.
Williams, R. G. , and John E. Ware, Jr.1977. An extended visit with Dr. Fox: Validity of student ratings of instruction after repeated exposures to a lecturer. American Educational Research Journal14: 449-457.
38.
Worthington, Alan G. , and Paul T. P. Wong. 1979. Effects of earned and assigned grades on student evaluations of an instructor. Journal of Educational Psychology71 (6): 764-775.
