Fox DM, Leichter HMRationing care in Oregon: the new accountabilityHealth Aff.1991 (Summer): 7-27.
2.
Hadorn DCThe problem of discrimination in health care priority settingJAMA.1992;268:1454-9.
3.
Tengs TO, Meyer G., Siegel JE, Pliskin JS, Graham JD, Weinstein MCOregon's Medicaid ranking and cost-effectiveness: is there any relationship?Med Decis Making.1996;16:99-107.
4.
Ubel PA, Lowenstein G., Scanlon D., Kamlet M.Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices: a partial explanation of why Oregon's cost-effectiveness list failedMed Decis Making.1996;16:108-116.
5.
Hadorn DCSetting health care priorities in Oregon: cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescueJAMA.1991;265: 2218-25.
6.
Hasnain R., Garland M.Health Care in Common: Report of the Oregon Health Decisions Community Meetings ProcessPortland, OR: Oregon Health Decisions, 1990.
7.
Freemantle N. , Maynard A.Something rotten in the state of clinical and economic evaluations? [editorial] Health Econ.1994;3:63-7.
8.
Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (eds). Cost-effectiveness in Health and MedicineNew York: Oxford University Press, in press.
9.
Hadorn DC, Uebersax J.Large-scale outcome evaluation: how should quality of life be measured? I : Calibration a brief questionnaire and a search for preference subgroupsJ Clin Epidemiol.1995;48:607-18.
10.
Hall MA, Anderson GFHealth insurers' assessment of medical necessityU Penn Law Rev.1992;140:1637-712.