Learning activities are described for study abroad tours with appropriateness discussed in terms of study tour characteristics of location, integration with academic credit, and time spent on the tour. Journal writing is the most versatile activity. Company visits are the most impressive to students. Simulations engage students but require computer technology. Projects require sufficient research resources. Lecture/testing and treasure hunts require more time on tour.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brokaw, Stephen C.1996. Planning, organizing, and executing short term international exposures for U.S. students of marketing and business: An alternative method. Marketing Education Review6 (3): 87-94.
2.
Burns, Alvin C. , and James W. Gentry. 1992. Computer simulation games in marketing: Past, present, and future. Marketing Education Review2 (1): 3-13.
3.
Butler, Daniel D. , and J. Ford Laumer, Jr.. 1992. Student attitudes toward marketing mix activities in the large class environment. Journal of Marketing Education14 (3): 40-46.
Drafke, Michael W. , Denise D. Schoenbachler, and Geoffrey L. Gordon. 1996. Active and passive teaching methodologies: Student outcomes over a semester course. Marketing Education Review6 (1): 9-18.
6.
Gordon, Peter , and D. K. Smith. 1992. Planning, organizing, and executing short term international exposures for U.S. students of marketing and business. Marketing Education Review2 (1): 47-54.
7.
Institute for International Education . 1997. Vacation study abroad.New York: Institute for International Education.
8.
Johnson, Denise M. , and Deanna D. Mader. 1992. Internationalizing your marketing course: The foreign study tour alternative. Journal of Marketing Education14 (2): 26-33.
9.
Kamath, Shyam J. , and Bruce E. MacNab. 1998. Developing business-ready marketing professionals: The strategic focus of the Asian international marketing(AIM)program. Journal of Marketing Education20(2): 110-120.
10.
Krishnan, H. Shanker , and Thomas W. Porter. 1998. A process approach for developing skills in a consumer behavior course. Journal of Marketing Education20 (1): 24-34.
11.
Laughlin, Jay L. , and Robert E. Hite. 1993. Game and simulation effectiveness in marketing education: An experimental investigation. Journal of Marketing Education15 (3): 39-46.
12.
Moncrief, William C. III , Shannon H. Shipp, and Charles W. Lamb, Jr.1995. Student journal writing in an international setting. Journal of Marketing Education17 (2): 71-80.
13.
Myers, C. , and T. B. Jones. 1993. Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Schibrowsky, John A. , and James W. Peltier. 1995. The dark side of experiential learning activities. Journal of Marketing Education17 (1): 13-24.
15.
Schuster, Camille P.1993. Planning and implementing overseas travel classes for executive MBA students. Marketing Education Review3 (3): 54-60.
16.
Schuster, Camille P. , Robert O. Zimmerman, Clinton B. Schertzer, and Paul W. Beamish. 1998. Assessing the impact of executive MBA international travel courses. Journal of Marketing Education20 (2): 121-132.
17.
Strong, James T. , and Rolph E. Anderson. 1990. Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education12 (2): 61-67.
18.
Stuart, F. Ian , and Stephen S. Tax. 1994. Services education: Cross-functional integration for quality. Journal of Marketing Education16 (3): 56-70.
19.
Wellington, William , A. J. Faria, and R. O. Nulsen, Jr.1996. An empirical investigation into the nature of the learning process in a computer-based simulation game. Marketing Education Review6 (3): 15-28.
20.
Wright, Lauren K. , Mary Jo Bitner, and Valarie A. Zeithaml. 1994. Paradigm shifts in business education: Using active learning to deliver services marketing content. Journal of Marketing Education16 (3): 5-20.
21.
Zikmund, William , and Michael D’Amico. 1996. Basic marketing. Minneapolis, MN: West.
