Abstract
Objective. To explore attitudes of practicing gynecologists regarding making treatment decisions for patients with benign uterine conditions frequently treated with hysterec tomy. Design. Mailed survey. Participants. 66 gynecologists practicing in the Greater Rochester, New York, area. Interventions. After reading brief vignettes, respondents indicated how they would treat patients with chronic pelvic pain, uterine leiomyomas, and abnormal uterine bleeding, and rated the importance of 24 considerations in mak ing their treatment decisions on a 1-to-5 scale ranging from not important to extremely important. Results. Fourteen considerations (58%) had group mean importance ratings higher than 3. Exploratory factor analysis identified four factors that accounted for 96% of the variance. Respondent gender, practice type, graduation from a U.S. vs a non- U.S. medical school, and opinion regarding roles of doctor and patient in making treat ment decisions were associated with significant differences in factor scores. Conclu sions. Gynecologists' attitudes toward hysterectomy decisions are complex, multifactorial, and variable. Depending on the extent to which these attitudes affect treatment decisions, differences among gynecologists in their clinical decision making processes could account for a substantial amount of the regional variability in hyster ectomy use. Key words: decision making; hysterectomy, physician-patient relation ship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.