The Relationship between Health-state Utilities and the SF-12 in a General Population

Abstract

It would be a major advance if quality-of-life instruments could be translated into health- state utilities. The aim with this study was to investigate the relationship between the SF-12 and health-state utilities, based on responses to a postal questionnaire sent to a random sample of 8,000 inhabitants, aged 20-84 years, in the general population. The questionnaire included the SF-12, a rating-scale (RS) question, and a time-tradeoff (TTO) question; the response rate was 68%. Age, gender, and the 12 items of the SF- 12 were used as explanatory variables in a linear regression analysis of the health- state utilities. The regression models explained about 50% of the variance in the RS answers and about 25% of the variance in the TTO answers. Most of the SF-12 items were related to the health-state utilities in the expected ways, with especially strong results for the RS method. The results suggest that the SF-12 can be converted to health-state utilities, but that further work is needed to reliably estimate the conversion function. Key words: health status; SF-12; rating scale; time-tradeoff; health-related quality of life; health-state utilities; population study. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:128- 140)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jonsson B. Quality of life—economic aspects. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1990;1 suppl:93-6.

Ware JE , Snow KK , Kosinski M. , Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute , 1993.

Drummond MF , O'Brien B. , Stoddart GL , Torrance GW Methods for the Economic Valuation of Health Care Programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Medical Publications, 1997.

Torrance GW Measurements of health status utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ. 1986;5:1-30.

Revicki DA Relationship between health utility and psychometric health status measures . Med Care 1992;30 (5 suppl): 274-82.

Revicki DA , Kaplan RM Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life. Quality Life Res 1993;2:477-87.

Fryback DG , Lawrence WF , Martin PA , Klein R. , Klein Bek. Predicting quality of well-being scores from the SF-36. Med Decis Making 1997;17:1-9.

Blumenschein K. , Johannesson M. Relationship between quality of life instruments, health state utilities and willingness to pay in patients with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998;80:189-94.

Bosch JL , Hunink Mgm. The relationship between descriptive and valuational quality-of-life measures in patients with intermittent claudication. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:217-25.

10.

Bult JR , Bosch JL , Hunink Mgm. Heterogeneity in the relationship between the standard-gamble utility measure and health-status dimensions. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:226-33.

11.

Fryback DG , Dasbach EJ , Klein R. , et al. The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health-state quality factors. Med Decis Making. 1993;13:89-102.

12.

Dolan P. , Gudex C. , Kind P. , Williams A. A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey. Discussion paper 138, University of York: Centre for Health Economics , York, U.K., 1995.

13.

Ware J. , Kosinski M. , Keller SD A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary test of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-33.

14.

Ware JE , Gandek B. , Aaronson N. , et al. Testing the SF-12 summary health measures in nine countries: results from the IQOLA project. Quality Life Res. 1997;6:739.

15.

Ware JE , Sherbourne D. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-83.

16.

Greene WH Econometric Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1993.

17.

Read JL , Quinn RJ , Berwick DM , Fineberg HV , Weinstein MC Preference for health outcomes: comparison of assessment methods. Med Decis Making. 1984;4:315-29.

18.

Hornberger JC , Redelmeier DA , Peterson J. Variability among methods to assess patients' well-being and consequent effect on a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:505-12.

19.

Torrance GW Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio-Economic Planning Sci. 1976;10:129-36.

20.

Stiggelbout A. , Eijkemans M. , Kiebert G. , Kievit J. , Leer J-W. , De Haes H. The 'utility' of the visual analog scale in medical decision making and technology assessment: is it an alternative to the time trade-off? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12:291-8.

21.

Fryback DG , Dasbach EJ , Klein R. , et al. Health assessment by SF-36, quality of well-being index and time trade-offs: predicting one measure from another (abstr. Med Decis Making. 1992;12:348.

22.

Tsevat J. , Solzan JG , Tolan KK , et al. Health status and utilities of HIV+ and primary care patients (abstr. Clin Res. 1992;40: 569A.

23.

Paltiel AD , Scharfstein JA , Seage Igr , et al. A Monte Carlo simulation of advanced HIV disease: application to CMV prevention. Med Decis Making. 1998;18(suppl):93-105.

24.

Johannesson M. , Pliskin JS , Weinstein MC A note on QALYs, time trade-off, and discounting . Med Decis Making. 1994;14: 188-93.

25.

Dolan P. , Gudex C. , Kind P. , Williams A. Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. J Health Econ. 1996;15:209-31.

26.

Bleichrodt H. , Johannesson M. An experimental test of a theoretical foundation for rating scale valuations. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:208-16.

27.

Torrance GW , Feeny DH , Furlong WJ , Barr RD , Zhang Y. , Wang Q. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: health utilities index Mark 2. Med Care. 1996;34:702-22.