Development of an Index of Maternal Transport

Abstract

The authors used a decision-analytic approach to develop a Maternal Transport Index (MTI) from ACOG guidelines for maternal transport. Data were obtained from three questionnaires administered to five perinatologists, practicing in facilities with various casemixes. Each questionnaire was based on a given level of hospital and contained scenarios describing indications for maternal transport. The MTls, ratios of the logs of the proportions with given outcomes in Level III hospitals relative to Level I (or II) hospitals, ranged from 1.0 to 26.3 for newborn outcomes. They were greater for Level I hospitals (than Level II) and when newborn outcomes included severe disability as well as death. Within gestational age cat egories, the MTI was generally greatest for active preterm labor and, within complication categories, for 24-26 or 27-31 weeks' gestation. It was large for maternal outcomes only for two rare acute medical conditions. The MTI has potential use in setting priorities for maternal transport. Key words: Maternal Transport Index; obstetrics; outcomes; newborns. (Med Decis Making 1993;13:64-73)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hein HA

Evaluation of a rural perinatal care system

Pediatrics. 1980;66:540-6.

Johnson KG

The promise of regional perinatal care as a national strategy for improved maternal and infant care

Public Health Rep. 1982;97:134-9.

Brann AW, Cefalo RC, eds. Guidelines for Perinatal Care American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1983.

Richardson DK , Bagge SG , Wind Y.

Decision analysis of high risk patient referral

Obstet. Gynecol. 1984;63:496-501.

Crenshaw C. , Payne P. , Blackman L. , Bowen C. , Gutberlet R.

Pre-maturity and the obstetrician. A regional intensive care nursery is not enough

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147:125-32.

Sinclair JC , Torrance GW , Boyle MH, et al.

Evaluation of neonatal-intensive-care programs

N Engl J Med. 1981;305:489-94.

Harris BA , Wirtschafter DD , Huddleston JF , Perlis HW

In utero versus neonatal transportation of high-risk perinates: a comparison

Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57:496-9.

Levy DL , Noelke K. , Goldsmith JP

Maternal and infant transport program in Louisana

Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57:500-4.

Merenstein GB , Pettett G. , Woodall J. , Hill JM

An analysis of air transport results in the sick newborn. II. Antenatal and neonatal referrals

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;128:520-5.

10.

Modanlou HD , Dorchester W. , Freeman RK , Rommal C.

Perinatal transport to a regional perinatal center in a metropolitan area: maternal versus neonatal transport

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138:1157-64.

11.

Miller TC , Densberger M. , Krogman J.

Maternal transport and the perinatal denominator

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147:19-24.

12.

Rudolph CS , Borker SR Regionalization. Issues in intensive care for high risk newborns and their families New York: Praeger, 1987.

13.

Boehm FH , Haire MF

One-way maternal transport: an evolving concept. Inpatient services

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134:484-92.

14.

Giles HR , Isaman J. , Moore WJ , Christian CD

The Arizona high-risk maternal transport system: an initial view

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;128:400-7.

15.

Souma ML

Maternal transport: behind the drama

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134:904-10.

16.

Frigoletto FD, Little GA, eds. Guidelines for perinatal care, second edition. American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988.

17.

Gustafson DH , Fryback DG , Rose JH, et al.

An evaluation of multiple trauma severity indices created by different index development strategies

Med Care. 1983;21:674-91.

18.

Dalkey NC Toward a theory of group estimation. In: Linstone HA, Turoff M, eds. The Delphi method, techniques and applications Ontario: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975 236-61.

19.

Selwyn BS Review of obstetrical risk assessment methods. In: Institute of Medicine. Research issues in the assessment of birth settings, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1982:149-70.

20.

Boyle MH , Torrance GW

Developing multiattribute health indexes

Med Care. 1984;22:1045-57.

21.

Patrick DL , Bush JW , Chen MM

Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index

Health Serv Res. 1973;8228-45.

22.

Sackett DL , Torrance GW

The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public

J Chronic Dis. 1978;31:697-704.

23.

Keeney RL , Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1976.

24.

Hutchinson TP

Statistical aspects of injury severity. Part I: Comparison of two populations when there are several grades of injury

Transportation Sci. 1976;10:269-99.

25.

Institute of Medicine, Committee to Study the Prevention of Low Birth Weight. Preventing low birth weight Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1985 .

26.

Lilienfeld AM , Parkhurst E. A study of the association of factors of pregnancy and parturition with the development of cerebral palsy A preliminary report. Am J Hyg. 1951;53:262-82.

27.

Freeman RK, Poland RL (eds). Guidelines for perinatal care, third edition. American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992.